What is Digg?376 Comments
- XBunnyRacer, on 12/23/2007, -2/+725Jessica Simpson has a new movie?
- quigles3000, on 12/23/2007, -8/+686Holy *****! I just cannot believe that! ...48 people PAID to see Jessica Simpson's new movie? *****!
- GetUthunized, on 12/23/2007, -2/+625At this rate, she'll be stepping out of a car with no panties on in 2 weeks tops
- inactive, on 12/23/2007, -1/+392this is a good sign for humanity
- penguinshome, on 12/23/2007, -2/+383We just beat out the movie sales number with diggs.
- yutt, on 12/23/2007, -12/+246This movie would have been huge success if not for online piracy.
- D3koy, on 12/23/2007, -1/+227I read the title as "Jessica Simpson's New Movie Grossed 384m on Friday" And I was in shock...The truth is much more realistic...
- Phillyzero, on 12/23/2007, -0/+203So, she WILL be going through with the nude scene now I presume.
- whojaybe, on 12/23/2007, -3/+171Well, I will assume she didn't get naked. At least there would have been more than 48 total...
- neurosport, on 12/23/2007, -0/+147yes. time to release some sex tapes ...
- jake8689, on 12/23/2007, -0/+131i am more surprised Jessica Simpson had a new movie
- inactive, on 12/23/2007, -2/+122Look for it in the $0.99 rental specials by February.
- kidcodea, on 12/23/2007, -0/+109u broke my sarcasm-o-meter
- smurf22, on 12/23/2007, -6/+100I thought it said 348 million at first. My first thought after that was holy ***** she made a porn?!
- inotocracy, on 12/23/2007, -2/+82I'm sure it would have done just as poorly but it was only released on EIGHT theaters total, and in Texas. Also.. I didn't even know she had a new movie coming out, its probably safe to say there was nil advertising done before hand.
- solarweasel, on 12/23/2007, -10/+86buried for inaccurate...
as much as you all dislike jessica simpson, rottentomatoes.com reports that the theatrical release of the movie isn't until January 22, 2008 (http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1189478-blonde_amb ... this must have been some sort of unadvertised preview because i know there are more than 48 brainless americans out there - robche, on 12/23/2007, -0/+6950% of those people were young teen couples going to the movies for the sake of making out
- XxATAROTHxX, on 12/23/2007, -0/+65Why just soft porn?
- whiplash3, on 12/23/2007, -1/+63Yep. That sure is what the article said.
- morningblur, on 12/23/2007, -0/+58To be fair, a lot of people feel uncomfortable masturbating in public. I think the DVD release will do better.
- duggtodeath, on 12/23/2007, -1/+55Oh, that's a really useful device!
- AoiTakuma, on 12/23/2007, -15/+62Shut up ***** up and set your preferences to tech news only you elitist prick
- DemonSpawn77, on 12/23/2007, -1/+47Those 48 people probably don't know the difference between chicken and fish either.
- w00t4me, on 12/23/2007, -4/+50It has to do with the movie because it was released in theaters in Texas and Texans hate Jessica Simpson.
- ChaosProfessor, on 12/23/2007, -0/+46They will bundle it with a good movie
- D3koy, on 12/23/2007, -0/+44She had an old movie? Must have missed that one too...
- pandawa, on 12/23/2007, -2/+44Is this movie even going to be pirated?
- jake8689, on 12/23/2007, -2/+39i smell an oscar
- epj3, on 12/23/2007, -3/+39At least one of those people had a camera to put on a torrent site.
- xike, on 12/23/2007, -2/+38No? I was going to offer you a million dollars to. Oh well, any other takers?
- drakenlot, on 12/23/2007, -1/+35A million dollars is useless if you kill yourself before receiving it.
Give the money up front and a month to blow it all, and you have a deal. - DiggUmFrog, on 12/23/2007, -0/+32Your comment's diggs alone has practically doubled the ticket sold.
- inactive, on 12/23/2007, -0/+32This movie probably isn't even worth the bandwidth.
- DaisyFresh, on 12/23/2007, -0/+31Oh we haven't, just don't like Jessica Simpson that's all.
- Dylson, on 12/23/2007, -0/+30HOOOOOT? What are u? An owl?
- silent, on 12/23/2007, -0/+30Jessica, her family, and the movie critics. Sounds about right.
- coheedcollapse, on 12/23/2007, -0/+30Nah. One guy would smuggle a camera in and all the internet people who wanted to see it could download it the following day. We're crafty like that.
- Unreal595, on 12/23/2007, -1/+30I'm guessing the whole production crew had a blonde ambition too.
- skinrock, on 12/23/2007, -1/+30Cost is already past tense.
- das7282, on 12/23/2007, -0/+27Exactly what I was thinking.
- rome747, on 12/23/2007, -2/+29Because one is never enough.
- inactive, on 12/23/2007, -1/+27try January
- jamesb0i, on 12/23/2007, -3/+28if she was naked, i would even go see it
- Chongo, on 12/23/2007, -1/+24Part of my actual job is to know when movies are coming out (for magazine publications, etc). this is the first movie that I have ever not known about.
- dav0, on 12/23/2007, -5/+28mmm, schaudenfraude.
- maabus, on 12/23/2007, -1/+23I'd pay $8 to watch her in a feature-length version of 2girls1cup alongside Paris Hilton.
- Firehed, on 12/23/2007, -1/+23Probably by Christmas.
- drakenlot, on 12/23/2007, -0/+21I know, I wouldn't watch it if you paid me!
-
Show 51 - 100 of 397 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is