What is Digg?105 Comments
- Nathrat, on 10/22/2008, -1/+47Still bummed that there's no Terrence Howard. I hate actor swaps of significant characters. It only worked in "The Dark Knight" cause Katie Holmes sucked to begin with.
- CCB0x45, on 10/22/2008, -0/+24The mini gun needs to be way bigger, think:
http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff304/Stillmati ...
If they were gonna change the ***** character though they definitely shoulda picked this guy:
http://freakcomics.com/images/wwcon_2006/war_machi ... - HeatVision, on 10/22/2008, -1/+24You're lame and clunky.
It's CONCEPT ART, which means it hasn't gone through the refinement an approved design would go through and for CONCEPT ART it looks great. - aolshove, on 10/22/2008, -2/+24Yeah, firing off a mini-gun next to your head seems like a bad idea.... conceptually.
- leif777, on 10/22/2008, -1/+17ever see someone fire a rocket launcher?
- dubvulture, on 10/22/2008, -0/+14the stealth one looks very anime mecha...the legs at least
- reyoo30309, on 10/22/2008, -1/+15"Does it come in black?"
Oh, wait... wrong movie. - Overcyn, on 10/22/2008, -0/+14or did she?
- reyoo30309, on 10/22/2008, -0/+14I hate that swap too. But lucky for all of us she died anyway so no biggie.
- dsoldier, on 10/22/2008, -0/+11FTA: But before you get too excited, Saunders warns that “if there is a War Machine in [Iron Man 2], it’s unlikely to be this one.”
Yea don't get too excited. - Balanced, on 10/22/2008, -0/+10So... Sober?
- TheRedeemer, on 10/22/2008, -1/+10Just like your mom.
BUUUUUUUUUUURN!!! - erichw1504, on 10/22/2008, -0/+9Yea, title should read:
Iron Man: Official War Machine Concept Art (PICS) not for Iron Man 2 - AtraNoxVII, on 10/22/2008, -0/+8Bomb Vs. Person
Bomb Wins. - inactive, on 10/22/2008, -0/+8Maggie Gyllenhaal actually signed for a two picture deal, leading many to speculate why. Nolan obviously plans to bring her to the third film, and if it were only flashbacks, he wouldn't have to sign her for the two picture deal.
- Cyberdactyl, on 10/22/2008, -0/+7Exactly what I was thinking. Of course, most "cool" stuff in movies would be a design tragedy in reality .
- DeadPlasmaCell, on 10/22/2008, -0/+7Your... Your mom is 11 years old..
- AtraNoxVII, on 10/22/2008, -1/+7Was that even English?
- blackbeardtron, on 10/22/2008, -0/+6Yes.
- inactive, on 10/22/2008, -1/+6I guess I'm the opposite of you guys, AnthonyFTMFW and MaTT2011, I'd rather they use good actresses in roles than girls I'd like to *****. That's a huge problem with movies and music today. People like you will pay for mediocre entertainment as long as it has a pretty face. For example, when Baywatch was big in the 90's I had a couple of friends that loved it. I gave it a shot, and it was terrible. The acting was horrid, the plot was terrible, and it was probably one of the worst shows I had ever seen. Wen I asked them they said "this show is awesome, look at all the titties!" My response: Watch porn for the *****, and make real shows good. Same for music. Almost every single pop star now is the same pretty face, with the same boring computerized songs. I hate pop crap, yet guys I know will sit through a sucky Brittany video just to see her. I've noticed in my life, that the uglier a person is, the better their music seems to be. The less a film focuses on *****, and the more it focuses on the plot, the better the movie tends to be. If you want to see *****, watch a porn, stop calling for terrible actress you want to ***** to be in movies.
/rant over. - ka0tic, on 10/22/2008, -0/+5Wheres the PROTON CANNON?
- MaTT2011, on 10/22/2008, -3/+8I would take sucky acting from Katie any day rather than having to look at that horse faced ugliness from shoe face (aka Maggie).
The character was only supposed to be a hot piece of ass anyways, something that the audience would believe Dent would go crazy for, literally, and that batman would do anything for. Looking at shoe face there its hard to see how those characters would be motivated to do anything aside from maybe buying a couple drinks. - dalittle, on 10/22/2008, -0/+5Are they going to bring Terrence Howard back yet?
- keitarofujiwara, on 10/22/2008, -0/+5*uncomfortable silence*
- HeatVision, on 10/22/2008, -0/+4A serious response?
No, it was a stupid response to a stupid statement, chosen to reflect the idiocy of your comments. Saying something is "lame" is lazy and it's the crap that spews out of 10-year olds commenting on YouTube. It's not that your opinion differs from mine, it is that there is no thought behind it and yes, you should try "better" next time. You English good. - VinnieDaMac, on 10/22/2008, -0/+4Both Terrance Howard and Don Cheadle are great actors, but Terrance is just way more badass than Don and would have made a much better War Machine.
- Sornos, on 10/22/2008, -0/+4Leave at 1.
- s00p33, on 10/22/2008, -2/+6Needs more guns! .... Still badass though.
- bicyclethief, on 10/22/2008, -1/+4"You ever play roulette? ... Always bet on black."
- inactive, on 10/22/2008, -0/+3Thank you, I knew I wasn't the only one who felt that way.
- bignerd, on 10/23/2008, -0/+3The Iron Man movie must be the 1st time you've heard of Iron Man... Notice the similarities below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_man
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_machine
So, nah, I don't think they'll be changing the face... - Suits, on 10/22/2008, -0/+3Too bad Terrence Howard is being replaced by Don Cheadle as War Machine. :/
Don Cheadle...sucks. - Billions, on 10/22/2008, -0/+3I don't see Terrance Howard hidden in that concept art, so I'm skeptical. Worst thing to happen since Vinnie Chase passed on Aquaman 2.
- chromerium, on 10/23/2008, -0/+2They are. Didn't you know? I've paid off my mortgage using Diggs.
- mmx2000, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2I'm going to digg it up just to piss YOU off.
- nebbyfoshebby, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2lol
- zprima, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2pure awesomeness
- fingaz, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2Hahaha...sometimes I forget that show isn't real.
- anixmander, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2I think it looks like a very good cross between the comic version of War Machine, and the movie Iron Man. For a concept design, it is a great start.
- wizzroom, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2hahahah fat tony
- EvoIII8, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2Awwwwwwww Yeaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!!!
- magusat999, on 10/23/2008, -0/+2Correct me if I'm wrong - but aren't YOU on the computer too?
- Mr.Gone, on 10/22/2008, -1/+3Who the ***** didn't see these in the special features of the disk? Really Babyman? The power you wield should be done so with a iota of responsibility okay?
- Ghoztt, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2Ok... it's a comic... but with that level of technology I think Tony Stark would engineer the helmet to be sound proof - yet have stereo microphones with a volume limiter on the internal speakers.
-Geek out. - Davers, on 10/22/2008, -2/+4I don't like it - it's just the Iron Man suit slightly tweaked. They could have at least made the "mask"/face area look different so that it would give it a different personality.
- HeatVision, on 10/23/2008, -0/+2Hey, you wanted me to respond and justify my comments, so obviously you wanted an argument. Don't get all pissy because you wanked out an ill-conceived opinion and someone called you on it.
- rolf, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2Not to be a nagging killjoy, but the gun looks like it's going to block about 40% of his sight, nearly the entire right side....
I can't see how that will be good for fighting. - icdapoakr, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2You would have a point if you were firing hundreds of rockets next to your head. It's much more noise and last longer.
/thats what she said - RaulMuadDib, on 10/22/2008, -1/+3"Wall-E"
Oops - FlyCO, on 10/22/2008, -0/+2The second Black Sabbath's studio album has a track called "Iron Man", released THIRTY EIGHT years before the first movie's debut. Coincidence?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 106 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
