digg

Join DiggAbout

Donkeys and Elephants and Delegates,oh my!
Check out the most popular Elections 2008 content on Digg.

Ghostbusters vs. Jesus

toadking.com — Title says it all!

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • TeamoSupremo, on 10/10/2007, -13/+35I feel like I've just been mauled by Jesus
  • Infantrydude, on 10/25/2007, -70/+11Someone is going to be smoking a turd in hell for that one!
    • thejoker86, on 10/25/2007, -19/+57agreed, jesus is my favourite fictional character
      • nreynolds, on 10/25/2007, -24/+15there's very little doubt that Jesus existed, you know...
        • capiCrimm, on 10/25/2007, -14/+5there's also very little doubt that you exist, so whats your point?
        • Dralha, on 10/25/2007, -14/+13Actually, you're completely wrong. There is no evidence that jesus was a real person. All evidence points to a fictional mythical hero-figure made up by a talented author, the ancient equivalent of J.R.R. Tolkien or J.K. Rowling.
          • Tabris, on 10/25/2007, -4/+6What evidence? Christianity is the only one that declares him fully human and fully divine.
          • Rukaribe, on 10/25/2007, -3/+7There are official Roman records saying Jesus was real. There is quite a bit of parallell evidence from sources that aren't the Bible that say he was a real person. Most everyone agrees Jesus was a real person, it's everything else people don't agree on. I am not a big religious person or anything, but you really should get your facts straight. If anything Jesus was a follower of John the Baptist.

            There actually were quite a few people like Jesus back in the day. Imagine back then with no real science to explain most things, if you see lightening or feel and earthquake what are you going to think? Usually when the Romans would cruicify someone for building up a following if it got too large they would not only kill the leader but also all their followers. This is recorded many times, and since only Jesus was killed and not his followers it means his following must not have been very large.

            This is actually kind of interesting because if he wasn't a very prominent leader back then the fact that his following turned into the biggest religion in the world is rather remarkable. Especially after all the set backs early Christianity faced. Pointless Religious studies electives FTW!
          • Otto, on 10/25/2007, -3/+5@Rukaribe: "There are official Roman records saying Jesus was real."

            Actually, no, there are not. The Romans were pretty meticulous record keepers, and most of their records survived, however there's no surviving records that mention any Jesus in a way that would suggest that it's the same Jesus from the bible. The records that *should* exist, don't.

            As for the other sources mentioning Jesus, most of them are forgeries, having been added to those works by various monks in the 4th-8th centuries. Those that are not blatent forgeries are questionable at best.

            The fact of the matter is that there is no actual credible evidence to confirm the existence of Jesus of Nazareth. Look it up yourself. Make sure to read both sides too, not just the side of the believers.
        • cfulp, on 10/10/2007, -6/+7For someone so popular, it is weird that nobody started writing about it for over 90 years after he died.
      • anjinash, on 10/25/2007, -12/+10There's little doubt I exist either, but that doesn't mean I'm the son of God.
    • FrozenGonad, on 10/25/2007, -7/+13How exactly does one go about smoking a turd? Must one dry it out and drill a hole in it first? I eagerly anticipate your reply while I ponder the problem further...
    • badjoke, on 10/25/2007, -4/+14Maybe you roll it in paper.
    • thejoker86, on 10/10/2007, -10/+5lol, or maybe he is just ignorant and cant tell the difference between steam and smoke.
    • badjoke, on 10/10/2007, -11/+3It's just a phrase...
    • sabach, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1Beware evil-doers, here he comes to save the day, Son'o'God is on his way!!!!
    • LonesomeFighter, on 10/10/2007, -3/+2question. if Jews go to this Hell, and Jesus was a Jew, why would one care what they say or make a picture of him for?
    • luvkit, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Whatever, Jesus is laughing His ass off at this one. You can't have kids without having a sense of humor.
  • jewdiknight, on 10/25/2007, -19/+338I ain't afraid of no Christ.
    • xboxgamer91, on 10/25/2007, -10/+32You win sir!
    • twisterrust, on 10/25/2007, -20/+8I hope you are not tricking us all by putting a double neg ;)
    • koko775, on 10/25/2007, -7/+67Don't you mean "I ain't afraid of no Holy Ghost"? =P
    • Waskonator, on 10/25/2007, -4/+22Anyone else catch the humor/irony in this guys name?

      rofl...
    • woody56292, on 10/25/2007, -4/+13nominated for greatest comment of the year.
      • Slayz0r, on 10/25/2007, -5/+4Here's my guitar made from the wood of Christ's cross
        oh here comes a billion emails from those offended religious weirdos
        what's offensive about the most religious instrument ever?
    • Simplogic, on 10/25/2007, -2/+2diggin' makes me feel good!
    • shieldsmw, on 10/25/2007, -0/+3i ain't afraid of no Host.
  • badjoke, on 10/25/2007, -36/+13Who ya gonna call?! Christ. Busters!
  • akinnee, on 10/25/2007, -17/+4waaaaaaaaat?
  • flacnvinyl, on 10/25/2007, -35/+16How is this front page worthy?
    • Puppetfunk, on 10/25/2007, -7/+37How is this not Front Page Worthy!?
      • FrozenGonad, on 10/25/2007, -13/+8Probably cause he's a Jebus boy and is offended.
        • Reziarfg, on 10/25/2007, -4/+16It's the US, we're allowed to offend people. Although how long that'll last is anyone's guess...
          • capiCrimm, on 10/10/2007, -7/+6hey, look on the bright side. Even if they take away the first admendment it just means the government has the right to offend its citizens.
      • Nowaiman, on 10/10/2007, -14/+2It sucks that's why
    • Pootle4rthur, on 10/10/2007, -9/+4I agree
      there are better and funnier things done on b3ta every day
    • wirelesshnic, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Is this true?
      Yes, Its True....
      This Man has No Dick
  • arapro, on 10/10/2007, -25/+3JAJAJAJAJA .... thats great ...
    who you gonna call ?
    george bush the cruzader or his brother Vigo Von Homburg Deutschendorf ?
  • LavaHot, on 10/10/2007, -14/+5The question is, who wins?
    • j0ker666, on 10/10/2007, -4/+6Ghostbusters of course!!
    • insomniac8400, on 11/05/2007, -6/+3LOL, you had to ask? Of course Ghostbusters.
    • UglieJosh, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Yea, Ghostbusters have weapons and Jesus just has a bunch of pub-magic tricks.
  • FrozenGonad, on 10/10/2007, -12/+58Imagine being "slimed" by Jebus...
  • canthraxp, on 10/10/2007, -21/+81Why everyone is so lazy to type some content, why is that "The title says all" is so common? Have you ever read a newspaper header like: title: "Grampa' with a shotgun goes nuts in a local store n' *****" content: "Title says it all!"
    • capiCrimm, on 10/10/2007, -4/+31Newspaper, no. TV News, yes.
    • brycelb, on 10/10/2007, -10/+4Boo Hoo!
    • eclectro, on 10/10/2007, -7/+24Because the phrase "Let's troll the Christians again" would be too obvious.
      • insomniac8400, on 10/10/2007, -7/+5Troll christians, thats umpossible.
        • bkemper, on 10/10/2007, -5/+4barely literate, or ASL? Might want to try the spell check next time.
        • crazedgremlin, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5@bkemper,
          he was referencing Ralph Wiggum from the Simpsons, "Me fail English, that's umpossible!"
          As proof of this, I give you http://www.umpossible.com/
        • praisethelard, on 06/06/2008, -0/+2Hmm...Isn't it "unpossible"?
          • insomniac8400, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Umpossible is a perfectly crommulent word.
    • wstrucke, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4in a newspaper the article is beneath the headline. in the case of a newspaper printing a picture, it would typically only have a caption under it (e.g. the "title").

      internet != newspaper
    • Cerialthriller, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5i think the only case in which "Title says it all!" is appropriate is when the word Goatse is in the title.
  • ProphetSix, on 10/10/2007, -5/+119Ray... If someone asks you if you are a God you say YES!
  • bonk2k, on 10/10/2007, -23/+6dont cross the beams!
    • DrunkPrimate, on 10/10/2007, -4/+21I'm sorry but you are a fool .....
      THE LINE IS .....
      DON'T CROSS THE STREAMS!
    • bethlagarrison, on 10/10/2007, -3/+16STREAMS, not BEAMS

      If you're going to be so nerdy as to quote Ghostbusters on Digg, at least do it right
      • brycelb, on 10/10/2007, -15/+1How about we all stop being NERDY and end this stupid post!
    • james411, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1Um... I think he meant beams. As in the beams to make a cross... you know... that Jebus was nailed to.
    • MadScientist420, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4@james, no I think he is just an idiot.
    • bonk2k, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1getting roasted by the digg Nerd Squad feels like getting mauled by Jesus while crossing the streams from my proton pack.
  • iloveazngurlzs, on 10/10/2007, -21/+1HIS POWERS ARE TO IMMACULATE! we are gonna have to cross the beams!
  • jxdx, on 10/10/2007, -22/+11Don't see how this is funny...
  • JRjJ106, on 10/10/2007, -6/+130Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
    Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?
    Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is New Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath-of-God type stuff.
    Mayor: Jesus Christ...
    • unloud, on 10/10/2007, -3/+10Good choice of quotage.
    • bkemper, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Aside from Revelations, there was considerably more wrath-of-God stuff in the Old Testament than the New. The New was all about forgiveness, loving thy neighbor, and turning the other cheek.
      • Rizmaster, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1I'm operating under the assumption that he misquoted the movie because Jesus is the topic of this digg. If he didn't he's a complete moron.
    • VitriolAndAngst, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0You forgot to had Bill Murray's great addition; "Ca'ts sleeping with Dogs..."
    • JTJ1210, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Dr. Peter Venkman: This city is headed for a disaster of biblical proportions.
      Mayor: What do you mean, "biblical"?
      Dr Ray Stantz: What he means is Old Testament, Mr. Mayor, real wrath-of-God type stuff.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Exactly.
      Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies. Rivers and seas boiling.
      Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness. Earthquakes, volcanoes...
      Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave.
      Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together - mass hysteria.
  • walliswizard, on 10/10/2007, -41/+10Mmm... can't imagine this so "funny" if it was anti-islam...
    I'm not religious, but this isn't funny, and I have NO idea why this is on Digg. Then again, Digg is becoming more like Flickr everyday, so it seems...
    • jxdx, on 10/10/2007, -20/+6Don't see how this got here either... retarded photo...
    • Uranium118, on 10/10/2007, -6/+22Jesus is in islam too you know...

      But I'm fair, I laugh at all religions equally.
      • badjoke, on 10/10/2007, -20/+1That's Mohammad.
        • jmpeagle, on 10/10/2007, -0/+18no, Jesus is ALSO in the Koran as are many Old Testament figures. Jesus is a revered prophet and insulting Jesus is an insult to Islam.
          • badjoke, on 10/10/2007, -5/+5Ah alright. Thanks.
          • BladeMelbourne, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2So if Jesus said that he was the messiah, but Muslims say he isn't, why do they consider him a "revered prophet"? Is lying acceptable in Islam?
          • nitramlliw, on 10/10/2007, -4/+3In the Quaran Jesus is pictured as a great prophet and teacher, but he is also (unlike the other prophets) never depicted sinning. this has long been a point of attack used by the Christian community on Islamic beliefs. It's ***** stupid. My parents force me to go to church. It sucks.
        • anjinash, on 10/10/2007, -6/+4Boo hoo. I could give a *****. Christians and Muslim alike, people take these overblown fairy tales too seriously. Whatever you believe, you need to be able to take a joke and relax. If we're truly offending a deity who has the power to damn us for eternity, then let said deity deal with us and go about your humorless life.
      • brycelb, on 10/10/2007, -4/+0Settle down Mr. Wizard!
    • Nowaiman, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3Time a post a picture of Richard Dawkins fighting Godzilla. He isn't real you know.
      • brycelb, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Too bad no one knows who you are talking about. He is not in the Bible!
    • brycelb, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6This Richard Dawkins stuff is tired. Your 2 billion christain friends have no idea who he is because they don't read!
  • joemofo214, on 10/10/2007, -6/+24Rick Moranis FTW!!!
    • texpundit, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2"I am the Keymaster."

      "I am the Gatekeeper."

      NOM NOM NOM
    • UglieJosh, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Honey, I Ghostbusted and shrunk my Spaceballs?
  • gfair, on 10/10/2007, -14/+8Why does the title always have to say it all these days? Why can't the description go into more detail anymore?
    • BlackCow, on 10/10/2007, -4/+12Because there isn't much you can describe about a picture without giving it away and there isn't a picture section on digg.
      • schmik07, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Well how about something in the description relating to the fact that this is a picture?

        The title doesn't say it all, because this could have been an article about ghostbusters vs jesus, or a flash game, or a video (especially as it's in the movie section). So actually there could have been more description without giving it away.
  • JRjJ106, on 10/10/2007, -13/+3Winston Zeddemore: Hey Ray. Do you believe in God?
    Dr Ray Stantz: Never met him.
    Winston Zeddemore: Yeah, well, I do. And I love Jesus's style, you know.
  • oneoverzero, on 10/10/2007, -11/+74shopped.
    • Waskonator, on 10/10/2007, -3/+19no no no. I saw this on History. It was a whole 12 hour bit about the first bible ever made. This was in there!!!
    • namelessperson, on 10/10/2007, -11/+3No ***** Sherlock!
  • Nowaiman, on 10/10/2007, -24/+6Digg just needs to hurry up and get a religion and atheist section so all annoying belief clashes can gtfo my front page.
    • FrozenGonad, on 10/10/2007, -4/+12Yeah, because separating different systems of belief always works out so well..
      • Nowaiman, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5I mean put them in their own section together so they can fight like a married couple
    • MeMongo, on 10/10/2007, -3/+6It worked out in Israel. . .um Germany. . .er Iraq. . .hmmm. . .India/Pakistan. . .ok, maybe it doesn't work out so well.
  • testic32, on 10/10/2007, -18/+0hurry up with that
    http://www.testi32.com/di/jethro-tull/index.php
  • Caleb83, on 10/10/2007, -12/+22Are we turning into fark with photoshop crap? I wanna digg this, look at my avatar. But I cannot. However I cannot bring myself to bury a ghostbusters post. So there you have it, I have not contributed at all.
    • CaptMonkey, on 10/10/2007, -3/+7This is actually from Fark, it's a few years old, though. The theme was "Set a movie in a different time period." The other really good one was Fisticuffs Club... http://home.socal.rr.com/bmakaryk/Fisticuffs-Club.jpg
      • MacEnvy, on 10/10/2007, -4/+3It is always interesting to me when I see Fark stuff from several years ago show up as new on digg. Warms my heart actually, to see a whole new audience exposed to it.
  • bluekill, on 10/10/2007, -21/+5I just have to say that I'm really sick of all these stupid pics making it to the front page.
  • xenovis, on 10/10/2007, -13/+5More like LLLOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLDDDDDDDD!
    Welcome to the internet
  • tnatharik, on 10/10/2007, -11/+2I felt more like, Harry Potter VS Jesus.
  • xivs, on 10/10/2007, -6/+8I love watching religious-based images cropping up now and again with the likes of this. Religious debate can go one for years and no one will ever get it right anyway... In the meantime - Digg is great for the responses you get to the images others dislike.

    And .. to this guy: "But I'm fair, I laugh at all religions equally." -- FFTW!
  • thickdrummer, on 10/10/2007, -10/+12WTF!? Why would Jesus try and take on the Ghostbusters?
    I guess he's not that smart after all!
  • Cowfrommars, on 10/10/2007, -17/+11The title doesn't ***** say it all.
    • dogbomb, on 10/10/2007, -12/+6Actually, in this case, the title does say it all.
  • tyywebb, on 10/10/2007, -13/+4I dugg it the first time. . . . and I'll digg it again!
  • MarkTaiwan, on 10/10/2007, -12/+1http://duggmirror.com/movies/Ghostbusters_vs_Jesus
  • MarkTaiwan, on 10/10/2007, -12/+1http://duggmirror.com/movies/Ghostbusters_vs_Jesus
  • zolaar, on 10/10/2007, -12/+3Religious types do not at all understand the inevitable outcome when a boy** who 1) has resolved he *will* become a Ghostbuster when he grows up, and 2) has a *wicked* case of ADD, is told to draw a picture of himself meeting/interacting with the Holy Spirit.

    Well, they didn't, at least. Not before second grade....

    ** - same boy who, in fourth grade, resolved he *will* become a ninja turtle when he grows up, and would try to climb into every open manhole he encountered
  • Feep, on 10/10/2007, -4/+29I found this on YTMND about a year ago, and laughed so incredibly hard, I actually went a screen-printed it on a white T-shirt. I wear it around sometimes these days, when I feel brave, because the University of Florida has a ton of religious crazy people.
  • ThecNiqueMan, on 10/10/2007, -2/+30Ray: Where do these stairs go?
    Peter: They go up.
  • play150, on 10/10/2007, -5/+10Wow I actually laughed for a while at this.
    • ThinkBox, on 10/10/2007, -2/+2nah it could say that the bottom was cropped so you couldnt see the Something Awful.com tag
  • daeyeth, on 10/10/2007, -12/+8For once the title does say it all.
  • Apoy, on 10/10/2007, -19/+5this is not funny
  • greenriver572, on 10/10/2007, -11/+3yeah, my old band played a show with some other bands who made a flier out of this about a year and a half ago.
    • BladeMelbourne, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4Congratulations. Do you want a cookie or something? Fu(|
  • UtopiaInTheSky, on 10/10/2007, -10/+0I thought Jesus was a member of the Ghostbusters?
    • MainMor, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1Don't you know anything? Jesus has giant eagles wings, and he is singin' lead vocals for Lynyrd Skynyrd with like an angel band and I'm in the front row and I'm hammered drunk!
  • Misinformant, on 10/10/2007, -13/+4Sacrilicious!
  • SkullPizza, on 10/10/2007, -12/+3Old pic is OLD. I've had this on my comp for a good 6 months at least. Welcome to YTMND everyone
  • CeeJayDK, on 10/10/2007, -10/+2Today : Jesus
    Tomorrow : The Holy Spirit
  • MattBlackCat, on 10/10/2007, -5/+8Ten people witnessed a free-roaming, vaporous, full-torso apparition.

    I count 11
    • WoollyMittens, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Maybe one wasn't paying attention?
  • winsall, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3im sure jesus would cross the streams, just to piss them off.
  • Septimus, on 10/10/2007, -12/+6Wonder why no one does something similar with mohammed?

    Oh yeah... they're even more uptight. Good pic, I gather old but I don't care as I haven't seen it and it made me laugh.
    • MacEnvy, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5I'd laugh at one about Mohammad, though it wouldn't be as culturally relevent to the majority of diggers. Instead of snarking, you could make one and post it. If it's good we'll digg it up.

      See how that works?
  • inked, on 10/10/2007, -13/+4This has to be the dumbest picture and comments I have seen on Digg
  • eclectro, on 10/10/2007, -16/+33Why use an expensive proton pack when nails would be so much cheaper and easier??
    • Dazabrit, on 10/10/2007, -12/+7I actually cried with laughter when I read this!!!!!!!!!! This deffo should win comment of the year!
    • patientXero, on 10/10/2007, -2/+1You are so wrong for that, but I am laughing in my cube as I type this. . .
    • grav3k33p3r, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1nice comment =)
  • eddywolf, on 10/10/2007, -9/+3Genius
  • Spr0k3t, on 10/10/2007, -4/+3Love it!!! Buried for lame ass description.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 101 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.