11 Comments
- lanemik, on 11/06/2008, -0/+9Maybe because it was one of the worst movies of all time?
Just thinking out loud here. - ASfinkterSezWut, on 11/06/2008, -0/+7The only "Sequel" that would make sense here would be a "Prequel".
- AmyVernon, on 11/06/2008, -0/+6didn't this movie get panned?
- vofuse, on 11/06/2008, -0/+6She's out of focus when she dies in the background. I thought that was done on purpose to explain why she would be alive for a sequel, so they could say the bullet actually grazed her instead of hitting her dead on.
- gwaggy12, on 11/07/2008, -0/+5The premise for the comic was so much cooler. I really can't figure out why they ditched it for the crap movie storyline.
- Drakoi, on 11/07/2008, -0/+3that director sucked, hence the movie was a disappointment.
- dngermouse, on 11/07/2008, -0/+3that movie just didn't make any sense at all, even though I'm a fan of slow-mo gun fight films, that movie just seemed so over the top, especially when that red car flipped over and shot the guy through the sun roof.. i mean come on... so corny..
- Seemefearme, on 11/06/2008, -1/+4I am not a fan of Angelina Jolie nor do I believe she made the movie nor do I believe a second movie would be worse off without her.
- xirkonia, on 11/07/2008, -2/+5Um, everyone died at the end. Except the main character of course. So it's not just Angelina Jolie who killed the sequel. Oh sorry, I forgot, SPOILER ALERT!
- MazdaEric, on 11/07/2008, -0/+2I didn't realize this film was big enough to warrant a sequel
- duggtodeath, on 11/07/2008, -0/+1Who cares? She died in the first one...unless...God no...not a prequel!!!



What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official