What is Digg?Sponsored by HTC
Who knows you better than your phone? view!
youtube.com - See you from the perspective of your phone.
42 Comments
- mrwright613, on 11/12/2009, -1/+98ok, we get it, you like jim carrey's site.
- Methusalah, on 11/12/2009, -0/+41I accidentally started reading this article, but quickly remembered that I couldn't care less.
- drethedog, on 11/12/2009, -0/+32Here 1 page and condensed:
Jim Carrey: Rocks
Arnold Schwarzenegger: Sucks
Tom Cruise: Sucks
Benicio Del Toro: Sucks
Burt Reynolds: Sucks
Christopher Lambert: Sucks
Jamie Kennedy: Sucks
M Night Shyamalan : Sucks - warcin, on 11/12/2009, -0/+25Obviously written by the designer of Jim Carrey's web site
- BigLou, on 11/12/2009, -2/+24Wow, I didn't realize there were so many Jim Carreys in show business! They all have remarkably similar websites too...
- lantza, on 11/12/2009, -1/+21I want my 5 minutes back.
- capheine, on 11/12/2009, -1/+16Best: none of them
Worst: all of them - bubba9999, on 11/12/2009, -0/+12Article: Sucks
- ChronicColonic, on 11/12/2009, -0/+11Reported. Your time on Digg has been a short one. Please don't come back.
- TheSickboy, on 11/12/2009, -1/+12Good spot. It's a bit subtle...
- tdogg241, on 11/12/2009, -0/+10They left out Abe Vigoda's super-awesome page:
http://www.abevigoda.com - ziplizard, on 11/12/2009, -1/+9I'm very proud of myself for spotting that the "Best" site was always Jim Carrey's after the third one.
- provoko, on 11/12/2009, -1/+7Obviously an ad for Jim Carrey's website.... the site's news and other areas didn't even work for me. His twitter, daugthers band site and few other redirected sites worked just fine.
- Saprta, on 11/12/2009, -0/+6At first glance I thought it said "Best & Worst Star Wars Websites"
Not sure where my mind is today - representDLV, on 11/12/2009, -1/+6why?
- johnn11238, on 11/12/2009, -2/+6Oh My God!!! He has a link to his YouTube site??!!!! Wooo-Hoooo!!!
- fms45, on 11/12/2009, -9/+12Well, I think his site is masterpiece.
- gordonp, on 11/12/2009, -0/+3Burt Reynolds' site has been updated and working fine.
- diggbigwig, on 11/12/2009, -0/+3Asthetics - A+
Usability - C- - daltowned, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2i think i'll quote the author himself on this one;
"we don't need it pummeled into our brains, man" - RealmDown, on 11/12/2009, -1/+3Wil Wheaton's site is better.
- zekis, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2All the information you could ever want to know about this TV legend.
- chevriley, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2i think the whole anti flash thing is a bit 2000. well coded and with an purpose (cool aesthetics is enough) it's fine.
and i think carrey's site is cool. not so his recent work, but i like the site. - Snoogs, on 11/12/2009, -1/+3You spent 5 minutes on this site?? I'd ask for my 12 seconds back, but I'd end up wasting it on something just as mundane anyway.
- lantza, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2My connection is slow at work and I spent awhile waiting for pictures that never loaded.
- cryonix, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2So how long exactly do I have to wait for the robot to destroy Jim's site?
- diggbigwig, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2Hey! He used to be entertaining.
- shiidii, on 11/12/2009, -1/+3Definitely a paid advertisement article to promote jim carrey. And although his site is better than those mentioned, his website, a big busy flash jubilee is a bit outdated compared with what is being made today.
- ngrodey, on 11/12/2009, -1/+3Are we designing on functionality? Or Creativity?
Because I like Jim's site, but its not straight forward, and just because its crazy flashy doesn't mean its a good site.
PS. Get off of Jim Carrey's Balls, its gross. - Snoogs, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2Haha... when I had a slow connection, I was SO sure I'd get more done in my day with faster internet... all my 'extra' time has been donated to Digg... o_O
- Charlotte_Web, on 11/12/2009, -1/+2It is sort of astounding that so many big-name stars don't appreciate the value of a great website.
Even David Bowie, who was very quick to capitalize on the web to promote himself in the 90's, has a pretty awful website. And his welcome message hasn't changed since 2003.
http://www.davidbowie.com/ - ShustOne, on 11/12/2009, -3/+4Jim Carrey's site is pretty awesome. And he seems like a good guy. This article was pretty retarded though.
- MacroDaemon, on 11/12/2009, -4/+5Jim Carrey's website is incredible though.
- diggbigwig, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Did you really stick around long enough to get to the Burt Reynolds site?
- GalacticRerun, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Well the loading part of Jim Carrey's site lasted too long. So I'll never know how awesome it really is.
- toxicityj, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1same here. I came all prepared to bitch about Super Shadow's website http://www.supershadow.com/
- i23Photography, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Oh go back to watching the hamster dance...
- ziplizard, on 11/12/2009, -1/+1Combination of the Star Wars graffiti article and Star Wars themed comments on articles about the Motorola Droid?
- shadowmanjack, on 11/13/2009, -1/+1The worst one I have ever seen hands down is the one for Robin Shou, Chris Farley's brother in Beverly Hills Ninja:
http://www.robinshou.com/
The awful flash intro, the atrocious colors and the nonsensical navigation make it a good contender for wost website period. - dnields, on 11/12/2009, -3/+2The only cool celebrity web site: http://www.jeffbridges.com/
- mandarin, on 11/12/2009, -15/+13I hate Jim Carrey
- spworm, on 11/12/2009, -7/+5Carreys site might be super, but that much flash is a big no no.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is