What is Digg?Sponsored by Travelzoo
Take Advantage of Ridiculously Low Holiday Airfares view!
travelzoo.com - Flights $52 and up for Thanksgiving, Christmas & New Year. But move on it now.
43 Comments
- bonk2k, on 01/26/2009, -1/+41Is it just me or is the description for this article seem almost entirely nonsensical?
- dawgma, on 01/26/2009, -1/+23"Oscar for is one thing - Oscar in is quite another."
What the hell does this sentence mean? - viaphone, on 01/25/2009, -1/+17Yeah, I heard there was only one Oscar to win the Oscar. Lucky one!
- cognizantkid, on 01/26/2009, -1/+10What a terribly written article.
- akchrs, on 01/25/2009, -1/+9Donnie Yen for Ip man?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qhPDEOYbx4 - GreatIdeaMan, on 01/26/2009, -0/+8Your grammar isn't.
- clickwir, on 01/26/2009, -0/+6nope, still doesn't make sense.
- oridzinal, on 01/25/2009, -0/+5Why mom have not named me as well.
- Diggnabbit, on 01/26/2009, -0/+5You're right. It is seem almost entirely nonsensical.
- oridzinal, on 01/25/2009, -0/+4How could I miss this film! Gone to look..
Anyway it's not about the OSCAR. - BigT383, on 01/26/2009, -0/+4I'm Oscar. Dot Com.
- inactive, on 01/26/2009, -0/+4Yes. And after looking at the article I can't understand why I'd even bother reading it. Honestly.
- idigidug, on 01/26/2009, -0/+4Is a joke. Seeing people support her was pathetic. Not all Americans are idiots.
- scottk59, on 01/26/2009, -0/+4Is a dumbass.
- akchrs, on 01/26/2009, -3/+6Winning an Oscar FOR being in a movie is different than winning an Oscar for being IN a movie.
- Diggnabbit, on 01/26/2009, -0/+3"Oscar for..." is one thing. "Oscar in..." is quite another.
- farfromhere, on 01/26/2009, -0/+3My brain hurts.
- trafficlight, on 01/26/2009, -0/+3Yo Dawg I herd you like Oscars so...
- Mo0eY, on 01/26/2009, -1/+4Actually, that grammar is better than what YouTube commenters say.
How is babby formed? - firedrillduckie, on 01/26/2009, -1/+4I have no idea what this article was trying to tell me.
- inactive, on 01/26/2009, -0/+3Just like your mom.
- 2of8, on 01/26/2009, -1/+4I don't get any of this.
- homescrubb, on 01/26/2009, -0/+2you're not helping
- simonsez21, on 01/26/2009, -3/+5What?
- Lumbre619, on 01/26/2009, -0/+2Thank You, Thank You. I would like to thank...*background music starts playing*
- CanadaMan87, on 01/26/2009, -0/+2The author of the article has a strange way of writing. I stopped reading it after the first couple paragraphs.
- idigidug, on 01/26/2009, -0/+2No doubt it was a good performance, but hardly the mortal lock most claim it is, nor should it be. I enjoyed the film, but it was not Oscar worthy for best picture.
- llamagod, on 01/26/2009, -0/+2Don't worry, you only have to read the ***** article a few times over to understand what it's about.
- gcauthon, on 01/26/2009, -0/+1Wow, thanks for clearing up all of the confusion. Now it makes perfect sense.
- allatti2d, on 01/26/2009, -1/+2Sheesh, rta! It's talking about the Academy Awards Ceremony vs. movies that contain scenes from (or are about) fictional Academy Awards. Thus, Oscar *for* vs. Oscar *in* ... and in my opinion, this is a pretty dumb article, especially when its author doesn't realize how important little things like italics or underlines can be. But even besides that, WHY ARE PEOPLE IN THE DIGG COMMUNITY DIGGING THIS ARTICLE??
Are there no interesting techie or political pages out there today? Slow Sunday, I guess.
:P - dronkmunk, on 01/26/2009, -1/+2It's not that hard to get. It's a list of film scenes in which a character is presented an Oscar.
- bonk2k, on 01/26/2009, -0/+1does* I have no idea how I missed that.
/selffacepalm - idigidug, on 01/26/2009, -0/+1Raquel Welch was unbelievably gorgeous back in the day.
- clickwir, on 01/26/2009, -0/+1this "article" sucks. This isn't for digg. Bring back the tech articles that built digg. This tabloid ***** is for the birds.
- TheVirus, on 01/26/2009, -1/+1***** Boston.
- peterinjapan, on 01/26/2009, -1/+1Oh, I love trash.
I love it because it's trash! - jc7012, on 01/26/2009, -1/+1This is a very poorly written article.
- tmiller158, on 01/26/2009, -2/+2Arrrr...(Rubs his eyes and looks tired) But...explain to me how cultural exchanges are Intellectual Property again? Death to Digital Rights Management and the profiteers, who propagate that greedy ideology, Long live free creative mediums like youtube.com.
- jerstud56, on 01/26/2009, -8/+8These comments suck.
- funnylutefisk, on 01/26/2009, -3/+3There better than youtube comments.
- mariathepirate, on 01/26/2009, -4/+2What.
- akchrs, on 01/26/2009, -6/+1Have you seen Ip Man?
- fireheartster, on 01/26/2009, -7/+2I saw the word Oscar, and I was like ... Heath Ledger.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is