digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Dodge reveals new 600 HP track-ready "ACR" version of Dodge Viper SRT10

jalopnik.com — Dodge will reveal the new track-ready version of the Dodge Viper SRT10 ACR at the LA Auto Show this upcoming week. What makes this beast of a car special is not only is it legal for track use, but it's still legal for the streets.

Who dugg this? Made popular Nov 8, 2007

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

33 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • euro22, on 12/17/2008, -0/+22Holy ***** that thing looks mean. I bet it runs on kittens and uses the tears of orphan children as its oil.
  • po43292, on 11/11/2007, -0/+21Yes, I'm looking to replace my 98 Honda Civic.
  • xcheats, on 11/09/2007, -0/+8That looks bad ass, but where are the ultra high res. pictures for my dual monitor background goodness?
  • KennMac, on 11/09/2007, -0/+8I can't stop laughing from this comment... Even funnier is that you threw a Neon in there...
  • KennMac, on 11/09/2007, -0/+6Digg has more trolls than YouTube now...
  • winmywii, on 11/09/2007, -0/+5Not that it couldn't happen. I have seen evo's well over 600hp. But your going to end up spending just as much in parts and repairs as you would buying the viper. Plus its a viper(it's badass).
  • frozenpxl, on 11/08/2007, -0/+4And the seats are made with the fur of that two legged dog.
  • idiggitall, on 11/09/2007, -0/+4The best looking Viper yet. I'm in love. I bet she purrs nicely.
  • KennMac, on 11/09/2007, -2/+6What's your point? Why are we looking at numbers for the Charger Vs. an Evo? The SRT10 Viper is used in professional racing all over the world. Notice how they don't use a Charger or a Lancer?
  • shredswithpiks, on 11/09/2007, -0/+4hey lancers (EVOs, rather) are used in professional racing all the time....
  • sfinney180, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2been a fan of the viper for years and there they go again improving it making me want one even more damn you dodge
  • shredswithpiks, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2hahaha...

    completely different classes of racing, buddy. those EVOs, STIs, and SRT4s wouldn't be competing with the ACR. There's no way you're going to get one of those to compete for raw times on half the price let alone compete in a sanctioned race. When was the last time you saw one of those sport compacts beat a viper in some american lemans style race?
  • rhgtp, on 11/08/2007, -0/+2That drivers side stripe looks bad ass as hell! Very nice, but will it be better than the blue devil corvette?
  • TheMidnight, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2Oh come on, just add a spoiler, fart cannon, stickers, tinted windows and go-faster stripes, and you'll be tearing up the tarmac and showing that Viper what-for in no time. Keep the Honda!

    /sarcasm
  • po43292, on 11/09/2007, -0/+2and you don't need an 6" exhaust tip and NOS stickers all over it to make it "faster".
  • DirkDiggz, on 11/09/2007, -1/+3Info is incorrect. Srt8 line comes with 425hp/420torque, runs 0-60 low5secs-high4secs. And to top it off you can hit 165+ with 3 people in the car, in a evo you'd be lucky to even get 3 people to fit comfortably. btw heres a vid of me hitting 170 on my srt8. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od6mHt1bHmI
  • TheMidnight, on 11/08/2007, -0/+1Hell yeah, that looks like it could qualify for Project Satan.
  • TheMidnight, on 11/08/2007, -0/+1Feh. I like my Dodge Charger R/T. It's almost as fast as the SRT-8 and gets much, much better mileage for a much, much lower price.
  • TheMidnight, on 11/08/2007, -0/+1The Charger was used by Dodge in racing for 2005-2006 (Tomorrow-something), when it was replaced by the Avenger, which is a shorter Charger essentially.
  • RizenBB, on 11/08/2007, -0/+1New Vipers have variable valve timing.
  • frozenpxl, on 11/08/2007, -1/+2Speak in mini-van please.
  • ChromaVita, on 11/08/2007, -0/+1The front and rear wing are for downforce. It would not literally be flying anywhere.
  • PanicAK, on 11/09/2007, -0/+1Viper has always been my (achievable) dream car since I was a kid. Some day, sigh...
  • pfloraday, on 11/08/2007, -0/+0Sweet!
  • Bizzies, on 05/25/2008, -0/+0http://digitalmediaplayer.wordpress.com http://smittybiltbumper.wordpress.com http://melissadougtoy.wordpress.com
    http://clothbabydiapers.wordpress.com http://gracoquattrostroller.wordpress.com http://wirelessrouters.wordpress.com
    http://tomtomgpsnavigator.wordpress.com http://flipvideocamcorder.wordpress.com http://baglessvacuumcleaner.wordpress.com
    http://kitchenaidprofessionalmixer.wordpress.com http://calphaloncookwares.wordpress.com http://sleepingbags.wordpress.com
    http://yogurtmaker.wordpress.com http://breadmaker.wordpress.com http://cordlessdrilldriver.wordpress.com
    http://pricelistreview.org http://pricelistreviews.org http://hotshoppinglive.com http://tax-attorney-guides.com http://dui-lawyer-manual.com
  • heystoopid, on 11/09/2007, -2/+1but not six valves per cylinder given the large piston diameter meaning more effective inlet/scavenging cycles thus equating to many more ponies then the current cheap set up !
    Compare the standard weight to Horse power and torque and specific fuel consumption figures of the smaller capacity Toyota and Nissan quad valve V-8 and V-6's against the equivalent less effective 2 valve per cylinder stuck in a fifties time warp American designed and built cast iron heavy weights !
    What price a choice indeed ?
  • BradnPA, on 11/09/2007, -2/+1why not spend the time and money on another source of energy already.. who the fuk gives a ***** about this retarded crap. now isnt the time to come out with these toys for the damn rich.
  • dafragsta, on 11/11/2007, -6/+3Front page with 21 diggs. Weird. Been seeing this a lot lately.
  • heystoopid, on 11/08/2007, -5/+1Imagine how powerful a beast it would be if the engine had a far superior four or six valves per cylinder with quad overhead cam Variable Valve Timing technology as originally suggested by the Italians , you would be looking a least a minimum of 1100 Asian ponies under the bonnet all without resorting to superchargers or exhaust driven turbo chargers !
    The beast would be literally flying down the road with all those ponies !
  • DanOnTheMoon, on 11/08/2007, -7/+2Dugg because it's not Ford.
  • inactive, on 11/09/2007, -8/+2It looks nice . . . but for close to 100,000 probably not worth it. The numbers are nice . . . but the SRT8 Charger had awesome specs but sucks balls:
    Top speed : 130 mph(electronically limited)
    0-60 mph : 5.0 sec.
    0-¼ mile : 13.5 sec @ 106.3 mph
    60-0 braking distance : 120 ft
    200 ft skidpad : 0.87 g
    Same Price Range you can get Lance Evolution:
    Horsepower : 286 hp @ 6500 rpm
    Torque : 289 lb-ft @ 3500 rpm
    Redline : 7000 rpm
    Top speed : 156 mph(electronically limited)
    0-60 mph : 4.4 sec.
    0-¼ mile : 12.9 sec @ 106.2 mph
    60-0 braking distance : 110 ft
    200 ft skidpad : 0.98 g
  • inactive, on 11/09/2007, -10/+1Dont get me started on the dodge viper conspiracy! they never even made the viper. every model has just been photoshopped or made with some 3d graphics sh*t. Vote for ron paul, he will stop this doodoo and bring back ... something.... the constipation or something like that! WOOOOOO dugg diggity dugg
  • greenamp, on 11/09/2007, -15/+2And it will still be beaten by modded out Evos, Srt4s, and STIs. All for half the price.

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.