digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Sons of fat mothers 'could be less fertile'

dailymail.co.uk — Overweight women may have sons who are less fertile, doctors have warned. Research shows men born to such mothers may have sperm of poorer quality.

Who dugg this? Made popular Aug 28, 2007

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

78 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • hydroplane, on 10/10/2007, -5/+36YO MAMA is so fat that you have slightly lower concentrations of sperm as well as fewer mobile sperm than guys born to mothers of a lower body mass index.
  • MikeonTV, on 10/10/2007, -12/+37Sounds like evolution to me
  • holycrapitsed, on 10/10/2007, -4/+22new insult: you son of a fat bitch.
  • sarazen, on 10/10/2007, -2/+20FTA - "However, the differences were so small that the researchers could not be sure they were not down to chance."

    I am all for trying to encourage everyone to take care of themselves and keep to a reasonable weight, but you have to wonder why do they even bother to report this crap?
  • RuffRidr, on 10/10/2007, -4/+19There's a 'Yo mama so fat... joke in there somewhere, but I'm too lazy to find it.
  • Salgat, on 10/10/2007, -2/+7As much as people may digg you down, it is true. The weak are weeded out(which will be less true as medicine advances).
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6my mom is fat, my dad is fat and I'm fat too. I guess that's why I have no kids...or a girlfriend..or a wife..or friends
  • browwiw, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Sounds like a self-correcting problem, really. Much like backyard wrestling.
  • restlessdesign, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Enjoy your AIDS.
  • Hayaemsay, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4no dey didnt but the did neway gud pix make gud articlz

    /dum-spk
  • pataylor1965, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3They have lower brain cell counts.
  • IllBeBack, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5I for one welcome our new fat overlords.
  • CptCheerios, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5Thats just another point for Darwin.
  • IllBeBack, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3God Hates Fats
  • Ngai, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3it was either that or your moms picture...
  • proficient, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5So that's pretty much most of America.
  • smackhero, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2don't talk about things you clearly don't understand.
  • sullyz0r, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3I can't see that really making sense from an evolutionary perspective.
  • smackhero, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3or maybe you're just a sterile moron.
  • mal1964, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Any story with "could" in it is a non-story in my book.
  • MatttK, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3There are exceptions and outliers to every rule and study.
  • ICSU, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2In terms of volume, it is.
  • GreyICE, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Because statistically insignificant numbers are fun for the entire family! Remember, when the average sperm count is like 3% less plus or minus 5% you have good data!
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2roll a phattie --- ROLL A FATTY!!!

    owww yeah push it, baby!!!
  • hoowahman, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2More cushin for the pushin? Whos with me?
  • Lister169, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1It's a verse from "Comfort Eagle" by Cake.
  • Jobe479, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Good
  • SpyDerMann, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I'm sorry but that's an oxymoron.
  • s33k4, on 10/10/2007, -4/+5What about an anorexic mother?
  • Ramble, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Over here in the UK the Daily Mail (or Daily Hate) is a joke paper read by morons. They're a bunch of freaking Nazis (I'm not joking either, they supported Hitler during the war).
  • LordSlashstab55, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3and they do it to their selves
  • ChrisrWilliams, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2and smaller penises
  • Myonosken, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1They do, and that's what really hurts.
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Species evolve when unfit animals die and the genes are no longer passed along, when a species is unfit the offspring don't magically become infertile.
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1No, because you take into account the pregnancy.
  • Okari, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2No thank you. I like my Mountain Dew.
  • ezkiel, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1mixed with another i picked up recently: you're just fat bitch crotch fruit
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Only if their baby is 100% pure fat.
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2I didn't know America was mostly fat women. I guess you learn something new every day.
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Sounds good.
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1You may be fat, but you're smart. Try buying a wife. They don't get a choice! Not because you're buying them, because they're women.
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1The oedipal connotations are disturbing.
  • Rcdriver, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I don't...
  • Memnochxx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1That's because it doesn't.
  • ICSU, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2...people should know what anecdotal evidence is.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1What the ***** is this *****?
  • crazywarthog, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Fat people eat more than their fair share. They cause more than their fair share of global warming and we all have to pay more for health care. We should tax them to extinction. Finally, they are disgusting to look at to i.e. eye pollution.
  • inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Fat bottomed girls you make my sperm cell count go down
  • zonk3r, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Buried as innaccurate: Fat people breed like flies.
  • oxsnard, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0correlation is not the same as causality.
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 78 of 78 discussions

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.