What is Digg?Sponsored by Paramount Pictures
Paranormal Activity To Have Longest Movie Credits Ever? view!
dvd.ign.com - Paramount is thanking fans for their help on the PA campaign & adding their names to the DVD credits
469 Comments
- sjbdallas, on 07/12/2009, -3/+527I think i've discovered a new pickup line.
- Kronich, on 07/12/2009, -9/+452Who says the brits are prudes???
- novenator, on 07/12/2009, -4/+366now THATS my kind of health care!
- larsvilhelmsen, on 07/13/2009, -15/+348So... Why the exclamation mark? At school I was taught how to roll on concoms at age 13, that masturbation was a natural thing and that porn is not reality. But then again, that was in Denmark, where facts and science weigh more in the classroom, than imaginary beings and moral minorities.
- flagg85, on 07/12/2009, -9/+270FTA - an orgasm a day keeps the doctor away, LOL.
- Vapor17, on 07/13/2009, -14/+234I thought National Honors Society...
- GeorgeWKush, on 07/12/2009, -3/+219The Swedes.
- Briggykins, on 07/13/2009, -2/+209'The advice, which also claims regular sex is good for cardiovascular health, has been circulated to parents, teachers and youth workers.'
So...not pupils then, Daily Mail? - synapticcleft, on 07/13/2009, -3/+199Won't this advice increase the risk of stroke?
- CaptainPanda, on 07/13/2009, -2/+174Hey, baby. An orgasm a day keeps that doctor away. *wink wink*
- snarkastic, on 07/13/2009, -5/+120Oh for *****'s sake. This is more Daily Mail propaganda, and doesn't deserve comment. They hate the idea of sex education. In fact they hate the idea of sex, except insofar as it helps them to sell their tawdry snot-rag.
- smartnerd666, on 07/13/2009, -5/+114Because you're lying. Nobody on digg has a girlfriend, let alone a Swedish one.
- Kingj3144, on 07/13/2009, -0/+109I remember in my heath class one of the planed parenthood or family planning services can in to teach about condoms but was not allowed to distribute them on school grounds so any transactions had to take place across the street. My school made sex education feel like a drug deal
- donjacko, on 07/12/2009, -6/+109sound advice if you ask me
nice to see some one actually teaching teens the benefits of sex rather than all the negatives - steelersfan7roe, on 07/13/2009, -6/+107The family group protesting these leaflets.
Apparently their conservatism and moralizing are more important than the health of youngsters. - Wakkyweed, on 07/13/2009, -5/+105Well, it might increase the risk of stroking off.
- gnews, on 07/12/2009, -8/+105"reduce the risk of heart attacks and stroke"... This will raise a generation of jerkoffs!
We grew up 'knowing' that masturbation causes blindness! - Kronich, on 07/12/2009, -20/+111FTA "The leaflet has come to light just a week after it emerged that a £6million initiative to reduce teenage pregnancies more than doubled the number of girls conceiving." With an approach like this it's not really surprising..
- RudeTurnip, on 07/13/2009, -1/+89They're already a bunch of jerkoffs.
- Jook, on 07/12/2009, -1/+80No, at a later age....this simple prepares the heart for stress.
//whacks it 5 times a day, will live to be 200 - larsvilhelmsen, on 07/13/2009, -0/+76Erm, I only speak of how it is and was 20 years ago in my own country and not about the specific ignorance of americans or anyone else. I do poke at religion, but America is not the only religion-encumbered nation in the world and might even educate their youth on sex and sexuality. I do not comment on that - but on the fact that whenever voices are raised against sexual enlightenment based on science and research, it is always moral or religious groups trying to impose their morals on everyone else based on their personal superstitions.
I am for enlightenment and verifiable knowledge and against bias and superstitions. I am not against America(ns) - why should I be? - euando, on 07/13/2009, -0/+69The Daily Mail cares not a jot for accuracy. I really am baffled by the number of Daily Mail stories on Digg recently.
There appears to be no claim that this leaflet has been given to children. The repeated claim that it is encouraging under-age sex seems to be based on the conservative stand point that any knowledge of sex (and certainly any suggestion that it isn't evil) automatically leads to having sex.
There is also the underhand assertion that sex education efforts increased the level of under-age pregnancy in those who took part when the evidence given does not suggest that at all; the girls taking part in this scheme were deemed to be at "higher risk" of teen pregnancy than other girls. This was why the scheme targeted them. Unsurprisingly, telling teenagers not to have sex didn't totally work. For this to be in any way a relevant statistic we would need to know predicted levels of teen pregnancy among these girls before they participated. This, unsurprisingly is not given as that might get in the way of the Daily Mail's anti-everything-that's-changed-since-1945 agenda. All we have here is evidence that girls from disadvantaged backgrounds are more likely to fall pregnant than those who are not.
I look forward to the follow-up story about how these girls did it deliberately to sponge off the state benefit system...
Can we please ignore this reactionary, sensationalist rag? - EtherGnat, on 07/13/2009, -1/+70It beats the hell out of an apple.
- Rudegar, on 07/13/2009, -1/+64just use safety goggles
- PowderedToasty, on 07/13/2009, -1/+64what? Where did he even mention Americans?
- safetysealed, on 07/13/2009, -3/+65A - This is the new approach.
B - Free condoms were the old approach.
Sex education was a ***** joke when I did it 10 years ago, theres no reason to think that it changed since then.
Showing crappy cartoons of a woman's "intimate parts" when most 13 year olds have access to the internet and a massive plethora of porn is just retarded. - DURD3N, on 07/13/2009, -1/+62I guess she'll still be seeing the doctor then.
- yillip, on 07/12/2009, -11/+69So what is wrong with nationalized healthcare??? Seems to me they have their priorities straight.
- skidork, on 07/13/2009, -3/+59I've been considering masturbation my entire life!
- Synchro, on 07/13/2009, -3/+58Why does this sound a lot like sections of "Brave New World"??
- Suricou, on 07/13/2009, -1/+55Not that far off. The sexuality of the BNW society was based on the idea that if all the consequences of sex could be removed by technology, then the taboo would fall and promiscuity could become a way to strengthen friendships and promote social stability.
- Ninh, on 07/13/2009, -9/+626 million quid spent on freely distributed condoms would have had a better effect.
- Kronich, on 07/12/2009, -3/+56lol - sniff sniff - "I don't want to go blind"" - fap fap fap - sniff sniff
- Suricou, on 07/13/2009, -4/+56Ah, the Daily Mail. It knows that a moral outrage sells papers - if no outrage exists, then one must be invented.
- sleepysteve, on 07/13/2009, -1/+52brb, extending my life
- awhiteflame, on 07/13/2009, -2/+51Wankers!
- Ninh, on 07/13/2009, -2/+47I was always willing to risk an eye.
- Boagrius, on 07/13/2009, -4/+49Well, looks like I'm the healthiest person alive!
- Peach3s, on 07/13/2009, -4/+49Well it's safe to say as a digger that i am well prepared.
- Mujokan, on 07/13/2009, -0/+44Yep, it is specifically aimed at professionals and parents. It gives ideas for how to talk about the pleasure aspect of sex in a sex-ed situation.
It's the National Health Service in the sense that it is produced by a small regional HIV and sexual health center that comes under the NHS umbrella.
Typical Daily Mail beat-up.
More details (pdf of a magazine article): http://www.sexualhealthsheffield.nhs.uk/publicatio ... - dj_sea2005, on 07/13/2009, -0/+44I touched an Estonian girl once, does that count?
- clarient, on 07/13/2009, -6/+50If we could stop considering our bodies and sexuality as a cultural taboo, and teach responsibility in all aspects of life to our children, we could start making progress.
The problem with teen sex is not that they're having sex. The problem is that they are spoiled, self-centered little bundles of sulk that have rarely been held accountable for anything in their life. Why would sex be any different? - kaniz, on 07/13/2009, -0/+38You know, sex is surprisingly a pretty poor cardio workout. Which I find odd considering how much of a sweat you work up if you're doing it right.
Although, they really should be promoting masturbation instead of sex, especially to younger girls. Once people learn their bodies, realize what they can provide for themselves, and what pleases them - they are better able to do it without feeling pressure from another kid to get the same enjoyment.
For someone who doesn't know their own body, what emotions they feel and what sensations they can have - the first time you start fooling around can be very overwhelming, and very easy to simply 'give in' to the moment leading to more risky and promsicious behavior. If teens know what these things feel like / how to get there themselfs, then they will be less likely to give it up to the first boy who makes them feel that way.
Teach kids to know and respect their bodies first. - DirtyVicar, on 07/13/2009, -0/+38you start gravitating toward websites like Digg.
- AaronPDX, on 07/13/2009, -2/+39Way ahead of you there, Britain.
- NJank, on 07/13/2009, -2/+38That quick shag has been anecdotally compared to a 5 mile hike on more than one occasion.
Hey, how about killing two birds with one stone? P.E. class could get WAY more interesting. - zigardne, on 07/13/2009, -0/+35With lube and willpower.
- apr400, on 07/13/2009, -1/+35go for it
Even better if you bring your sister along to wave her proud Australian baps about - serif69, on 07/13/2009, -3/+35http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/8894/kaneklapqo ...
- moxley, on 07/13/2009, -4/+36I think this is positive.
I am really surprised and sure that the ultra right wing douches are going to complain, but masturbation is healthy for kids - in the US we had a surgeon general once who came out and said so (Dr. Jocelyn Elders) and lost her position because of it - and that was in the Clinton years.
It's disgusting when the state tries to legislate or otherwise impose it's ***** subjective views on morality and sexual health - and when they start trying to deal with teen pregnancy and STDs people die and suffer - because they are more interested in the fear based political fallout from telling the truth than they are about protecting people's health. Abstinence based sex education is a perfect example - they'd rather have kids be ignorant about sex and drugs than to tell the truth - they prefer kids getting pregnant or getting HIV or overdosing rather than admitting that sex and drugs are part of life and here is the right way to protect yourself if you're going to do it...
And now that these abstinence programs have been full swing in many areas in the US, guess what? The teen pregnancies and STD transmission rates have gone way, way up in those areas.....big surprise. -
Show 51 - 100 of 478 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 