What is Digg?Sponsored by newegg
Missed out on the best electronic deals last Black Friday? view!
newegg.com - Newegg.com's Cyber Monday Promotion has you covered. No Lines, No Crowds; Just Click and Save.
62 Comments
- qiaohua, on 11/11/2009, -10/+73"Nutt Sacking" LOL
- spworm, on 11/12/2009, -3/+41I know, why is it that people keep ramming it down my throat.
- stevenwalters, on 11/12/2009, -1/+30If THC is 3rd, then air and cotton could also be considered 3rd, as could butterflies and kittens.
- l3lazec, on 11/12/2009, -8/+37Ugh, can we stop with the Nutt Sacking puns already? They've used that joke like five times
- net403, on 11/12/2009, -1/+27Agreed this stupid joke helps tarnish the legitimacy of the article
- Elohir, on 11/12/2009, -1/+22We don't need no stinkin "science" or "facts" to base your laws on! You do what we tell you to do while we get rich from your toil, what about this arrangement do you not understand?
Viva la démocratie! - NuclearBlast, on 11/12/2009, -5/+25The nutt sacking joke wasn't funny the first time. Now it just serves to derail the comments and really tarnishes the importance of what happened. Pretty lame.
- jayb1rd, on 11/12/2009, -0/+17Can you come up with one person who has died as a result of an overdose of THC?
No?
Then I guess you need to check your "medical research." - perrym, on 11/12/2009, -4/+18Idiocracy is already here.
forget the implications of this guy being sacked and other advisors leaving because of this.
forget the government having more say over drug policy than actual people who know what they are talking about.
Nutt[sic] sack can also refer to the scrotum!!!!111
LOLZ!!!!11
oww my balls!
(or should that be nutts?) - Opiate, on 11/12/2009, -0/+12Glad to see some scientists not caving to political agendas and standing for the truth. We could use a lot more of them.
- jayb1rd, on 11/12/2009, -1/+10There is no way I can take this article seriously at all when it says "Nutt Sacking." I am too distracted to actually read what is going on.
- jzh1554, on 11/12/2009, -2/+11Along with giggles and rainbows.
- KevinRowz, on 11/12/2009, -8/+17I heard after he got sacked they busted him.
- Anub1s, on 11/12/2009, -1/+10Dugg the article ONLY because of Nutt Sacking in the title.
- waydee, on 11/12/2009, -0/+8Go back to youtube.
- Chronometron94, on 11/12/2009, -9/+17yeah the "Nutt Sacking" titles are getting pretty annoying
- bitbytebit, on 11/12/2009, -0/+8I can look past the poor jokes to the actual article, but I wish I didn't have to.
Its amazing how many presumable adults get on the internet and become juvenile *****.
Although maybe the majority here are actually teenagers, who can tell nowadays. - opticwind, on 11/12/2009, -2/+8Really, I'd probably put cocaine/crack on the number one spot.
- nullmind, on 11/12/2009, -0/+6Buried for title bait.
- Sanfranon5, on 11/12/2009, -0/+5http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-iBJQFMvgo
- absurdist, on 11/12/2009, -0/+5Then we'll just get something like "Nutt Discharge Concerns Scientific Panel..."
- rolf, on 11/12/2009, -0/+5What's ironic about that?
- cyrix, on 11/12/2009, -5/+10I wonder what the tea baggers reaction is to nutt sacking.......
- 1hrSleep, on 11/12/2009, -0/+5Dude, I smoked butterflies and snorted kittens last week and I think I'm dying now.
- Jerryrad, on 11/12/2009, -8/+13C'mon guys get off the Nutt sack.
- obsessedglobe, on 11/12/2009, -0/+4Right. But you're missing the bigger picture here. While the scrotal references are funny, the guy lost his job because he had opinions about drugs that were backed by research. Instead of discussion, he was fired and replaced.
- muzzy, on 11/12/2009, -1/+5How about the article submitters stop using the term "sacked". Come on, it's pretty obvious that the Telegraph and Digg Submitter know that people are going to snicker...
What about "fired", "let go", "discharged", etc.
There are plenty of other terms to use if the writer didn't want to try and be humorous. - Libertaire, on 11/12/2009, -1/+5Man, what a bunch of 13 year old on this thread. Grow up for *****'s sake.
- Hcoug, on 11/12/2009, -5/+9poor nutt, always getting busted
- Paranor01, on 11/12/2009, -0/+3troll needs to smoke some weed to get a dose of reality
- Hood15, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2That'll teach him to research, he should talk based on guesses instead like the people that fired him.
- Nhoji, on 11/12/2009, -6/+8How much Nutt could a Nutt sack sack if a Nutt sack could sack Nutts.
- waxoff, on 11/12/2009, -2/+4You forgot the <butthead voice> tags...
- satirenine, on 11/13/2009, -0/+2Maybe you need to grow down!
Just kidding, I don't care where you grow. Legalize it! - piratefish, on 11/12/2009, -1/+3he should move to california.
- snogye, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2He should back up his gut with truthiness.
- Hood15, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Along 280 other people so far.
- satirenine, on 11/13/2009, -0/+1I bet the teabaggers in the US would approve of this sacking.
- alexllanio, on 11/13/2009, -0/+1Legalize please... its the change we really needed. Please... ::sobs:: Hahahaha i had fun writing that one, but no, on the serious level, its time to legalize what is rightfully ours.
- darkz77, on 11/12/2009, -1/+2big ole smiles i would assume
- alexrawdin, on 11/12/2009, -2/+3again? really?
- TrouserNinja, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Slightly more relevant to the content of the article is that it had 420 diggs when I found it.
- snogye, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1I would have sacked Bagger, too.
- Bob24, on 11/12/2009, -1/+2...*****...off.
- casualdave, on 11/13/2009, -0/+1I take it that the Telegraph's target audience is Beavis and Butthead.
- erkokite, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1It never gets old, does it? :D
- Jaiotu, on 11/12/2009, -2/+2No.
- TeCuervo, on 11/12/2009, -1/+1I couldn't help laughing for a bit because of the title.
But seriously, I actually appreciate what he did and believe he should not be humiliated in any way shape or form.
I would seriously consider voting for a person like this if they ever decided to run for any elected position. - WhistlinTom, on 11/12/2009, -1/+1You're a youtube. OHHHHHHHH!!!!!
-
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is