30 Comments
- thscientist1, on 11/25/2008, -1/+14I dont think thats a risk anyone would like to take...
- Jonmacd, on 11/25/2008, -1/+11Bags of sand.
- MeatPlow, on 11/25/2008, -6/+15Boobies.
- BoneheadFarker, on 11/25/2008, -2/+9Fun bags.
- inactive, on 11/25/2008, -0/+6Lady humps.
- DpNo1, on 11/25/2008, -2/+8Knockers.
- pauliusuza, on 11/25/2008, -0/+6Pillows
- norman619, on 11/25/2008, -0/+5Headlights
- digitronix, on 11/25/2008, -2/+7Titties.
- soloman747, on 11/25/2008, -0/+5Sweater Bunnies
- cyrusuncc, on 11/25/2008, -0/+3Hooters
- rameznabel, on 11/25/2008, -0/+3jongaza
- Thyris, on 11/25/2008, -0/+3placebo effect works both ways, for good and for harm.
- shagmin, on 11/25/2008, -0/+2That's no moon.
- SSPink, on 11/25/2008, -1/+3Yes.
But who would be stupid enough to gamble for their life against very long odds odds? - norman619, on 11/25/2008, -1/+3No *****. There are always exceptions in cancer but they are NOT the norm. It's like pinning your survival on whether or not you win the lottery. Sure it CAN happen but the odds of it actually happening to YOU are so remote that you might as well rule it out as a real possibility.
- nunu4u, on 11/25/2008, -1/+2In addition, there is a possibility of continual radiation adding to the risk of tumors.
- Metasquares, on 11/25/2008, -0/+1They do tend to pick up a lot of carinomas in situ, which may not necessarily become invasive. They would be still be treated, as it's difficult to estimate which will and which will not. Unnecessary surgery? Perhaps. But better than people dying because their tumors were assumed innocuous.
- inactive, on 11/26/2008, -0/+1Right...we need more intensive research on this.
- silent7seven, on 11/25/2008, -1/+2The cancer's headed for that small moon.
- tsproule, on 12/21/2008, -0/+1The ability of the body to fight cancer is a real thing. A legitimate point of debate is whether chemo and radiation not only make the patient feel horrible, but MIGHT be destroying cells which would have killed the cancer if left to it. I think we should eventually steer toward treatments which enhance the body's natural defenses, rather than the brutish 'nuke and pave' approach.
- shahadin, on 11/26/2008, -0/+1Inflammatory breast cancer is a specific type of breast cancer that involves the skin of the breast. It occurs when breast cancer cells form "nests" and block the lymphatic drainage from the skin of the breast. Symptoms include redness, tenderness, and warmth. Thickening of the skin of the breast (an orange-peel appearance), rapid breast enlargement, and ridging of the skin of the breast may also be present. Some women may also develop a lump in the breast.
http://cancer-breast-symptoms.blogspot.com/ - dizavin, on 11/25/2008, -0/+1yeah... that's a gamble I wouldn't recommend any women to even think about. who's the freaking bonehead that suggested this as a viable method of treatment?
"ignore it, and there's still a chance it'll go away!" - mikinurbook, on 11/25/2008, -0/+1I think a positive outlook on life definitely improves health, who knows, maybe in some cases the woman were able to stay healthier by not knowing, as opposed to living every day wondering if it could be one of their last.
...not to mention the possibility of all the radiation hindering the situation.
Interesting. - Truson, on 11/25/2008, -1/+1Very interesting, we need more research. Don't forget the green tea and organic soy nuts for prevention.
- KyjL, on 11/26/2008, -1/+1"Some day, Breast Cancer will be a thing of the past"
*snicker* - replaysMike, on 11/25/2008, -4/+3Let me feel it - I have a knack for being able to tell.
- unknownsoldierX, on 11/25/2008, -2/+1Steves
- tonezone90, on 11/25/2008, -4/+1Dugg for boobies.
- inactive, on 11/25/2008, -7/+2It's ***** cancer.
Buried.



What is Digg?