7 Comments
- randersontt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3For health workers and the elderly and the sick, - fine. But is it really advisable for EVERYONE to get this - or is this just another example of fearmongering employed to push more product?
- geekchic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1A medical firm would make vastly more money from treating you after you catch a bad flu, so prevention is cheaper for society.
Why do people always try to find "evil" where there is actually just plain old common sense. - Khook20, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Did you know in order to have this vaccine out in time for flu season doctors/researchers have to GUESS what strain of flu will dominate the next upcoming season? Let's just say some years they are luckier than others.
- Ebacherville, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Sorry I will not take your shot.. I'll not be implanted with a small amount of a virus when there is a chance that I wont ever get the virus in the first place.
- nepawoods, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Experiments have demonstrated that to contract flu, you have to vigorously rub the virus into epithelial tissue, such as your eyes or more likely inside your nose. Merely inhaling the virus doesn't do it. Keep your hands clean, and be gentle with them when they're in your nose, and you won't get it.
- BarbaraKolbe, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Truly needed for many elderly like my father.
- Diigger, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Inoculated by the Millions, most research show that there are no benefits. But false claims continue as they have for many years. Might as well get a shot of vitamins. These claims are most certainly being pushed by big pharmaceuticals who lobby. http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=587 learn and voice.
.
What is Digg?
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official