Sponsored by Amazon.com
Kindle(TM) - Amazon's #1 most gifted product view!
amazon.com - Order Kindle now and receive it in time for Christmas. Free Expedited shipping. Click to learn more.
5 Comments
- CraigB12, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2This really sucks because this could be insanely useful had they disclosed the information of the HDD brands and models. They give an unbeleivable amount of information out in this, but it really doesn't serve any purpose becuase we don' tknow what brands they're talking about.
- Sonic_Molson, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1This is perhaps the most interesting and useful article I've read on digg in the past few weeks, months even.
- jdavid, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1because if they did, that might really affect how much they pay for hard drives.
- brettnetworks, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I am really surprised that in the study lower operational temps caused more failure than the higher temps. From what I gathered a drive running at 60 degrees F is worse of than a drive running around 80 degrees F.
- netburnr, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say the brand that fails most is Western Digital...


What is Digg?