7 Comments
- thenativeraver, on 11/20/2007, -1/+2Since it takes more energy to create the effect than the energy that it produces it's not really a fuel, is it?
- madwaxer, on 05/09/2008, -0/+1naturally they wouldn't be using a pool sized body of water sight away in case it ignites too fast and toasts them.
which is why they have to run more experiments. - phoenixm4, on 12/24/2007, -1/+0This is a cool discovery.
- frozenx, on 12/26/2007, -1/+0ver... very... important alternative energy.
- HighCountry1, on 12/06/2007, -1/+0Plastic was discovered by mistake... This could be huge with enough research. Maybe not for fuels but for numerous medical and practical purposes.
DUGG for awesomeness! - STUPID123, on 11/21/2007, -1/+0i read article, interesting, but the coments, how many discoveries are made accident and by things right in front of us, about the energy, think about the biodesiel everybody is clamoring for, talk about a waste.
- Timberlakefan, on 12/09/2007, -1/+0Cool discovery. It can be useful but only if you did it twice at the same time because it takes a 4165degree flame to melt uranium (U) and this saltwater fire can be 4000degrees hot!


What is Digg?