What is Digg?45 Comments
- femmebot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"For example, they don't know the difference between kind and species."
Sorry but "kind" is not a valid taxonomic category in biology. The article is right: they found a new species. - sabster, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0why didnt they just call it like.. cool purple frog or something lol
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I thik it's cute. Digg.
- RexHavok, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0
- gODfall, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0cool, azereus mascot finally found!
- ihybridora, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0it looks like it has a fish head
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0*think
- ender52, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0frogs are cool +digg
- capn_caveman, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"wow a purple frog time to stop trying to find a cure for cancer and focus on this"
Maybe this frog has a cure for cancer in its genetic code. - reconciledthief, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Do they arbitrarily assign the species age? 175 Million years? Where'd they get such an exact figure...
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Gimme crunchy frogs..
- glitchbit, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0frog*
- SirDreamAlot, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Old news..The ppl at Azereus have already discovered it :d
- Bigbro69, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0>>Posted:
>>October 17, 2003 - msgmsg, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0haha BigBro69 just purchased everyone here
- drbroccoli, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Cool. +Digg
- allarise, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Giant Frogs, Giant Frogs, what can I say...back to you.
- tudacee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I had to look twice to see which end was which!!!
man, that is one ugly frog. - glitchbit, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0maybe they should look a lil closer there is a similar fog here in north america....
- wired4u, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Can you lick the frog?
- curt, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Grape-flavored frogs... better than purple Kool-Aid.
- tarun, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Cool! Reminds me of the illustrations from Alice in Wonderland. Maybe they'll make it the new Azures icon!
- DiMo, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0it could just be a physically disabled frog.
when we see some weird abnormality in a human we don't make a new species just for them... - BugMeNot2, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis
Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis
Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis
Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis
Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis - allthewhile, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0And that is why I believe we will find a now yet undiscovered primate in the woods of northwestern usa. Yes, I'm crazy.
- reversial, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Says a lot... took them 175,000,000 years, just to find a bright purple frog.
- thecoolestcow, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0he's totally grayish blackish. no purple there.
sorry, i'm color blind. - krazykit, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Why don't they get back to looking for a cure for cancer? A scientist is not just a scientist. These are biologists studying these kinds of animals/communities/ecosystems, not biologists specializing in diseases and human ailments.
- Otto, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Agreed, he's not all that purple.
Besides, this isn't the first purple frog ever found, you know. - jayf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0And you thought being green wasn't easy!
- hammerattack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Well, you know, better late than... wtf good is a purple frog?
- YrUrEadNtHiS, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0I SAY THE SCIENTISTS WERE ON DRUGS. WHY DID IT TAKE SO LONG TO DISCOVER THIS FROG WHO IS POINTLESS IN LIFE? UNLESS IT'S LICKABLE. ::::GRABS OSIRISCKY3'S TONGUE TO LICK THE FROG:::: MUST BE TESTED FIRST...
- Osiriscky3, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0dude lets go lick some toad
- capn_caveman, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Tastes like chicken.
- kamizu, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0@coffee33
"Looks like my ex-gf and thats nothing newh eheh"
doesnt really say much about your taste in women, does it?
as for the article itself, it was posted 2 years ago. old news = no digg - BugMeNot2, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Fat Man!
- syuusuke, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0its a fatty
- FarcicalFart, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Ugly..
- oldcyborg, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Flying purple people eaters are just on the horizon, I tell you!!!
BFD!
Cyborg - themajor, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0I'd digg it because its cool, but I'm not going to because the scientists are severely misguided and falsify information in the article. For example, they don't know the difference between kind and species. they found a different kind of frog, but a frog none the less.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Looks like my ex-gf and thats nothing newh eheh
http://www.coffeetornado.com
Coffee - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -4/+0wow a purple frog time to stop trying to find a cure for cancer and focus on this
-------------------------
http://www.frontlinetech.blogspot.com
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is