What is Digg?101 Comments
- Shatterpulse, on 10/10/2007, -10/+96Much more convincing than Bush's speech
- spyd3rweb, on 10/10/2007, -7/+79digg needs a picture section because digg needs a picture section because...
- andrewcsayer, on 10/10/2007, -2/+67Thinking outside the square, are we?
- KevenM, on 10/10/2007, -8/+60If you stare at it long enough...
nothing happens. Don't waste your time like I did. - nicksauce, on 10/10/2007, -25/+71This should be the official emblem Christianity.
- KKKBBS, on 10/10/2007, -2/+39circular reasoning is a kind of art
- tehpwnerofn00bs, on 10/10/2007, -3/+37....because circular reasoning is a kind of art...
- ToadLeg, on 10/10/2007, -4/+36Christianity: God exists because a book says he exists. The book is true because God exists.
Evolution: Things evolve because the evidence says they do. The evidence is true because.... things evolve??? No. The evidence is true because it is found in the world. To deny the truth of evidence is to deny the truth of the world, also known as reality. There is no circular reasoning behind evolution, except in the belief in reality (reality exists because it does). Do you want to deny the existence of reality? - kurdt33, on 10/16/2007, -0/+30Well that was a waste of 2 hours.
- buzzert, on 10/10/2007, -1/+22Somebody needs to make a shirt of this!
- abdeviation, on 10/10/2007, -2/+19who else's eyeballs went around in circles 20 times?
- TheTaoOfBill, on 10/10/2007, -0/+17Don't do that. It's bad enough we got retards saying "will it blend" every chance they get. We don't need to be dealing with idiots going to all the upcoming topics and saying "First" in order to achieve some sense of importance.
- Zarokima, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15The only logical reason for the existence of God is that human beings needed something to explain what could not be explained and pulled the "a supernatural being did it" excuse, then refused to accept scientific truth when things explained by God could actually be explained well. He's just a bad idea that got worse since he's no longer needed. God did not create man, it was man who created God.
- RandomGuySteve, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9What's there to comment? It's a mildly clever image. And we all know how far you get in life by being mildly clever.
- nicksauce, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9"Does Christianity say that the Bible is true because...it is?"
I have heard this argument more times than I can count. - Joshuarr, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8No.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8i read very fast but still havent got to the end..
- khedoros, on 07/31/2009, -1/+8Only an idiot tries to explain religion using logic. I have irrational belief in a big, invisible man/woman/thing in the sky. There's no explaining that using logic.
- maiku00, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6well, you can't argue with that.
- JQP123, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Circular Reasoning: I know it (the Bible) is true because the Bible tells me so.
- strax, on 10/16/2007, -1/+7counter argument:
circular reasoning doesn't work because... - lowerlogic, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6some people are slow readers.
- vornan19, on 10/10/2007, -0/+5Until Caturday!
- alwaysnomadic, on 11/18/2008, -0/+5Sounds reasonable, in a round-a-bout kind of way.
- khedoros, on 07/31/2009, -0/+5*whoosh* Right over the head...
- chsbrgr, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6It works because the image says so.
- Bilabrin, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Reminds me of a religous discussion I once had.
Me: How do you know God exists?
Them: Because the bible says so!
Me: How do you know the bible is correct?
Them: Because it was written by God! - shadomynd, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4For the last time, micro and macro evolution are the same ***** thing.
- TheWhiteOtter, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4Evolution is a theory becuase EVERYTHING in science is a theory; Newton had a THEORY about gravity (and Einstein about Relativity) not proof as we cannot porve anything in science, instead we come up with theories that explain what we see. In fact if you think about it you cannot even prove the that another person is real; you may be insane and are imagining them. Saying something isn't true just becuase its a theory shows just how little you know about scientific method.
As to your link I hardly think that a site that proclaims "Jesus will return" can talk objectively about the theory that disputes christianity's founding story. - j0eb0nd7, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4You are trying to use circular reasoning to refute circular reasoning. Your counter argument is further proof that circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works because...
- severfire, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5i cant find escape... ahh!! ;-)
- fusama, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3macro evolution was invented so that the anti-evolution crowd could come up with a type of evolution that couldn't be easily proven to exist in a lab, due to the absurd timescale required. It's like saying there's micro prime numbers and macro prime numbers with macro prime numbers having over 1000000 digits, then asserting that macro prime numbers don't exist because noone has found one yet.
- thegreathal, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Yeah, but will it blend?
- thedoubler, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2... The best rhetorical question I've heard in a while.
- hmmdar, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3The only reality that exist is my own, and you can never prove otherwise.
- schleppo, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3Yes, it's very convenient to apply a simple epithet to describe an entire group of people. French are stinky, whites can't dance, women can't drive, etc. Please continue to enlighten us, oh wise one.
- inactive, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Brawndo is what plants crave because it's got electroytes. Plants need Brawndo because electrolytes is what they crave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WsxbPNbTBxA - arbulus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2I agree.
You should never pass up a chance to say "IT'S A TRAP" where it would fit. - fusama, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2Most people want a picture section so that the picture "stories" can be filtered out of the news section. And, I for one do find the video section convenient.
- i6koi, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4ive always found it interesting people want a picture section
i mean, we have a videos section, and we all know how well used that is - arbulus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I'm all for it.
It's a new meme because it's a new meme... - dawgma, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Here is an EPS file (vector) that you can give to a Printer to make your own shirt for $20
http://www.gigasize.com/direct.php/mHiinJaKn6yagKOhk4ah/reasoning.eps - grapfx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Adult, "BECAUSE THAT'S WHY, GO ASK YOUR MOTHER!"
- arbulus, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Just keep reading:
Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works...etc - ojk007, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Seconded.
- xBDVx, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Actually, I'd like a screensaver of this. Preferably where the circle rotates and (maybe) bounces around the screen....yeah, that'd be great.
- ApokalypseNow, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Inaccurate - the fossil record works due to the layering of geological strata.
- max420, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Haha, I don't even look at the upcoming section very often. I just thought it was funny that there as 70 diggs but nocomments yet.
- drakenlot, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1So you think... this is the internet, memes do not die, they simply slow down in use.
CATS is still spotted quite a few times - TheRealToma, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1How about a sub-section that has nothing but pics?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 101 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 