What is Digg?9 Comments
- madformadness, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2 Could this be used to predict cancer in people who have not had cancer?
- djgump35, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1thats like finding out you cought something, taking your vaccine in your special anatomy, then finding out hey the infection is back, the vaccine didn't work. I admit I would like to know, but it would still ruin my day like pouring peroxide on my cuts. It'll burn but with good intentions
- tahim, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1where is your data?
- tahim, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1FDA approval is only one thing... insurance companies obviously do as they please, but will have a tough time doing as you suggest until the test becomes "standard of care" as supported by consensus statements by international societies of oncologists and urologists.
- RyeBrye, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I bet insurance companies will be all over this... and will try to find a way to drop people who come up as having a likelihood of getting cancer again...
- gab00n, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Take Laetrile in decent doses and you won't have a problem. Eat the seeds of fruit like apples and apricots and millet is also a good source of vitamin B17.
- jabbar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0This doesn't really tell how they are going to detect the recurrence. Is it by the presence of a protein? Is it simply by measuring the size of the remaining prostate? What if there is no prostate because of removal? Also, what if the cancer has already spread? Too many questions, almost no information. Sounds suspect to me.
- Smeed, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0That sounds like a good idea^
- sogracefully, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0i'm thinking no, because the article says they're using it on patients who have had the prostate removed.
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is