digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About
See the original image at dailymail.co.uk

Mystery of the 'couple' buried arm in arm 1,000 years ago

dailymail.co.uk — Archaeologists have unearthed the mysterious remains of what first appears to be a couple buried together arm in arm more than 1,000 years ago.

Who dugg this? Made popular Sep 8, 2008

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

61 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -2/+24...they were both female.

    ..gigity.
  • thegrantman, on 09/08/2008, -1/+201,000 years of cuddling.......the horror.
  • threefiveo125go, on 09/08/2008, -0/+12re-bury?

    http://huggingskeletons.ytmnd.com/

  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -2/+10It's actually two men.
  • whxre, on 09/08/2008, -0/+5Dugg for "salad-growing complex"
  • Jegzzy, on 09/08/2008, -0/+5So ***** what, I didn't see it. Get with the project!
  • WilliamAdama, on 09/08/2008, -0/+4In case you didn't know, not everyone reads digg 24/7 like you do so forgive me for digging an article that appeared months ago while i was sleeping, at work, eating dinner, or doing something some else with my life away from here.
  • Matsky, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3How come all these archeology articles on digg lately seem to be so short and seem to jump to conclusions without much explanation or mentioning other possibilities (such as the recent Stonehenge wall article)? I'm not saying this couldn't be true, but what about something like father and son, or perhaps that they were buried roughly and the bodies fell that way? I don't know, they seem a bit lacking.
  • CATSCEO2, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3Mang?

    MBM long lost brother?
  • dn11, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3I'm sorry you just stepped out of a 1950s TV sitcom and you seem very disoriented. Welcome to the future, enjoy your stay.
  • PullingTeeth, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3When you're a cannibal, every fight is a food fight.
  • k3rfuffl3, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3That's so gayist.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+3Can't they ***** leave them alone? I mean...
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2Their pelvises say otherwise.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -2/+4From my medical experience, the one on the left appears to be FEMALE. As someone else stated, look at the hips. Sorry for all you rainbow flag carrying liberals.

    I think I just pissed off 3/4 of Digg. I'm prepared to be buried.
  • Meursault, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2I hope we can clone these two and bring back the Saxon warrior!
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+21000 years into the future, you're welcomed to visit my tomb. I'll do the most mysterious pose for you.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2Last updated at 11:58 PM on 07th September 2008 - Try 11 hours ago. Same skeletons, different article with more OPINIONATED detail.
  • MalarkeyPN, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2... not that there's anything wrong with that.
  • nicko68, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2No, I believe it's saying that they were not a couple as people had assumed after all.
  • charm803, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2I think you missed his point.

    He is pointing out the MrBabyMan diggs.
  • themastersb, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2Having all the same avatar confuses me.
  • bstew22, on 09/08/2008, -1/+3OLDER THAN THE INTERNET....

    ...no seriously think about it.
  • AriaStar, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2Great, ruin the romance for us. :)
  • FeartheKnighted, on 09/08/2008, -0/+2Artifact
  • estacado, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1"Arm in arm" reminds me of that Total Recall mutant that fold an arm into itself.
  • oogee, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Looks more like one of them was thrown on top of the other.
  • nick111, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Gee, I hope they liked each other.
  • akchrs, on 09/08/2008, -1/+2The guy on the left looks like he's doing the shocker with his hand.
  • identifiedlogo, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1I just saved the picture, is there something wrong with me?
  • charlietuna, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Not that there's anything wrong with that...
  • harrypowers, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Zena?
  • colonelcupcake, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1"I'm sorry sweetie, I just can't sleep with you hanging all over me."
  • Sahdow, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1hehe, bury.....
  • twigboy, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1two guys one hole?
  • clyde2801, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Proof of the failure of ancient Britian's 'don't ask, don't tell' policy...
  • minorgods, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1and the shroud was a multicolored rainbow flag... :)
    I'm so glad they aren't around for this comment. A Saxon could kick my ass... even in a battledress.

  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1As he held her he whispered "may god strike us down if you are really pregnant"....
  • Sahdow, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1hehe.... dugg up
  • theviceroy, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1Simple answer: Pop-sci mags/websites suck.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -1/+2It's the Daily Mail...
    Britain's fox news.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -0/+1It's the Daily Mail. They make ***** up.
  • napalm9295, on 09/08/2008, -1/+1True love never dies...
  • johanesw, on 09/08/2008, -1/+1maybe they were gay couple warriors O.o
  • aComa, on 09/08/2008, -0/+0win.
  • Benno, on 09/08/2008, -1/+1... it must have been something you said.
  • thebza451, on 09/08/2008, -1/+1quit reversing crap around, it's retarded much like your parents.
  • inactive, on 09/08/2008, -2/+2The one on the left is female. The pelvis shape gives it away.
  • drpleau, on 09/08/2008, -0/+0looks like they were snoodling
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.