What is Digg?Sponsored by wix.com
The Ultimate Flash Website Design Tool view!
wix.com - Design a stunning website in 10 easy steps.
140 Comments
- whoreable, on 10/12/2008, -4/+88Lurker Bomb: A fart that is not smelled immediately upon flatulation, but subsequently delivers a potent stench.
- t3hmyth, on 10/12/2008, -1/+72Both really cool, and really horrifying.
- Sylphid15, on 10/12/2008, -1/+59Starcraft II Viral
- tbhurst, on 10/12/2008, -3/+56The lurker? Is that really it's name? Sweet.
- MikeFallopian, on 10/12/2008, -1/+48"Uh, guys? Don't look now, but there's a huge bomb right above us. It's been following us for a while."
"Oh, don't worry about that. It's a friendly bomb. It's just flying its massive payload over our heads to protect us." - palehorse864, on 10/12/2008, -1/+42It's going to be like those cartoons where Wile E. Coyote or some other unfortunate character manages to lose a tracking missile around the corner. They sneak forward and the missile slowly sneaks along behind them hovering in the air. They turn around and then give the missile a "shhhhhhhh" before realizing what's up.
- MakanGuru, on 10/12/2008, -6/+46So when are they going to come up with a "troll" bomb?
You know, a bomb that will drop down on it's target and just start spewing stuff about his mother non-stop until he shoots himself of just goes mad.... - Hollow5, on 10/12/2008, -3/+41lurk moar
- algaeturd, on 10/12/2008, -2/+38Sometimes when I go to the bar people refer to me as 'lurker bomb.'
- jmac7, on 10/12/2008, -0/+31first the bouncing bomb http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bouncing_bomb now the lurker bomb. I gotta give it to the brits, they can be pretty darn crafty!!!
- MakanGuru, on 10/12/2008, -0/+26return to sender......
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+26Tony Stark doesn't have anything better to do?
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+19So someone has to set us up the bomb.
- waywardsoulnf, on 10/12/2008, -0/+18It wont be long before somebody develops "Lurker" Hovering AA
- Antz0rz, on 10/12/2008, -1/+19Every time you masturbate the royal artillery bombs your area.
- goerg, on 10/12/2008, -8/+25when intelligent bombs are so smart...why do they explode at all?
- pstroll, on 10/12/2008, -3/+20... but is it watching me masturbate?
- FENWAYFREAK, on 10/12/2008, -0/+14You almost had something there...
- DanBoodro, on 10/12/2008, -1/+13 What happens after the 10 hours?
- litothegreat, on 10/12/2008, -1/+11so you are saying we can't do that now?
- Albumen, on 10/12/2008, -0/+10Actually in this case it's BRITAIN!!!! ***** YEAH!!!!
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+10yes, they also need the n00b bomb and the fanboy bomb.
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+10Those are all on Digg
- Brii, on 10/12/2008, -0/+9That's the most intimidating thing I've ever seen. I wish it would really just hover in one spot though. That'd be the ultimate *****, dropping a bomb on someone only to have it hover above them for ten minutes.
- DVmaker, on 10/12/2008, -6/+15One day we'll get so efficient at killing that we'll wipe ourselves out.
- craftyguy, on 10/12/2008, -0/+7You called?
- m0llusk, on 10/12/2008, -0/+7Killer robots: We will never stop paying for having invented these.
- Yzzim, on 10/12/2008, -0/+7damn campers
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -1/+7round round it goes what's gonna blast nobody knows.
- acegi, on 10/12/2008, -2/+8creepy. so the bombs now stalk you before it kills you.
another great invention of men to kill each other in different ways. - inactive, on 10/12/2008, -1/+7Doomsday?
- Albumen, on 10/12/2008, -0/+6Ugghhh!!! Who let the pussies in here? This is about bombs man, BOMBS!!
- alittleroy101, on 10/12/2008, -1/+7My concern is that if there isn't an oppurtunity to nail the inital target within that 10 hour window, the operators will feel pressured to use the bomb before it needs to be crashed and pick less deserving targets instead.
- innocentsinner, on 10/12/2008, -0/+6I'm pretty sure that's -exactly- how it's going to work.
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+6...pretty awesome idea. Turns infantry into a completely different animal.
- Albumen, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5"loitering munitions "
You gotta love the Brits for ***** like this. - holzp, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Just make sure your army requires registration. Duh.
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -1/+6...or follow you around on digg with dozens of spoof accounts threatening to violate you?
- EtherGnat, on 10/12/2008, -1/+6Yeah, like it wasn't already horrifying enough having the Black Helicopters following me everywhere, now I've got to worry about these too.
- FaithclubDotNet, on 10/12/2008, -1/+6Terran needed a mobile answer to the lurker. Simply massing marines is a risky cause where you can lose most of your army in one bad tactical error. Bringing in siege tanks is good, but the advance is slow if the lurker user is good. A bomb specifically designed to destroy the lurker is really a weapon of choice in this situation, especially if it has cloak detection.
- Pixelante, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Yes. They can even harass you with phone calls and e-mails. There was this bomb, once, it had hidden itself in a basement half a click from its target. We raided the place, but the bomb had already left. We found hundreds of pictures of its target hanging from the walls, most of them with the eyes cut out. That was one scary bomb. To think it's still loitering somewhere.
- Narcowski, on 10/12/2008, -2/+7I sure hope so, I could deal with a little bit of extra space.
- carpeclunes, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5They did the research for it in the Hydralisk Den.
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Boom goes the dynamite
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -1/+6BOMB BOMB BOMB
KILL KILL KILL - Volatile36, on 10/12/2008, -1/+6We can already. We're just sticking around to tidy up. It's like killing all the enemies in a level of a video game before you move on to the next.
- webjoseph, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Military went from pay-per-use to a subscription payment... we pay every 10-hour/bomb even if we don't use it.
- inactive, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Money. Lots of it.
- Typhoon2009, on 10/12/2008, -0/+5Yes it is wonderful. If it doesn't find a target, they fly it back to base and have it land without being armed. It might be wasted then but hey, it's better than carpet bombing everything and hoping all the civilians were in bunkers.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 145 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is