What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
14 Comments
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -0/+9The only difference between Conservapedia and Wikiality is that the latter knows it's a joke.
- AnteChronos, on 10/11/2007, -0/+8"Founded by conservatives who believe Wikipedia has a liberal bias"
Well, obviously. After all, reality has a well-known liberal bias. - Stonedonkey, on 10/11/2007, -2/+9They aren't conservatives, they're Christian Fundamentalists. Don't take my word for it, though. Look up things like "homosexuality" "Jesus" and "dinosaurs." It was started by a group of home-schooled kids, the leader of whom is the son of Phyllis Schlafly, who actively campaigned against the Equal Rights Amendment.
- Junkyarddawg, on 10/11/2007, -1/+6Yeah, stonedonkey is right; it's the nuttiest religious right that's behind the Conservapedia. Phyllis Schlafly have many many interesting statements behind her, from that it's not rape if a man forces himself on his wife, and that it was a "heresy" that the Supreme Court gets to interprete the constitution.
Of course, none of this should be seen as in any way endorsing registering on Conservapedia and doing amusing, strategically-placed, alterations. Even if, and I want to make this clear, even if it is impossible to make the Conservapedia any less accurate than it already is, and nearly impossible to be so kooky that it stands out. - kurtu5, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5Whats really sad is Wikipedia has more information on Jesus.. Lol Powned!
- atdigg, on 10/11/2007, -0/+5Is not information these people are looking for, and I bet the average atheist knows more about Bible than Christians.
- kurtu5, on 10/11/2007, -0/+4***** man, look up big bang.
http://www.conservapedia.com/Big_Bang
snippet:
Most Atheists believe in the Big Bang theory. There is active research and speculation into what caused the Big Bang, but atheists agree it was not a deity.
Well duh! Of course atheists wouldn't beleive in a deity. - AnteChronos, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3@kurtu5
See, you care too much about the truth, and not enough about truthiness. In other words:
*WHOOSH* - spacefreak, on 10/11/2007, -0/+3That text looks pretty black to me...
- FyreGoddess, on 10/11/2007, -1/+2This blog entry has white text on a white background? WHY?
Although the content makes it worth highlighting, but still... - Icewedge, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0Here is an interesting link on the subject of CP: http://www.rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia
- Cryoes, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0if anyone finds the website to be offensive or bias the guys e-mail is aschlafly(at)aol(dot)com ;) also if anyone is bored and wants to mail bomb it.
- kurtu5, on 10/11/2007, -1/+1No it doesn't. A liberal is a member of a political party. A neocon is a similar animal. Each has their platform and cannot deviate from that platform.
Reality has NO political affiliation. The real problem is describing reality without any political and/or religious bias; not an easy task, just go ask Galileo. - Cryoes, on 10/11/2007, -0/+0The block was made by Bohdan. The reason given is Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "Raeganrules1". The reason given for Raeganrules1's block is: "Sock".
Banned and the reason was sock.. what the hell..
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is