What is Digg?17 Comments
- inactive, on 02/13/2008, -5/+15No it's not, card.
- Hortnon, on 02/13/2008, -3/+10In fact, it's 50% more than freefall.
- inactive, on 02/13/2008, -3/+9This reminds me of conceptkid, and his "There are a billion people living in the U.S." argument...
- inactive, on 02/14/2008, -1/+6Contrary to what you believe, I am not on digg all day. And if card really wants to read a scientific explanation to what happened he can just browse through my favorites list.
- inactive, on 02/13/2008, -6/+8Cow ***** tends to spread when it's dropped on hot cement but, in the end, it's still cow *****.
- duggreen, on 02/15/2008, -1/+2Flee Herky, Flee.
- keithgplayer, on 02/13/2008, -4/+4I guess their rebuttal is just to bury ya. Good rebuttal eh?
- card51short, on 02/13/2008, -4/+4*yawn* Your silence is deafening, deniers. Cmon, tell me how kinetic energy can pulverize a structure almost 2 times its size (40 floors against 70 floors) in just 4 seconds over free fall speed ;)
No? No takers?
Thanks for playing!!! - card51short, on 02/13/2008, -5/+5no YOU'RE cow *****!
Lol I love how Herky doesn't even try to debate any more...he just calls names and flees out the back door. It actually casts him in a much better light than his completely asinine and juvenile argument points. - duggreen, on 02/13/2008, -8/+7Desperate theories by desperate people. The movement is apparently increasing in size so fast that there is cause for alarm.
- card51short, on 02/13/2008, -5/+4surprisingly, it's 100 times better than when they actually try to debate
- card51short, on 02/13/2008, -5/+4WOW HORTY! You mean to tell me that 70 floors of steel and concrete hold up a whole FIFTY PERCENT MORE THAN PURE, THIN AIR!?!
Amazing!!! LOL get outta here you clowns...don't both of you got some amateur hour jokes to crack about Ron Paul? You've only posted 67 today! Get to work!!! Leave the debate to the big boys. (SSN I know you're technically a big boy since you're pushing 50 but IQ does factor in as well) - keithgplayer, on 02/14/2008, -4/+2When did I say you were on digg all day? Since my injury from awhile back I have plenty of free time so I can be on here all day, and I do see you a lot, not that I'm saying you are on here all day though. If your talking about that peer- reviewed paper, that one has been shown to be using assumed parameters to get their formulas from. So no one still knows 100% what happened that day, and probably never will.
- card51short, on 02/13/2008, -6/+4LOL Deniers : Just think about it. I know you already know in your head you are full of ***** but think about it!
70 floors of steel and concrete only provided 4.78 seconds more of resistance than COMPLETE AND TOTAL AIR would of resisted!
hahahhahahahahahaahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaaha oh right the meanie a-rabs with the boxcutters did it , right ? :) - card51short, on 02/13/2008, -5/+3i'm almost completely convinced that even JCM, Herky and some of the other deniers know about 9/11...or at least have their own questions now. Of course, they will never voice them until it becomes entirely trendy and hip. But I think they know...
- card51short, on 02/13/2008, -12/+5"The 9-11 “Truth” Movement insists that the Twin Towers fell at or near free-fall speeds"
The article says the building took 14 seconds to fall. Is 14 seconds not near 9.22 seconds? - card51short, on 02/13/2008, -11/+4You're right...4.78 seconds is just an eternity. How silly of me to think differently!
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is