What is Digg?497 Comments
- wwwspirit, on 10/11/2007, -65/+232Star Wars Jedi, Harry Potter, Jesus... people are REAL touchy about their choice in fantasy fiction.
- jarsfan2k8, on 08/13/2008, -83/+248Grow up people. Why does everything here on Digg have to de-volve into either:
1. Bush rant
2. Christian rant
3. Ron Paul rules all rant - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -12/+125Someone got up a little cranky this morning....
- azAZ09, on 10/11/2007, -9/+110This is a bad idea. A spider could crawl in through the bars then some creationist could try to make believe the spider was created there.
"Prove it wasn't" they will say. - carpespasm, on 10/11/2007, -6/+105if he's a merciful god then he will also put a bucket in there too.
- carpespasm, on 10/11/2007, -29/+114meh, i get it, it's a little funny, but it's mostly just stirring up ***** unnecessarily.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -7/+88See, I told you religionists aren't violent.....
- bradallen18, on 10/11/2007, -6/+864. Apple ; )
- MrHappy123, on 10/11/2007, -16/+93GOD took the website down for making a mockery of him :D
- Fascist, on 10/11/2007, -18/+90GOD WILL PUT A ***** WALRUS INTO THE CAGE.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -6/+77"Could God give a toss about a bunch of arrogant, spoiled, think-you're-actually-clever dicks like you?"
You tell us! Isn't that pretty much the crux of the whole religion thing?
"I don't think so."
Oh..... well... nevermind then. - ToadLeg, on 10/27/2007, -5/+68Sorry but Harry Potter is not fantasy fiction.
- joemofo214, on 10/11/2007, -8/+68haha, If I were god, I would put a man-bear-pig in there
- iamafatguy, on 10/11/2007, -6/+66Wow. is that wjwd?
- zephc, on 10/11/2007, -6/+60Logically, God put the most awesome animal in there, but the Devil took it away!
- Syntaxis, on 10/11/2007, -7/+58Hahaha fantastic, brilliant, religious nuts always keep me entertained.. they always reach a certain point where they resort to one of these:
1. "LALALALALA! I can't hear you! LALALA" (christians)
2. You need to respect religion or I'm gonna kick your ass! (redneck christians)
3. Allahu akhbar! BOOM! (muslim fanatics)
4. Evolution? I AM NOT A MONKEY! (all of em)
And every religious person thinks that his own personal invisible friend (and conveniently, also creator of the universe) that he was taught from birth to believe in is real, and nothing else can be true. No proof required. - gungaroo22, on 10/11/2007, -4/+53The news on Digg represents the user base's opinion, in general.
The majority of diggers like/care/digg those subjects.
Why can't you understand the basics of a social news site? - inactive, on 10/11/2007, -5/+52"Could God give a toss about a bunch of arrogant, spoiled, think-you're-actually-clever dicks like you?"
Yes; otherwise why would He care if you worshiped Him or not?
Matthew 10:29-31 --
Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and one of them shall not fall on the ground without your Father.
But the very hairs of your head are all numbered.
Fear ye not therefore, ye are of more value than many sparrows.
Seems God gives a toss about lots of things. Omniscience, you know. - Fieri, on 10/11/2007, -6/+52He can't just put one creature in the cage. It would go extinct in one generation. =(
- ziffel, on 10/11/2007, -2/+46Ah, you must be a True Christian.
- Azimuth1, on 10/11/2007, -3/+47That's what they want you to think.
- adamwho, on 10/11/2007, -7/+50God forbid we have a democratic forum.
- GMorgan, on 10/11/2007, -12/+52I know. Pfft, you'd think they had a real religion like Pastafarianism.
I mean, how many deities offer you a stripper factory and beer volcanoes. You know it makes sense. - ToastyMallows, on 10/11/2007, -25/+65Haha hilarious.
I love being an Atheist!
NO GOD!
Digg me down. =D - cptn_cardboard, on 10/11/2007, -2/+40What if I DOUBLE DOG DARE HIM?
- Yawgmoth, on 10/11/2007, -1/+38In the comments under the picture a person named Fact vs theory made an incorrect statement that is all too common. He stated that evolution was only a theory and he wouldn't believe it until it has become a law.
A law has no more proof or acceptance then a theory does. While the words are used differently among scientists (mainly which field of science they work in), There is no scientifical hierarchy for theories. A law is a description or observation which is usually simple or mathematical in nature .(ie: Matter attracts matter. Things in motion tend to stay in motion. ) A theory is WHY that happens. (ie :Matter attracts matter because it curves space. ) Whether it is universally accepted has everything to do with the validity of the law or theory and nothing to do with it's name. from wikipedia: Scientific laws are similar to scientific theories in that they are principles which can be used to predict the behavior of the natural world. Both scientific laws and scientific theories are typically well-supported by observations and/or experimental evidence. Usually scientific laws refer to rules for how nature will behave under certain conditions.[3] Scientific theories are more overarching explanations of how nature works and why it exhibits certain characteristics
see http://science.kennesaw.edu/~rmatson/3380theory.html if you're still confused, or ask anyone with a serious scientific background. - ToadLeg, on 10/11/2007, -2/+39I wonder why "macfan76" didn't include Apple? It's the first thing I would have included.
- morg666, on 10/11/2007, -2/+35Yes it means the same thing as "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."
- rushiku, on 10/11/2007, -1/+33I can think of a simple solution...
- CerealFan, on 10/11/2007, -2/+34Mirror: http://www.sciencehumor.org.nyud.net:8080/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/cage.jpg
- zephc, on 10/11/2007, -7/+38What respect has Creationism garnered that we missed? Where it presented a coherent and falsifiable theory? Oh wait, that hasn't happened yet (and I don't see it happening in the future). It deserves nothing more than Myth status, along with every other creation myth.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+31well duh.. How could i not hate an "all powerful" being who would allow ANYONE to suffer in eternal torment, just for GENUINELY seeking the truth!
- RamezaniK, on 10/11/2007, -2/+31Dude, you're an idiot--you don't need a space between the last word of the sentence and the question mark.
- Shadic, on 10/11/2007, -2/+30"We could all use a laugh at something that genuinely IS FUNNY."
Your moronic ranting is funny, does that count? - GMorgan, on 10/11/2007, -1/+27Nah, the FSM just knocked out the site for non-believers* in order to trick them into believing that laughable god story.
*he alters the packets with his noodly appendage before they reach the network stack. - Nowaiman, on 10/11/2007, -15/+40If you want me to start sounding bible on you, God isn't usually one to be tempted, noob.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+25LOL I love Digg cause it just show how ***** stupid people are.
Do you came in a Mattell doll version with a string coming out of your ass? - Riffraffs, on 10/11/2007, -0/+24science will never truly satisfy you because you've closed your mind to any argument other then a god created everything.
- inactive, on 10/11/2007, -1/+25Because idiots are funny to laugh at.
- smackhero, on 10/11/2007, -2/+26that's not how evolution works. there's nothing that states that evolutionary forces make present day organism become bigger. also, the bacteria in the cage might very well evolve into something else bigger or smaller, but it won't happen fast enough for you to observe in your lifetime.
you've just demonstrated the sophistry of creationist rhetoric that is rooted in a lack of scientific understanding. - stormgren, on 10/11/2007, -1/+24Argument from ignorance. I can't understand how it would happen without Jeebus, thus it didn't happen without Jeebus.
Patently false, dutchdude. - elementfire, on 10/11/2007, -1/+24Yeah, it's a historical work. Get with the program.
- Azio, on 10/11/2007, -2/+25I love it when right wingers think they're independent, non-impressionable rebels.
- WestonP, on 10/11/2007, -12/+35Rather than needlessly persecuting and trashing on religious people, why not show them that you're capable of being decent, and respectful, human beings? You know... send a positive message for a change. If all they see from you is hate and intolerance, then they're going to view your actions as evil, because that's what it is. And the more they see evil attacking their faith, the more it confirms their faith.
Go ahead, digg me down for telling the truth and trying to help both sides... - kinerry, on 10/11/2007, -0/+20Hate god? what are you talking about? you think atheist are atheist because they hate god? how can you hate something that most likely does not exist?
- KalvinCoolEdge, on 10/11/2007, -2/+22What? Are you serious? That's not remotely true - do a little research. Where did you get these ideas?
I think the idea that you are getting at is that you have to be genetically identical to your partner to conceive? If you believe this you and your husband/brother/identical twin are going to be trying a long time for that baby. Evolution(and survival) THRIVE on the differences. Interbreeding causes all sorts of genetic problems.
And yes, i know that twins aren't technically identical either...
Oh please post a link to some of the evidence you have that the earth is only 3000 years old. It would be good fodder against those ridiculous xtians who believe the earth is 6000 years old.(crazy but true!) - quentinmcalmott, on 10/11/2007, -2/+22It only is significant if you believe the book of Matthew was written by God, possibly through a human. If you think it was just written down by some guy, it means nothing.
- romistrub, on 10/11/2007, -4/+24Yep. It means that the people who invented the bible didn't want their subjects to question it.
- ElGuano, on 10/11/2007, -2/+21Why? Can't He just make it not go extinct?
- curtvdh, on 10/11/2007, -0/+19"let's just assume He's always been here"
Google for "circular argument", and try again. -
Show 51 - 100 of 494 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 