Digg

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

UPDATE: No Criminal Charges Filed in "Wee for Wii" Contest

kcra.com — No criminal charges will be filed following the death of a woman who took part in a radio station water-drinking contest in January. Jennifer Strange died of water intoxication while trying to win a Nintendo Wii for her children. What a sad story.

Bury

webkid 1 year 97 days ago, made popular 1 year 97 days ago

909 diggs
digg it

swoosh_bnd, on 10/12/2007, -40/+28How is there not basis for a criminal charge? The radio station didn't tell them that they could die from water intoxication. The family ought to press something, probably the next step would be suing them broke.
- N1NJ4hippie, on 10/12/2007, -8/+35"She knew what the contest involved when she entered it, and had the option to stop or discontinue her participation in the contest at any time."
  
  "Finally, and most importantly in our decision not to file involuntary manslaughter charges, there were no observable indications or symptoms that Jennifer Strange was experiencing a serious medical emergency"
  
  So if she didn't have any observable indications or symptoms then more than likely she didn't feel anything wrong with herself and that is why she didn't discontinue her participation.
- DonWilson, on 10/12/2007, -15/+4This is an update from http://www.digg.com/gaming_news/Women_Dies_after_a_Hold_your_wee_for_a_Wii_Radio_Contest
- sofaKing812, on 10/12/2007, -49/+7The only thing that is criminal is that the anything Wii related continues to dominate the front page.*
  
  *I am a happy Wii owner, but seriously, there were something like five Wii front page stories that were not so great in the last 10-13 hours.
  
  http://www.infendo.com/2007/04/miyamoto-wii-enhancements-coming-for.html
  http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSN0236164420070402
  http://www.nintendowiifanboy.com/2007/04/02/man-wins-wii-from-stacker-machine/
  http://gonintendo.com/?p=15467
  http://www.kcra.com/news/11497976/detail.html?rss=sac&psp=news
  
  Fanboys/girls take aim.
- undergrace, on 10/12/2007, -9/+25Although the criminal charges were dropped, the *civil* lawsuit still stands... they're being sued for 1) Wrongful Death:Negligence 2) Survivor's Action: Negligence 3) Wrongful Death:Intentional/Reckless Conduct & 4) Survivor's Action:Intentional/Reckless Conduct. Hopefully the Strange family can get some justice with atleast one of those!
  http://www.kcra.com/news/10842107/detail.html
  http://www.kcra.com/download/2007/0125/10843736.pdf
- dopplerdog, on 10/12/2007, -14/+21@sp3rm
  
  "The radio station also didn't tell her that if she went to sleep in a furnace, she'd probably wake up crispy dead. STRANGE that she didn't have the common sense to stop drinking water when her body told her NO NO NO."
  
  The lady in question made a mistake, and paid for it with her life. What is being discussed now is not whether she was stupid (I don't believe she was, a lot of people aren't aware of the dangers of this). What is being discussed is the culpability of the radio station. If the station unknowingly offered people a glass of poison, and asked these people to take a drink *without* taking adequate care, I think it'd be pretty stupid to then argue that the victims "should have had enough sense to not drink from the glass". There was an implicit assumption of trust by the victim, regardless of how misplaced it was - and an implicit responsibility by the station to check first. The victim paid a price. How about the station?
- batmang, on 10/12/2007, -23/+14Natural selection anyone?
- mitrovarr, on 10/12/2007, -4/+34"The radio station also didn't tell her that if she went to sleep in a furnace, she'd probably wake up crispy dead."
  
  The idea that you die from drinking too much water isn't exactly self evident or well known. I'm a biologist, and even I didn't believe water intoxication was real until I had looked it up. I imagine most people think that the worst thing that can occur from drinking too much water is the same thing that happens if you eat too much (i.e. vomiting.) It's surprising the body doesn't have a mechanism to prevent it from potentially being fatal.
- Egoist, on 10/12/2007, -11/+27"How is there not basis for a criminal charge? The radio station didn't tell them that they could die from water intoxication."
  
  Perhaps because the prosecutor believes in personal responsibility?
- thatsmyaibo, on 10/12/2007, -9/+15What the radio station did was hold an idiotic contest that put people at harm for a prize. But nobody forced her to do this and she signed a waiver that acknowledged the consequences. It's not right to call the woman stupid for doing this because I am sure the chances of water intoxication is very slight, but nobody can be held accountable for her own actions. This country needs to stop awarding money to people for every untied knot in the system. This is a bigger problem now than it has ever been.
- b3mus3d, on 10/12/2007, -2/+24sofaking - I'm digging you down. Not because I'm a fanboy. Because somebody tragically and unnecessarily died and all you can do is ***** whine about the gaming section of digg,
- tunacubes, on 10/12/2007, -8/+10For all of you saying that it's common sense, and she shouldnt have done it:
  
  A lot of people aren't aware that too much water can kill you. And even if it IS common sense, that doesn't mean the radio station didn't do anything wrong since the people "Shouldn't have done it".. The radio station did something that risked the lives of those people, and from the audio that Desistere posted, you can hear that they even said "We should've researched this".. Then they just keep joking about how someone's dying, and how they don't care because they signed release forms. Well, someone DID die, and they all got fired and won't be able to get jobs on Radio ever again.. Release form didn't protect you from THAT, did it?
- kfxrcer, on 10/12/2007, -13/+8shut up they don't deserve *****. if you're to stupid to not know when to quit then its your own damn fault. I'm stupid and even i know not to drink that much water.
- s0nicfreak, on 10/12/2007, -4/+17Even if the possibility of water intoxication isn't common sense (although I think it's pretty sad that someone with kids wasn't aware of it, and the fact that too much of ANY one thing can kill you), she should of at least known that holding your urine in for too long is dangerous... As sad as this situation is, at least she didn't discover these things when one of her kids was sick and she kept telling it to drink water, or when one of her kids got a bladder/urinary tract/kidney infection because she wouldn't pull over during a long car ride.
  
  Besides, a nurse called in and told them about the possibility for water intoxication, so even if the lady wasn't aware of it before the contest, she became aware of it during the contest. And even if that nurse hadn't called in... people should he held accountable for their own ignorance.
- aggies11, on 10/12/2007, -1/+12"It's surprising the body doesn't have a mechanism to prevent it from potentially being fatal."
  
  Unfortunately the body does, it's called urination. The reason she died is because the contest expressly prevented the body's mechanism for dealing with the condition. :(
  
  Initially I was ready to say that this was just an unfortunate accident on both parts. It wasn't reasonable to expect people to know about water intoxification. However the clips from the radio clearly show that the radio station was aware, and didn't take it seriously. That shows negligence. And the negligence wasn't even in good faith as some of the comments show them being pretty crass about it.
  
  Aggies
- ldkronos, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7@kfxrcer
  "I'm stupid"
  
  You got that right.
- Xarou, on 10/12/2007, -7/+5This is retarded, the ruling that is. I made this comment last time this was brought up. There have been fraternities kicked off campus and getting their charter taken away because of some pledge got water intoxication. The fraternities got in trouble for it. The pledges knew as much as Mrs. Strange, but yet when they died from water intoxication, the fraternity got in trouble for it. But in this case, the radio station, which was in the same position as the fraternity, didn't. It's a double standard. I hope any fraternity that got in trouble for this, goes back and contests it. Now there is a case that works in their favor. I myself believe that the radio station, like the fraternity, should be held accountable. They should at least get in trouble for hazing, because that is what they did.
- swollentiki, on 10/12/2007, -2/+10A fraternity getting kicked off a college campus is not the same thing as criminal charges. What you are referring to is either hazing or the college didn't want a bad image because of that frat. And a college has every right to revoke a frats charter as it sees fit.
  
  I agree, there should be no criminal charges because the WOMAN HAD RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER OWN ACTIONS!!! Doesn't matter how cold hearted the DJ's where, the woman could have stopped drinking the water at any time, or not even enter the contest. No one held a gun to her head and made her drink all that water. As sad as it made be, there really wasn't anything criminal about this.
  
  However, the family of the woman could sue the DJ's and radio station in civil court, but I think that's about it.
- TheWorm, on 10/12/2007, -6/+1I think knowing that you killed someone in a contest is punishment enough. I can't even imagine. I think people who killed out of hate, and would do it again should be charged, but I don't think that applies to a couple stupid djs.
- kylesellers, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6@swoosh_bnd
  "How is there not basis for a criminal charge?"
  
  Because negligence is not criminal--it is a CIVIL offense. A civil offense which is pretty much an open and shut case. Even gross negligence is not criminal, unless very specific qualifications are met. Sorry if that disappoints you, but that's the law.
- ipodsweatshop, on 10/12/2007, -5/+4Darwin wins again!
- emjaymj, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3@Egoist
  
  What an ignorant comment. I'm all for personal responsibility, but this does not just fall under the domain of personal responsibility. Water is perceived by many to be pretty much the safest thing in the world to consume. If somebody were to be ignorant of the harmful effects of swallowing cyanide but somebody in a position of trust not only implied it was safe, but offered you a reward for doing it, they would be liable. This is no different.
- emjaymj, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2On a related note, I bet if this woman had Downs Syndrome or was otherwise mentally impaired, the sentiment would be much different. But this just results in ignorance of that fact that drinking so much water is dangerous. What if she was just REALLY stupid? Where do you draw the line? You morons crying personal responsibility only understand the concept on the most basic of levels, which shows that half of you are probably dumb enough to have done the same thing in her shoes.
  
  What if the radio station had instead held a contest to see who was brave enough to jump 50 feet into a lake, but neglected to research the fact that the water was only 6 inches deep at that spot? It is reasonable for the average person to assume that the radio station or any company sponsoring a contest has done their homework to ensure the safety of the participants.
- ldkronos, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2@kylesellers:
  "Because negligence is not criminal--it is a CIVIL offense."
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_negligence
- mommyjo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0What happened to this woman was tragic. However, I do not believe the radio station is to be blamed. It was a contest. There were rules. It may not have been the best idea for a contest, but hindsight is always 20/20. I did not know myself that you could die from water intoxication...it seems silly. On the other hand, I was taught as a child that it is not good to "hold it". If you have to go, you go. Is a console really worth it? Maybe her family is trying to vent their anger at the radio station to bring resolution to their daughter's pointless death, I don't know.
- pwill, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1"I'm a biologist, and even I didn't believe water intoxication was real until I had looked it up."
  
  This tells me you can't be a great biologist.
  Any biologist should know that too much of any substance ever will kill you. I could die from eating too many vegetables.
- sgglynn, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2"The radio station didn't tell them that they could die from water intoxication. "
  Really? I guess those liability waivers they made each contestant sign was just a piece of paper saying "water is fun, water is fun...." I could be wrong though, it has happened before
- taraba, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@ Aggies
  "Unfortunately the body does, it's called urination. "
  
  No, that doesn't prevent water intoxication.
  
  @ sgglynn
  
  I think radio stations make you sign waivers for pretty much anything. It costs a little bit of ink and paper on their end and gives them some sort of legal stance to say that they can't be sued for anything that happened.
  
  Still, I can't believe that people are saying that it was her fault. It's not like they were playing Russian Roulette where there was an obvious chance of death. In the audio recording of the show you can hear the people telling her that she'll throw up before anything bad happens. So, they convinced her that her life wasn't in danger in their own contest.
- aaronm67, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@Xarou
  
  Having a fraternities charter taken away is punishment, yes, but it's not a criminal charge. The radio station is still being sued. There is a big difference between criminal manslaughter charges and having a charter taken away.
  
  EDIT: oops, what i said was already said.
- mitrovarr, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1"Unfortunately the body does, it's called urination. The reason she died is because the contest expressly prevented the body's mechanism for dealing with the condition."
  
  Actually, you can still get water intoxication no matter how much urine you shed. It has to do with depletion of body electrolytes and alteration of body chemistry.
morrislevy, on 10/12/2007, -35/+4A shame to society indeed when someone dies from not pissing. What a sad story indeed.
- N1NJ4hippie, on 10/12/2007, -7/+28First off morrislevy you are a dick.
  
  Yes it is a shame to society when those responsible for this contest new full well the effects this stunt could have. A nurse called to tell them that someone could die from drinking to much water, they heard of the story about the college hazing where someone died from drinking to much water, and the worst thing they did was make jokes saying, "Hey has anybody died yet?" This is truly disgusting.
  
  But morrislevy go on back to laughing at the death of a mother of two. It is really funny.
- bovester, on 10/12/2007, -1/+22And it's more ***** up that the article doesn't even mention that. It makes the radio station look like they had didn't even know it could happen.
- MrStabby, on 10/12/2007, -7/+4You two have some twisted logic...
  
  What you're essentially saying is that anyone who holds a contest, where there is a slight possibility of danger, is automatically held responsible when something out of their control DOES go wrong?
  
  That's like blaming Nathan's hot dogs, if some year one of their contestants chokes on a wiener...
  
  And on the point about the "jokes" by the radio station, they weren't cracking those jokes expecting someone to die, they were simply having a laugh at the sheer ridiculousness of the people who are willing to go through with this stupid contest...If you went bungee jumping with a friend, would you consider it morally irresponsible to joke that "we might have cut your cord too long, but let's jump anyway" or something along those lines?
  
  This woman died a tragic death, sure...and the radio station didn't outright SAY in simple terms "Drinking water can kill you", but eventually you have to draw the line where simple common sense and personal responsibility comes into play, this woman simply made some poor choices...
- metalhead87, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1That's complete *****. The contest never should have been held...at least not the way it was. They didn't research a damn thing....they just assumed, "It's water....nothing bad can happen." The woman, as a lot of people, probably never even heard of water intoxication. If the station knew of it, why not just make the contest to drink a couple things of water, instead of the insane amounts they had them drink? Why hold a contest that is potentially that dangerous? There is no sense in it.
merdiesel, on 10/12/2007, -5/+19Although i think its ridiculous that no one is being held accountable for the incident, that piece of ***** radio station and anyone involved in putting together that contest will have to live with that ladies blood on their hands for the rest of their lives.
desistere, on 10/12/2007, -2/+51Here's a link to the radio show commentary during the competition:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks-MBtZXpjY

Some of the terrible lines in hindsight:

"Can't you get like water poisoning and like die?"
"NO!"
"Maybe we should have researched this"

"I want to say that those people could get water intoxication and die."
"Yes, we're aware of that. They signed releases so we're not responsible. So it's okay."
"How come you guys didn't do it"
"Cause we don't want to die"

"Is anybody dying in there"
"We've got a guy that's just about to die"
"Make sure you get the release. Get the insurance on that."
- catharz, on 10/12/2007, -15/+10I'll never understand the litigiousness of US society. You guys can break a nail while picking your nose and then sue your plastic surgeon for making your nose shorter. o.O
  
  As for the Wii? I like the Wii and got one at launch. It's an interesting concept, but way too short on games. I'm way over the hype of it and it's now gathering dust. It also seems like we have an excess of them here (Australia). Last week I noticed a sign outside a local communications store giving them away with a Nokia mobile phone (on a 36 month plan).
- ericdano, on 10/12/2007, -6/+15These morons should never be allowed on the air again. Period. Listening to them, there is really no excuse. Hopefully they will be found guilty in the civil trial.
fober, on 10/12/2007, -15/+4I'm kind of late on this one, but did they give the lady's son a Wii?
- 3rnesto, on 10/12/2007, -7/+10If anything they should pay for her kids to go to college.
obf213, on 10/12/2007, -11/+1I don't think anyone deserves to be sued, and I also don't think she was fully aware of the risks. Honestly, who knew there were risks to chugging water, I sure didn't I probably would have done the same thing, most ppl think drinking too much water will make u need to the use the bathroom a lot but thats all. Water Intoxication is something not well not whatsoever.
- addictedidol, on 10/12/2007, -2/+13"Water Intoxication is something not well not whatsoever."
  
  WTF?
- SkippyDoorknob, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Dishwasher noodle yucky ransom peel.
- bitbytebit, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0@addictedidol
  
  R U stoopid? can't you use the context .. water intoxication is not well understood, not whatsoever
  
  but instead of using your brain I guess you think its funny to post wtf?
CompanyMan, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3Jennifer Strange was an adult who was voluntarily participating in the radio contest," Scully's office said elsewhere in the statement. "She knew what the contest involved when she entered it, and had the option to stop or discontinue her participation in the contest at any time."

Sad but true.

Although with the Radio Show commentary making jest and talk about die if you hold your water ,that should hold up in Civil Court. I would hope that the family gets some closure in all this. And at the very least Nintendo should give the kids or the radio station the kids a Wii !! After all the mother died for it to get for her kids. At the very least they deserve the dam console...........

Than again maybe they or the family never want to hear the name Nintendo Wii ever again. And just after Xmas too !!

This is truly a sad story
- taraba, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1But are you sure she really knew what the contest involved? The radio station's people told her (you can hear it in the audio recording) that she will get sick and throw up and then be fine. They fed her wrong information on which she based her decisions.
slimnickyy, on 10/12/2007, -4/+11There is no (criminal) wrong for something like this. However, this does not mean the family of the deceased cannot bring an action in tort, as they (DJs) likely did have a duty of care, and were likely to be negligent in their actions.
- kurtu5, on 10/12/2007, -5/+3Digg him down all you want, but he sounds more informed than the rest of you.
slimnickyy, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6@dopplerdog

Criminal law shouldn't sanction others for another's mistake. That's not how it works, nor should it ever. Again, the family still has a course of action, but no one is going to jail.
SavageBlackCat, on 10/12/2007, -4/+3Score one for common sense.
suldar, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1Personally, I hope the radio station has to pay a bunch of money as a result of this. I also hope this causes them to be a lot more careful in the future. Thirty seconds of research online should have told them this was a ridiculous idea.
- scrimp212, on 10/12/2007, -3/+3I was actually hoping the radio station would lose their FCC license and the DJs never work as DJs ever again for pulling off such a stupid stunt on live radio
- DextersWorld, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1Taking two seconds to say to herself, "I have to pee, give up the Wii" would have saved her life. But she didn't, so it's the radio station's fault? Yeah, that makes sense.
joper90, on 10/12/2007, -0/+19didn't a nurse phone up and say this was life threatening and a stupid idea... at which point they laughed and cut her off?
Alphateam, on 10/12/2007, -10/+1What a dumb bitch.
She must have ruined video games for her kids for life now.
I'm sure they all hate them now. What a waste of good entertainment.
The Wii is fun as hell. I'm sure they have no interest now. Think of all the lost revenue for the video game industry now that a whole family will never buy them again. This is such a sad story.
tehperil, on 10/12/2007, -6/+7All the "personal responsibility" fanboys here seem to have happily ignored that the radio station had a responsibility too. Oh well. Let's hope the civil case puts the radio station out of business.
- Egoist, on 10/12/2007, -7/+6"Personal responsibility fanboys"?!? WTF. How old are you? If I sell you a baseball bat, I am not responsible because I didn't tell you that bashing it against your head will kill you.
  
  If anyone wants to know why our society is so litigious and why we have no personal responsibility, it's because of people like you.
- reed311, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3The woman did this for a luxury item. I don't know how you can have sympathy for someone who was risking their life to attain an optional material possession.
Galaeron, on 10/12/2007, -4/+6You guys seriously cannot have an opinion until you heard the radio show when they were talking about doing the contest. Note this is not the same day of the contest. Listeners actually called in and told them that it was a bad idea to do the contest because people could die from drinking to much water without release. The radio station's response to these calls? "It's ok, they sign a waiver." I wish these bastard would burn in hell, not even a thought towards human life, just ratings. Not to mention the name of the game was completely incorrect. "Wee for a Wii" mean you actually have to piss to get the wii, where in the contest, the first to piss lost.

Not only are these guy uncaring bastards, but they are also idiots. You should be able to find the clips on the web somewhere. My local radio station had the clips.
- Toupee, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3It was really 'Hold Your Wee for a Wii.' But yeah, it's still dumb.
  
  I actually just recently took a seminar with a guy named Jeff Brown. Real cool guy, he's been in radio for decades doing all kinds of different jobs, and he was about to show us some examples of bad promotions... and then this came along, and it was really the only example he needed.
antoniojvr, on 10/12/2007, -10/+2BREAKING UPDATE: Who gives a crap.
BooChihuahua, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6kfxrcer 1 hour ago
"shut up they don't deserve *****. if you're to stupid to not know when to quit then its your own damn fault. I'm stupid and even i know not to drink that much water."

You're right about one thing. You are definitely stupid. Retarded even!
ventralnet, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0@galaeron

She was an adult... She heard the caller also... Im sick of everything thinking you should have your damn hand held through life
- graywolf323, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4where's the proof she heard the caller? from what I heard it sounds like the radio hosts heard the caller but the people doing the contests were somewhere else completely, who knows if they were listening to the radio show or even paying attention while drinking all that water
- Galaeron, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You ***** idiot, the call wasn't even the same day as the contest, there is no telling when or if she heard the call. Also I don't know about you, but I never heard of dieing from drinking to much water before this happened.
  
  You're right, she shouldn't have her hand held through life. It doesn't mean she should not have been presented with the information and it also doesn't mean the radio station shouldn't have listened to concerned callers. And don't even try to use "she signed the waiver" excuse. The waiver more than likely says "In the result of an accident, this radio station will not be held accountable" It doesn't say "WARNING: YOU CAN DIE FROM DRINKING TO MUCH WATER".
  
  Also learn to use the reply function.
xynder, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1They can still be sued for damages. Remember when O.J. was found not guilty in the criminal case? He was found guilty, still, in the proceeding civil case? Why?

Because, in a civil case, the burden of proof is _MUCH LESS_. All they need is a preponderance (a majority) of the evidence, rather than proof "beyond a reasonable doubt." Of course, a preponderance is already well established if you sue someone after they've been found guilty in criminal court, but it's still possible to establish it even if they haven't.
Zorn85, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Was this incredibly bad judgement and ill preparation on the part of the radio station? Absolutely. But at the same time, anytime you are about to do anything that involves putting large amounts of something into your body, and you don't at least look into it, you bear a good amount of personal responsibility yourself. In my opinion both stupidities cancel each other out and no one should really be charged with manslaughter.
logosx1, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0This torpedoes the civil lawsuit's quest for punitive damages. Punitive damages are awardable only when the defendant's conduct amounts to, at a bare minimum, criminal negligence (reckless disregard, etc.). Therefore, the plaintiff's attorney has shot himself in the foot by agreeing with the DA's announcement that no criminal activity took place.

The rest of the civil lawsuit is also crippled by the DA's explanation that the station owed no duty to the deceased -- no duty means no civil liability. At least the plaintiff's attorney didn't go on record agreeing with that, too!
civperc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Bad situation all around. Radio station should have never held such a contest, but then again, the woman should have known better, in my opinion. I feel terrible for her kids and the father :-
reed311, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4The woman was an adult who willingly engaged in this activity for a material possession. She could have stopped at any minute or not participated at all. This would set a dangerous precedant were there to be charges filed against someone in this case. No reasonable person, outside of a doctor, would have assumed that she was going to die from what happened during that contest. It was, simply, a tragic event; but she is, ultimately, 100% responsible for her actions.
zilch321, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4How many different situations can we apply this same type of scenario to? How often now can we do something of our own free will that later causes us harm that we can now blame someone else for? Its human nature to hate to be wrong and our government has enabled us not only to get away with being wrong but to punish others for our mistakes.
sealjosh, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1"Jennifer Strange was an adult who was voluntarily participating in the radio contest," Scully's office said elsewhere in the statement. "She knew what the contest involved when she entered it, and had the option to stop or discontinue her participation in the contest at any time."

"Finally, and most importantly in our decision not to file involuntary manslaughter charges, there were no observable indications or symptoms that Jennifer Strange was experiencing a serious medical emergency which would have required station employees to seek or administer medical aid to her," the district attorney's statement added.

Its not the radio station's fault that she can't balance the risk vs. reward between possible death, and winning a nintendo wii
sparkmonkeyz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I don't know what I would do if I was the judge on this case. This is all so crazy, seeing that I was actually listening when she died, because I am in the Sacramento area. I don't listen to them anymore, especially since they didn't even give an apology or anything on air, until it blew up into big news. It didn't hit digg or any major newspaper until about 2 weeks later, which was when they finally started to act like it was a big deal.
BlowPurp, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0You put on a contest which is potentially fatal, and because you didn't know, it isn't negligence?
pabster, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1This whole deal is pathetic.

Whatever happened to PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY in this country? The fact that criminal charges were even considered is ludicrous.

The civil action should be dismissed immediately. The family is just looking for some cash.
Sleepyfox, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0"The radio station didn't tell them that they could die from water intoxication."

LMAO! You should become a lawyer.

"My client is suing the American Lifeguards Association because they never warned him that he could die from inhaling water."

defendant's lawyer: "objection, your an idiot."
judge: "objection sustained, please refrain from being so f-ing stupid."
levyjl1988, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1She would have had better chances playing that Stackerz arcade game... (see other digg story)
ElvenBlaze, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0that just pisses me off.
phillydrifter, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Dumb bitch got exactly what she deserved.
bubbazanetti, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1So the form she signed said "Danger, there is a chance you could die of water intoxication if you drink too much...sign on the dotted line if you agree to take full responsibility for your death"?

Remember the whole shouting "fire" in a crowded theater rule? If you do a prank that ends up killing people, you can be held responsible for their deaths.

You go to Disneyland and ride the coasters...if you die because of a poor design of the coaster isn't the maker of the coaster, and the owner operator responsible? You take your kids to the amusement park with the belief that as long as you follow the rules...you will not get killed.

This person went into this contest with the same belief...she trusted that the people operating the contest would conduct it in a safe manner...it was not.

The radio station took responsibility once they held this contest...there was a trust by the contestants that what they were doing was safe/legal/etc.

Now if the contest was "do something stupid" and the contestants did their own stunts without any prior knowledge or accountability by the radio station...then MAYBE they wouldn't be responsible.

I hope those of you that don't understand that the radio station was wrong, don't have kids of their own and use survival of the fittest to determine which child lives.
m98076, on 05/25/2008, -0/+0I found the following articles on ezine articles to be very useful as well:

http://ezinearticles.com/?Does-Hydroxycut-Live-Up- ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Learn-The-Truth-About-Be ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Best-Weight-Loss-Pills&i ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Alli---Is-It-Among-The-B ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Does-Lipovarin-Qualify-T ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Best-Weight-Loss-Pills-O ...
http://ezinearticles.com/?Is-Phentermine-Among-The ...
Login or register to add a comment

Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.

UPDATE: No Criminal Charges Filed in "Wee for Wii" Contest

Login or register to add a comment