The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.
New revealing Starbucks logo has group screaming 'Slutbucks!
startribune.com — Oh no! This tiny logo will emotionally scar people for life! I miss the days when the Christians were eaten by lions for sport.
ZandorMonkeyBoy- 26 diggs
- digg it
- neognostic, on 05/15/2008, -3/+7What a bunch of prudes, The Sun newspaper in the UK has a topless girl on page 3 of the paper every day, or at least it did when I was there 5 years ago. Can any of our UK diggers confirm that this great tradition continues?
- danmat06, on 05/15/2008, -1/+4Indeed it does, and i've seen pimp 13 year olds buying it for the boobs.
- bluto36, on 05/15/2008, -0/+2I'm a pimp 30 year old and thats why i buy it
- danmat06, on 05/15/2008, -1/+4Indeed it does, and i've seen pimp 13 year olds buying it for the boobs.
- SistaSue, on 05/15/2008, -3/+4Hey Paul Walsh the first rule in Journalism is to check your facts, your style of reporting is why no one reads the newspaper anymore either you are an idiot or just plan lazy... either way you need to check your facts before you submit an article, the image displayed is not the correct logo In the new logo, the breast or covered by the siren’s hair
- ZandorMonkeyBoy, on 05/15/2008, -3/+2Dugg down because your grammar is atrocious.
- brothaslide, on 05/15/2008, -1/+3Zandor - Dug down because your looking at style over substance.
- bluto36, on 05/15/2008, -0/+2broth;
dugg down for use of a - Crap why do i keep doing that
- bluto36, on 05/15/2008, -0/+2broth;
- tonicboy, on 05/16/2008, -0/+1What the hell are you saying? I can't understand a word. Which image are you referring to which is not the correct logo? When you say "new logo", are you referring to the 2nd-gen logo which has been used for years, or the new "modified-retro" logo? The modified-retro logo does indeed have the breasts covered by hair, as shown correctly in the top image. The original logo displayed on the bottom of the article also correctly displays the mermaid with bare breasts. The middle logo, the green one which most of us are familiar with, also correctly shows covered breasts with no split legs. Three logos, all correct.
- brothaslide, on 05/15/2008, -1/+1I noticed that SB was using a new logo but I didn't look that closely to notice anything exposed.
- bluto36, on 05/15/2008, -0/+2slutbucks! love it!
- InRussetShadows, on 05/15/2008, -1/+5I miss the days when we had duels. I'd challenge the submitter to a duel and fill him full of lead, just to show him that wishing murder on others is ungentlemanly.
- bluto36, on 05/15/2008, -2/+1didnt you just..... nevermind dugg up for wanting to duel
- drachemorder, on 05/15/2008, -1/+2Eh ... they're just doing a temporary retro thing with their old logo. They even modified it to remove the explicit nudity (her hair is covering the naughty bits now). Nothing to see here people (except the disgusting anti-Christian bias of the article submitter, for which it is buried). Move along.
- Marinium, on 05/15/2008, -0/+2I dugg expressly for the word Slutbucks. Thats a nickname I hope takes off and sticks.
- JustAn0th3rFace, on 05/16/2008, -1/+1Way to be unbiased and the better person, submitter. I just wish i read your summary before digging and about to post a comment.. but now i think you are just as bad as the Christian group.
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is