What is Digg?Sponsored by Sony Pictures
Watch a scene from 2012, in theaters November 13 view!
whowillsurvive2012.com - Get ready for the biggest event in history – the end of time. How will you survive? 2012- opening 11/13
63 Comments
- GrandmasterB, on 06/21/2008, -4/+37If a bird flies into a wind turbine...that's natural selection. Survival of the fittest.
- davidryal, on 06/21/2008, -0/+22i want one of those so bad. it's like art that pays you for letting it sit near/on your house.
- DimensionalPunk, on 06/21/2008, -0/+15Didn't Kevin Costner have one of those things on his boat in Waterworld?
- MrDo, on 06/21/2008, -4/+18I just made my own micro wind.
- MindTrigger, on 06/22/2008, -0/+11You don't get to Zing your own comment, bud.
- griff36, on 06/22/2008, -0/+11clean windows kill more birds a year than windmills
- londubh, on 06/22/2008, -0/+10VAWT's can only harvest about 60% the amount of energy a HAWT can. Google it.But it can collect it over a wider range of wind speeds. So most wind energy will be collected via HAWT but the VAWT's can be used in a lot of other places that the HAWT can't. So yes VAWT's are better suited for some micro wind applications.
- elnerdo, on 06/22/2008, -1/+11The vertical ones are more efficient ONLY per square foot of space used, but that's just because their axis is horizontal, not vertical. The horizontal axis ones are more efficient per dollar, and more efficient per material used.
- bar10dr, on 06/21/2008, -0/+8Science fiction is always one step ahead
- Hrodrik, on 06/21/2008, -0/+7Another good alternative.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9945005-54.html - cfrog7, on 06/22/2008, -0/+7These have been around for a time but they're definitely getting better, more affordable, more efficient, and safer.
The most promising company I've seen is Quiet Revolution in the UK
http://quietrevolution.co.uk/ - kieranmaine, on 06/22/2008, -1/+7Why is it every positive comment is always followed by a negative comment - but one that doesn't actually try and discuss or debate the negative aspects of wind power. JettaMan - Tell us why it's a energy scam.
- MeredithM, on 06/21/2008, -3/+9a personal wind turbine that doesn't harm birds? sign me up!
- iharbinger, on 06/22/2008, -1/+7why did someone digg you down for that? Perfectly good statement.
- indian24, on 06/21/2008, -2/+7Alternative energy FTW
- ReidFleming, on 06/21/2008, -0/+5The quality ones are still expensive (prohibitively so for most of us) but as demand broadens, I'm sure we'll see prices drop. Maybe, one day, the sight of them on U.S. houses will be as ubiquitous as the solar water warmers on the rooftops of southern Europe.
- Ramble, on 06/21/2008, -2/+7What? These have existed for years and years. They're nothing new.
- areohbe, on 06/21/2008, -0/+5these have been around forever... we have a farmer down the road with one made of 40 gallon barrel halves... he's had it for at least 22 years
- dpl_, on 06/22/2008, -0/+5Vertical axis turbines aren't going to be replacing horizontal axis turbines anytime soon when it comes to large scale power generation because they are definitely less efficient. The real advantage with verticals would be for small-scale personal use in urban environments.
- elnerdo, on 06/22/2008, -0/+4... I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but that's an awful idea. The equipment to store the hydrogen and do the electrolysis would cost more money than they would ever get from using that system. Past that, despite what 'cool' and 'green' magazines have told you, hydrogen's not really a very good way to store energy, especially on a large scale. It would make more sense to just pump water up a hill with the extra electricity (allowing it to run back down through a turbine when needed), but even that would be prohibitively expensive and not-very-useful.
- SpeedSteamBoat, on 06/22/2008, -1/+4Care to explain how you can divine the efficiency of a wind turbine through casual observation from a distance?
- cap11235, on 06/21/2008, -1/+4Why? Do you not like poultry?
- FDenD, on 06/22/2008, -0/+3I'll take any renewal energy that's good for the environment.
- MudMan69, on 06/22/2008, -1/+4I'm sure it has something to do with socialism. It always does with him.
- TwinTurboMike, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2Im just going to install a merry-go-round in my front yard and invite all the neighbor kids over to play. There's more energy stored in a dozen 9 year olds than...
- happyseamonster, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2I read on Jizmodo that if there are too many windmills, it could reverse the spin of the earth.
- endlessoul, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2Yeah, that's what I was going to say.
Zinging is done by someone replying only.
That's like giving yourself a pat on the back, man. - SpyDerMann, on 06/22/2008, -1/+3I think that the article is about better and more efficient designs rather than the basic "vertical axis" concept. Just like 2008 extreme sport bikes are much better and more resistant than the ones made at the beginning of the 20th century.
- kieranmaine, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2These do look pretty good, but the price of them seems prohibitive. Maybe the larger models they're designing will cut down costs.
- Berkana, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2The linked turbine is a savonius/darrieus hybrid. I prefer a helical savonius configuration for micro wind:
http://www.helixwind.com/en/
http://www.windside.com/
The savonius turbine portion is self starting, and produces less noise than the darrieus vertical axis wind turbine. Making the turbine helical ensures a very stable torque curve. - Tarnum, on 06/22/2008, -1/+3They have better MTBF too, because of the fewer moving parts, in some cases just one rotor/turbine. I guess you can run them for years with very little maintenance, like the water turbines.
- chall2001, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2While I agree that a vertical turbine is better than nothing the author incorrectly implies that its more efficient than horizontal types. All the testing clearly shows the horizontals have significantly higher power. Why do you think all the major commercial installs use HAWT?
Also, there hasn't been any conclusive test that a VAWT is any less dangerous to birds than a HAWT of equal power. - Rylinkus, on 06/22/2008, -0/+2I don't mean to be argumentative, but everything I've read has said the opposite. That the efficiency of horizontal windmills are nearly double that of vertical options. Mostly due to power generation being more a high RPM process and VAWTS simply have a low TSR. Now, of course both are getting better. And the VAWTs tend to be more bird friendly. But alot of the VAWT advantages that end up being listed almost seem like they're simply fabricated. Seems like a lot of companies advertise them as "new and more efficient" than traditional windmills. When they've been around for years.
- nightwing2000, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1What's needed is an efficient way to store energy - hareest for future use. Batteries are not quite there yet. Various batteries have assorted technical drawbacks.
My ideal design is a superconducting ring - pump energy in as it is generated, extract as needed. The main drawback - your liquid nitrogen evaporates or you forget to fill it, and poof - a megawatt returns to the environment in an instant as the ring stops superconducting...
Lower tech solutons include:
creating hydrogen - a fuel cell would be a nice energy recovery extractor. You need a big pressure tank!
Alternatively, use the pressure tank for compressed air? How efficient?
Carbon fiber or kevlar flywheels with magnetic bearings in a vacuum container (Energy is proportional to rotational velocity squared, so choose tolerance for high speed over mass)
if the logistics permit, even pumping water up into an old water tank would be low tech but useful.
If you have the generating capacity to waste, even an inefficient solution would work. Once the capital costs are spent, any energy that can be produced is simply a freebie.
The nice thing about vertical turbines is that the axis can be secured with guy wires, meaning the structure itself does not need to be as rigid and self-supporting. The forces on a turnable horizontal-axis windmill would be substantial, so that centre post must be pretty solid - and cannot have angled supports if the blade axis can rotate any direction. - inactive, on 06/27/2008, -0/+1Also found a link to another vertical wind turbine from another person's digg submission;
http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1112/86/ - kieranmaine, on 06/24/2008, -0/+1I think I amply proved your claim that these "costly" solar panels can "barely output enough energy to run a refrigerator" is incorrect. I wasn't debating the government subsidy - I've already clarified my position on subsidies.
With regarding nuclear power expertise I was talking about what I know of the UK. Most of our nuclear reactors will be built by the French, because the UK doesn't have the expertise. If I'm wrong on that I'll be more than happy to know. - britoca, on 06/23/2008, -0/+1bird killer
- someguy92, on 06/22/2008, -2/+3RTFA
"Other advantages of vertical-axis turbines:
* Can produce up to 50% more electricity per year than conventional turbines with the same swept area
* Generate electricity at much lower wind speeds, as low as 4 mph (1.5 m/s)
* Will continue to generate power in high wind speeds, up to 130 mph (60m/s) depending on the mode
* Direct-drive units have no gearbox. No gearbox means a more efficient transfer of energy and no leaking oil
* Will not harm wildlife, in terms of bird and bat strikes" - imightbewrong, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1i saw a show on the science channel about some guy who invented a wind mill like these ones except it was used sideways
- carlosos, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1Awesome, I always thought that there should be more than 24 hours in a day. We just have to watch out that we don't install too many or otherwise the days might get shorter again...
- lostlyrics, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1http://www.solarserver.de/lexikon/aufwindkraftwerk ...
in africa you find a ruin, decades old ...
when the men in black with cases full
of 'aid' corrupted the wrong black men.
and the patent jungle is not really helpful either
http://www.patent-de.com/20040219/DE10234568A1.htm ... - kaffeinekiwi, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1Pump water uphill with surplus power, to a dam. Regenerate the power with the hydro dam as needed. Inefficient, but low tech, and has been in use for a while. Unfortunately you need the right geography.
- woodrail, on 06/22/2008, -0/+1flywheels
generator/motor rotor on magnetic bearings in a vacuum spinning at 20000 rpm or something. Very efficient.
Not good for vehicles I understand, but superawesome otherwise.
edit: oops, neverrrmind - kieranmaine, on 06/23/2008, -1/+1I've looked at the amount of energy a fridge/freezer uses. This one (http://www.comet.co.uk/shopcomet/product/385700/HO ... uses 321 kWh/year, although it is A graded for energy efficiency. This wikipedia page - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_water_heating#E ... - quotes a Belgian study, which says a solar water heating system costing 4500 euro will save the equivalent of 1875 kWh, against a "regular" electric boiler. This suggests that the energy saved by one of these systems is more than enough to run a few fridge/freezer. The payback for a system is estimated at 11.5 years including the government subsidy.
Wikipedia goes on to say that in Australia an "average" system costing "between $1,800 and $2,800" will generate "yearly electricity savings are between $300 and $700". Not using this solution in warm countries seems stupid, while even European countries can benefit.
Even if a massive program to build a large number of nuclear and hydro power stations was undertaken today, there isn't enough expertise or resources to meet all the energy demands of the world. The above solution could contribute significantly to saving money for consumers and cutting emissions, especially with the ever increasing cost of energy. - pentalive, on 06/23/2008, -0/+0Yes, but the best you can do is break even. If your home uses 200kw/h and you generate 400kw/h you get free electricity but you give the other 200 kw/h to the utility free.
Most people shoot for replacing 80% of their normal usage. - JettaMan, on 06/24/2008, -1/+1Ah yes, the government subsidy - you'll noticed I pointed that out two posts ago.
And not enough expertise for nuclear power plants?! You know not what you say. - pentalive, on 06/23/2008, -0/+0Anything to store the extra energy we all would create.
My brother in law has a PV array in his back yard, he has a huge back yard and could probably easily double the size of the array - but why spend the money? Getting 'PG&E' to pay for every Kilowatt/hour you create and storing the energy for later use is the point.
If the utility did make hydrogen we could use it in our fuelcell cars.. - icatchthewind, on 01/04/2009, -0/+0You've got to be kidding me! Thanks, I needed a good laugh today.
- JettaMan, on 06/22/2008, -1/+1Because hydro dams and nuclear power produce energy FAR cheaper than those turbines. They are way too costly for the amount of energy they produce. Have you ever even walked up to one before? It's like a battle ship tipped on its side. Not efficient, not economical - in fact downright wasteful to produce. In a true free market setting they can not compete with other forms of energy. They rely on heavy subsidies from taxpayers extracted by lobbying, which is completely screwed up.
-
Show 51 - 64 of 64 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is