What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
Killer Gift For A Movie Buff view!
bestbuy.com - Insignia Blu-ray player instantly streams Netflix movies right to your TV & comes with a free disc.
58 Comments
- inactive, on 10/01/2009, -0/+36JURASSIC PARK HERE WE COME
- TheVirus, on 10/01/2009, -5/+315065 years old , m i rite creationists?
- jmones, on 10/01/2009, -2/+28Jesus put it there to test your faith, heathen.
- socialzero, on 10/01/2009, -2/+20And that's how Easter was started.
- doublefelix, on 10/01/2009, -1/+16Better make sure them aren't Dragon eggs.
- inajeep, on 10/01/2009, -0/+14Funny yoke.
- Fleagleman, on 10/01/2009, -1/+14That's odd. Just yesterday, I found an old box of Dinasour Eggs candy in my desk drawer.
- Irco, on 10/01/2009, -1/+14are you ***** kidding me?
here, let me make it easier for you: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Geochronology&l=1 - jebsilver, on 10/01/2009, -2/+14The real question is: Were any dinosaurs found nearby wearing saddles?
- EddiePotato, on 10/01/2009, -0/+10You've uncovered a treasure trove from the Delicious Era!
- orangester, on 10/01/2009, -1/+11They're not dinosaur eggs, they're the first Easter eggs.
/s - zantos420, on 10/01/2009, -0/+9Dr. Ian Malcolm: God creates dinosaurs. God destroys dinosaurs. God creates man. Man destroys God. Man creates dinosaurs...
- EddiePotato, on 10/01/2009, -2/+11What proof do we have that India exists, other than some "photos" and "movies" and a handful of tourists claiming to be "from India"? People are so easily fooled by the global communist-atheist agenda.
- Sherman901, on 10/01/2009, -1/+9Crack it open! Let's see what's inside!
- RagManX, on 10/01/2009, -2/+10Nah. They just deny, deny, deny. These alleged eggs are allegedly numbering in the alleged hundreds and were allegedly found in the alleged country of "India" and allegedly are around 65 million years old. But it's all alleged, because the earth is only 6,000 years old, India isn't really a country, and eggs and allegedly delicious.
Or something like that. I get confused when I go too far into the young-earth creationist thought process. - Propethic, on 10/01/2009, -1/+924 is the highest number!
- willanthony, on 10/01/2009, -1/+9it seems that being a leper may have started to rot your brain too. :( come on.. i knew the god conversation would start on here.. but so soon?
- BrownieMix, on 10/01/2009, -0/+8The title was misleading. I thought they were recently laid eggs by living dinosaurs. *sigh* a boy can dream...
- zantos420, on 10/01/2009, -0/+7Dr. Ellie Sattler: Dinosaurs eat man. Woman inherits the earth...
- Cannonballkid, on 10/01/2009, -0/+6Dino D-N-A
- willanthony, on 10/01/2009, -0/+6too late some boob already said it a few comments earlier.:(
- inactive, on 10/01/2009, -1/+6Could it be because "god" a thing that no one can see, therefore, no one can *disprove* it? For a certainty, since no one was there no one could *prove* it. Could it be that the uncertainty that is guaranteed to result from using such an extraneous reference is just what is needed to close the gap between "proving" something and "saying that something has been proved"? The principles of propaganda are in play.
- sgyoung, on 10/01/2009, -0/+5OM NOM NOM
- inactive, on 10/01/2009, -2/+7How the ***** else did Jesus ride a Brontosaurs to Carpentry school you fools?
- Cannonballkid, on 10/01/2009, -1/+6SHUT THE ***** UP
- willrs, on 10/01/2009, -0/+5...profit?
- JoeCool1986, on 10/01/2009, -1/+5NO! DID WE LEARN NOTHING FROM ALIENS???
- ophello, on 10/01/2009, -1/+5If you have something EMBEDDED IN ROCK, and you KNOW HOW OLD THE ROCK IS, YOU KNOW HOW OLD THE THING EMBEDDED IN IT WAS.
- Zelzad, on 10/01/2009, -5/+8Creationists most be saying "*****, what do we say now!"
- SisyphusFragmnt, on 10/02/2009, -0/+3"I'm a crazed leper who feeds off of trolltastic comments! Bury me now so I can feed my persecution complex!"
Here, have a bite. - inactive, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3http://unixsystem.ytmnd.com/
- EddiePotato, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3This was the last entry in a journal found during a search of the area for some scientists who've gone missing.
- Renian, on 10/01/2009, -3/+6No they aren't. Creationists don't think carbon dating methods are accurate. That's the only card they have to play here.
- Walled, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3Which came first, the chicken or the egg?
- BadseedJR, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3You totally just submitted that wikipedia page right now to make him look bad. You're part of the propagandists, aren't you?
- Shuk, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3Someone call Jeff Goldblum!
- Coven, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3ah Mr. Show how I miss thee so
- PapaPanda512, on 10/01/2009, -0/+3Dave Chappelle had some in his house but I think he used it for breakfast.
- EddiePotato, on 10/01/2009, -0/+2Who are you, Forest Gump?
- EddiePotato, on 10/01/2009, -0/+2Triangle man hates person man.
- LomasLou, on 10/02/2009, -0/+2... and the team of geologists were simply eggstatic.
- fuzzy889, on 10/02/2009, -1/+3We can say with absolute certainty that the earth is several billion years old. Creationists believe it's a few thousand. There is just no way to properly express how stupid that is, so we've settled for ridiculing them for all eternity.
- keviiii, on 10/01/2009, -0/+2And sprinkled diamonds on it. Makes his dookie twinkle, mang.
- mysticalone, on 10/02/2009, -2/+4Jesus always knew where to hide the eggs real good.
- ophello, on 10/01/2009, -0/+1Well shiiiit....fire up the skillet.
- Uaedaien, on 10/01/2009, -0/+1Jurassic Park, Thank you come again.
- ratava911, on 10/01/2009, -0/+1mmm yummy you guys..
- stuffradio, on 10/01/2009, -0/+1Money eats woman, Money profits and Money wins!
- mikemehak, on 10/01/2009, -1/+2carbon dating wouldn't even be used to date that. That's why it's funny they always bring this up.
They would use radiometric dating. - tacojohn48, on 10/02/2009, -0/+1But I thought all the dinosaurs were female.
-
Show 51 - 62 of 62 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is