6 Comments
- shoc, on 11/24/2008, -0/+2most worthless gadget if i've heard of one.
NEWSFLASH: water shortages occur in areas of low humidity making this thing worthless. - aereaus, on 11/24/2008, -0/+2Oh well....
It also costs 800£. Don't think Africa will have many of these anytime soon. - clipeuh, on 11/25/2008, -0/+1I don't need that gadget, I'm a fish.
- lovemorgul, on 11/24/2008, -0/+1A steam cleaner holds water in a tank where it is heated to make pressurised steam
- Oozinator, on 11/24/2008, -0/+1There are problems with clean drinking water in many tropical regions. The real question is whether they can get the cost down such that it makes more sense than alternatives (and whether areas that would need it tend to have sufficient power infrastructure).
- marianol, on 11/24/2008, -0/+0As shoc said, is the most useless gadget I've ever heard, and also very misleading... And this is what I hate about this news..
"the machine uses the same amount of electricity as three light bulbs." great comparison!! which bulbs the 4W ones on my car the 100W on the living room or the 1000W of the football field, and other thing how much water it generates with that energy...



What is Digg?
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the