What is Digg?Sponsored by Best Buy
Meet Jarice: Next star of Best Buy’s holiday campaign. view!
youtube.com/bestbuy0 - Employee Jarice Brodie shares his story, his excitement and his singing voice.
418 Comments
- Roads01, on 11/11/2007, -14/+291What's up with that sound effect? Very Annoying.
- inactive, on 10/18/2007, -13/+200Great video...We need a clear, new policy that is, "America will remain steadfast to the Constitution and free. No terrorist will ever change that."
We do not need our current policy of, "We create new laws that infringe upon your rights, and limit your freedoms." - diggggggggggg, on 10/22/2007, -2/+116Without the ridiculous editing:
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky2t_tDsZrk
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-D1jCZ31Uw - mishsquish, on 11/11/2007, -8/+119Ok, what the **** is the deal with the unnecessary sounds and stupid sum-up titles that basically act as subtitles across the whole screen?
You get an A+ in material. You get a Z- for how you presented it. - ButterBuddha, on 10/17/2007, -2/+96"If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world, ahhh nation building missions, we're going to have a serious problem down the road" - W during the 2000 debate
- Shigatsu, on 10/25/2007, -21/+112We can't give up now. Make noise people. The more noise made, the higher the chance we bring these ***** down. I hope this hits front page, it could use some publicity and dialog.
- ZenMojo, on 11/02/2007, -3/+76People ignore me when I say this, but I have to repeat it in every discussion of Bush's pre-9/11 plans. I was up at 4 am watching C-SPAN a couple of years ago and it was an October 2000 debate between Bush and Gore. When they asked about a solution to our energy problems, Bush said, "One of the problems we have to deal with is our dependence on Middle Eastern oil. Dictators like Saddam Hussein sit on our oil and we have to solve that problem." He later suggested drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and ANWR, but pay attention...he said that a solution to our energy problems in the future was removing Saddam Hussein. He said this BEFORE the Election Night 2000. Think about it.
- exomni, on 10/17/2007, -17/+87The Bush administration is sickening. The more you look at it, the more any reasonable person must hate America.
- rephil513, on 10/18/2007, -19/+888 Years of (Bush Sr.) Reagan + 4 years of Bush Sr. + 8 Years of WJ Clinton + 8 years of Bush Jr. = The F'd up America of today. But I'm sure Hillary can fix it though, after all, she does have a vagina.... /sarcasm. The country doesn't need a total of 32+ years of Bush/Clinton Dynastic Rule, so...
RP 08 - noahhoward, on 10/22/2007, -1/+67Start voting for people based on merit rather than party affiliation and soundbytes then,
- BillDoE, on 10/17/2007, -14/+77Great job with cheesy tilting and bad sound effects...NOT
- dheaddy, on 10/17/2007, -5/+62Again I'm astonished at the apathy of the American people when it comes to Bush and his actions. I mean no offence to any Americans here, but it's something that has truly baffled me.
I just think that if Bush came out tomorrow and said to the nation, "Yup, I lied about the war on Iraq. I just never liked that Saddam guy and it was all about the oil really. Also, I shoot kittens in my back yard for fun, and there's nothing you can do about it! Good night and God bless"
that nothing would change. Surely presidents have been impeached for lesser crimes? - kaelyiesta, on 10/16/2007, -2/+56Anyone that already knows about PNAC will find this news a bit late to the party. Still, worth watching for this mans particular specific... if you can bear the sound effects.
- Jesse, on 10/17/2007, -4/+50Holy *****, a real life "NOT" joke. In this day and age.
Thank you for making me feel 13 again. - diggggggggggg, on 11/11/2007, -3/+45Without the f..king text & sound effects:
Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ky2t_tDsZrk
Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-D1jCZ31Uw - gllopc, on 10/17/2007, -11/+51I've been thinking of voting for Clinton or Obama, believing that a minority president would be really good for America; but if Ron Paul is chosen by the GOP to run, I think the right choice would be to vote for him.
- innocentsinner, on 10/17/2007, -1/+40I thought it was pretty funny....PSYCHE!
- KnightWhoSaysNi, on 10/17/2007, -0/+32¿Que?
- fuzzynyanko, on 10/22/2007, -2/+32Thank you for posting the links. The chime and extra 'IT'S A CONSPIRACY" text was annoying. It was kinda like an "Achievement unlocked: you watched this for 2 minutes" signal or something.
- frenchkick, on 11/11/2007, -2/+32wow that turned into a ron paul video real quick
jesus im all for the guy but lets not turn every political article into something to do with ron paul - looklikecontest, on 10/18/2007, -8/+38What's the shocking revelation here? The war against Iraq was never about 9/11. First it was about "weapons of mass destruction", then it was about "freeing the Iraqi people", now it's about "staying the course". All *****, certainly, but no one ever really claimed 9/11 was the reason. Iraq never had anything to with 9/11. Even Bush said this.
The real problem is trying to figure what WAS the reason to go to war on Iraq. (Hint: There wasn't any.) - xister, on 10/17/2007, -1/+26That's "cue"...(for future reference)
- civdis24, on 10/16/2007, -1/+20I'm all for Ron Paul but the commentary and sound effects/music on this video were terrible and essentially ruined this video's integrity.
- calmeacham, on 10/17/2007, -3/+22Because voting for someone based on their gender or epidermal hue isn't dumb at all........
- Mooco, on 10/17/2007, -9/+28...Okay, this was fcking annoying. Just give me the 60 minute interview, I don't need the amateur video editing. Buried also due to inaccuracy; obviously if the whole thing got on 60 minutes at all it wasn't exactly 'buried.' Last, yes, we know this already. If you're only just now finding out, you seriously need a better news source than Digg.
- itsPinkCharms, on 10/16/2007, -2/+20Its amazing how people feel more outrage towards the bad editing job instead of feeling outrage because the public was lied too... Just another sign of the times... Screw what they said I'm not pissed about that. I'm pissed about the bad editing...
- eplawless, on 10/15/2007, -3/+19Not jokes? ...really?
- Garmonbozzia, on 10/22/2007, -4/+18Agreed. It made me turn it off. What, like I'm some mouth breathing simpleton that can't stay focused long enough to watch your video? No digg for you.
- eplawless, on 10/16/2007, -10/+23That's nice, but not relevant to the fact that the US' motives were lied about and that we were deliberately misled from the beginning.
- tyywebb, on 10/18/2007, -0/+13dee da doo dongggggg!!!
- HigherLogic, on 10/16/2007, -9/+21What was terribly wrong with Clinton's 8-year run?
- enginbeering, on 10/17/2007, -1/+13Just so you know, women aren't a minority.
- tehxen3, on 10/17/2007, -13/+25Clinton supported the same thing, get a clue.
- noahhoward, on 10/17/2007, -10/+21No really? You think? Of course Bush was planing a war with Iraq, Clinton made regime change in Iraq national policy (Iraq Liberation Act). You don't attack some place without a plan, I just wish they had used the plan the Clinton admin already had.
- youareretarded, on 10/16/2007, -1/+12I like RP and I thought that was annoying and unnecessary as well.
- inactive, on 10/17/2007, -1/+11Compared to everyone he's running against... he pretty much is :P
- cphelps, on 10/16/2007, -0/+10That was my favorite part. What a crock of *****.
- Steviebe21, on 10/16/2007, -7/+16Great video...until the last minute where it turns into blatant Ron Paul spam.
- weaksnyc, on 08/14/2009, -8/+17"Abolish Federal Systems" is what turns me off about Ron Paul. I've yet to get an explanation as to how this could possibly be a good idea. I've come to the conclusion that the reason for this is simple... the majority of the people cheering for Ron Paul have no idea what this means or even how it could be achieved. And that's not meant to be an insult, either. Without some serious academic credentials, there is no possible way the general public could know the intricacies of all the major federal systems in place, which also means they could not possible realize the consequences of removing them.
That said, It's uplifting to see so many people get behind a "small-government" candidate, who is actually attempting to be fiscally responsible. I just have a problem with how radical the proposed changes are, and how little most of the supporters know about them.
It's just not enough for me to see a video that says "Abolish Federal Systems = Saves money." No federal reserve? Really? PLEASE explain how this could work, because I'll be the first to get in line behind you if you can. These systems were put into place to fix things that weren't working. Maybe some of these systems are no longer doing their job, I agree with that. But that doesn't mean remove the system... it means fix it. - inactive, on 10/16/2007, -9/+18S was secular AND we put him into power. How about we mind our own business and help out our own populace?
- pheyze, on 10/16/2007, -0/+8I was beyond amazed when I heard that, the things he's been allowed to do is almost sickening.
- Louie510, on 10/16/2007, -1/+9Saddam was NOT a threat. 1 the US CIA backed Saddam for many years, and 2 due to sanctions after the 1st Gulf War(which there were few US casualties) Saddam was unable to rebuild his armed forces. That's the reason why it only took 2 weeks to topple Saddams defenses and the Iraqi government. Biggest threat indeed.
- noahhoward, on 10/17/2007, -9/+17God's law is what is ***** us up in the first place. Tell your god to quit talking to Bushie and his friends.
- cphelps, on 10/17/2007, -3/+11That proof you provide to show that Saddam was behind 9/11 is utterly amazing I must admit.
/sarcasm - Memitim, on 10/16/2007, -2/+9Yeah, I'm a Paul supporter but I think that "minimize" would be a much better word. Government is a necessary evil, and as such should only be used when absolutely necessary and to the minimum extent possible.
- AllenAllen, on 10/16/2007, -4/+11Not to pile on HUK but no, that simply wasn't the fact. But even if it was. Most have the crazy idea that we're in Iraq to get the bastards that caused 911. THAT is the point. You are talking about something entirely different. We are talking about a President who took advantage of people's fear and having Cheney push the Al Quida connection on the ignorant. Officers in Iraq show the burning twin towers to their troops as "inspiration." The CRAZY think is that Al Quida HATED the Bath Party and had even tried to assasinate key people in Sadam's government! But as to your (what I see unrealted) Point:
The first gulf war decimated his army. There was a "no fly zone" bisecting Iraq. The country was forced to allow inspectors, even in Sadam's palaces. They were defeated militarily and recall that this was after their long, long war with Iraq. That story that people are telling you, is non-nonsensical. That still leaves "secret" WMD programs. If you talked to people at the highest levels at that time, they too would have repeated the same fears. However, what we're now discovering is that it appears (I certainly can't prove) that that was made up by a small circle of folks at the top. They took studies that said "it is possible (anything is possible)" and told key Senators and others it WAS. Their main source, if I have this right, was code named "curveball" and he turned out to be someone who knew that if he kept telling THEM what they wanted to hear, the money would keep coming in. Recently, senators described private meetings where they were shown photos of drone planes the "could" carry nukes from a program that Sadam "could" have. That scared the senators into voting certain ways... problem is.... Sadam had no such facilities in drones or of course nukes... the photos? Photos of OUR drones. Google that stuff and you'll find quotes and you can even write the senators involved. Check it out. It was all PUSHED by Cheney/Rummy for purposes we as outsiders can only speculate on.
My perhaps totally wrong assessment is this: I think the problem of Sadam's threat to start a spot oil market in Euros currency and the courting by the French (who stuck with Sadam if you recall) for a scarce resource was key. There is always the fear over oil getting tied up in competing markets -- the big fear is China. We need to lock it up and if we can't do that, we need to keep it from competitors. - yodinosaur, on 11/11/2007, -0/+7dugg for use of "Z-"
- IHaveIssues, on 10/16/2007, -3/+10Watch "Power of Nightmares" : http://video.google.ca/videosearch?q=power+of+nigh ...
The documentary is also all over bittorrent. - inactive, on 10/17/2007, -6/+13Ron Paul Ron Paul.....(Cheerleaders Jump) ....Ron Paul (Cameras Flash) ,,,,,,,,,Bang....
-
Show 51 - 100 of 422 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is