6 Comments
- felinonymous, on 04/25/2008, -1/+7Great job guys! You were calm and sounded knowledgeable about your subject matter. The host was equally knowledgeable and obviously willing to let you have your say. Hang in there!
- crystalblue69, on 04/25/2008, -0/+4enturbulation.org
- EvanVolm, on 04/25/2008, -0/+3It almost sounded like the host favored Anonymous a bit. Excellent interview. That lawyer obviously hasn't seen V for Vendetta....
- Plupsyeah, on 04/25/2008, -0/+2Great work, Gregg and "Tom". You did really well. The lawyer kept on going on about entering a CHURCH! (God forbid). The rest of the religious world makes a distinction between church offices and a sanctuary/church. The CoS doesn't have a sanctuary or sacred place where services of worship take place. You were going into a foyer, I presume. Make sure that's clear.
Also, "Tom" - I really thought you did well in articulating goals to do with accountability, truth and morality. Excellent. - CommodoreRimjob, on 04/28/2008, -0/+2This is delicious. WGBH is highly respected among media outlets. This kind of exposure is exactly what is needed.
Expose the flimsy arguments of the payroll lawyers! Any judge worth his ***** would throw this out of court. Protesting =! Legal Harassment. - CommodoreRimjob, on 04/28/2008, -0/+1The lawyer obviously hasn't done his homework outside of what the CoS has fed him. Prior Bad Acts is quite the legal fauxpas in cases like these.
ZOMG! HE STOLE MP3s! FELOOOOOON! Makes the lawyer look like the raging prick he is.
With the least competent judge hearing these arguments the case will in most likelihood be eventually dismissed. Exercising one's constitutionally protected right to protest an organization does not constitute legal harassment of said ORG.


What is Digg?