What is Digg?67 Comments
- rhustang, on 10/12/2007, -0/+38lotsa nudity, fyi:
http://www.crazyrussian.com/02/entry_1872.php - tw0k1ngs, on 10/12/2007, -2/+38Damn liberal babies, being born all naked and free-spirited. Put some damn clothes on.
- Leonichol, on 10/12/2007, -3/+22That's no baby. Churchill is back! 5x as angry. 10x as fat.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+11This one is working:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/gallery/2005/12/29/GA2005122900888_index_frames.htm?startat=1 - dominasian, on 10/12/2007, -15/+24anyone else disturbed by the giant nude baby
- OneManArmy, on 10/12/2007, -9/+17It is just a sculpture of a just-born baby. What does being nude have to do with anything?. So you think all the people that visited the museum and the artist are pedophiles !!!
- eliah, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7Babies are creepy.
- Shneebly, on 10/12/2007, -0/+7I've noticed a pattern with front-page digg stories...they all have to do with INCREDIBLE, AMAZING, or MIND BLOWING renderings of things that are extremely life-like...except are not real.
- CompIsMyRx, on 10/12/2007, -1/+8Wow. That's all I can say really. I seriously thought the two old women were real until I saw the perspective shot with the real people at the exhibit. Also, the just born baby still attached to the mother is just plain weird.
- Henley24, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=RON+MUECK+&btnG=Google+Search
his name is Ron Mueck, lots of images out there - baraqiyal, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Why is it that every time someone asks why so-and-so is being dugg down, they're actually well into the positives?
- Ngai, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4THAT!!! is art :) Its really good :)
- SSCrow, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I'm kind of sick of people using all caps adjectives in front of their Digg articles,
like, AMAZING pictures, HILARIOUS Ads, ASTOUNDING discoveries, EPIC Struggles, and so on. - Boofster, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5INCREDIBLE the site is down.
- dragazis, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I have actually seen these. There was just a recent exhibit of his works at the Brooklyn Museum. They really are something. I personally love the women in bed and the poor guy sitting on the chair. When you see the baby up-close you really can't phathom all the work and detail involved. Looking close at it you see all sorts of different skin pigamentations as if they were real.
For those interested about the exhibit which also contains behind the scenes info (pictures and video)... http://www.brooklynmuseum.org/exhibitions/ron_mueck/ - liah, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3I remember his art being displayed (specifically the big, slightly obese nude man sitting in the corner) in my tiny hometown of Grimsby, Ontario, a few years back. His work in person is phenomenal.
- laplacian, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4Don't be silly. when's the last time diggmirror actually caught anything?
- davecor, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Anomalya, you are missing just how subtle and brilliant his plan is. His entire career was calculated to disgust you - YOU personally! Not only that, he tricked you into exposing your poor command of the English language.
It's "than", not "then".
"then" describes time. "than" describes comparison.
Ron Mueck is in Australia right now.... laughing at you. Just YOU Anomalya! Did you know that there is in fact, an international plot against you? - mindsnare, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Seen these a few times now and they are just incredible. I love how nothing is the normal size, they are are all over or undersize, yet still amazingly realistic. I'd love to go see this exhibition some day.
- foomojive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2NSFW
- BZKyle, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3They all kinda look like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/63056612@N00/18442995/in/set-435552/ - pkobayashi, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Here's a nice video showing the construction of the Pregnant Woman,
http://blip.tv/file/94203 - Xinareiaz, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2not working for me...and the images are dead.
- Hypersapien, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2The fat guy was on the cover of a recent issue of Discover Magazine. I thought it was a real guy until now.
- prowdtobebrown, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2who do i talk to about this guarantee?
- geoffreyireland, on 10/12/2007, -1/+3http://supertouchblog.com/uploaded_images/2006/11/289574309_3276521b71.jpg
Nice ass. - imsoclever, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2grow up
- rheaume, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1You can talk directly to KEVIN ROSE's HDR UBUNTU complaint dpt.
- LocalH, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@AkatsukiNoTobi:
It was a female infant, seeing as the title of the sculpture is "A Girl". So, no, he wouldn't have sculpted the penis. - crashingstar, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Reminds me of Duane Hanson.
- ROFLance, on 10/12/2007, -3/+4Why is rhustang getting dugg down? That page has a lot of pictures, and many different angles of the sculptures.
- hokeywebb22, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Those sculptures were amazing.
For some reason my favorite was the guys face lying down. - davecor, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Double your money back if not blown away!
- 72Devilz, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Showed my wife a closeup of the two old ladies and asked her if she thought they were real, she said well Duh! of course. Very impressive work, some talents are locked deep within just waiting to be found.
Wow, just WOW! - AndrewDB, on 01/10/2008, -1/+2One of the pregnant woman with the kid on her stomach.. the woman has a face like 'What the ***** did I just give birth to?'
The little old ladies looked damn near real.. too. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1wow
- Yusouf, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I AGREE!
- fatlip, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1bah, i remember when getting blown away was a bad thing
- konklarii, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1I saw his show yesterday in Ottawa. It's incredible work, close up. They're hyper realistic, but imperfect. They've got pores and warts and stray hairs, and they're so weirdly real you almost feel a little guilty for staring at them.
- gabrielg01, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1creepy
- rheaume, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Please register yourself right away
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Is that Jesus?!
That'd be very cool to see the one of the woman under the sheet in person, along with all of them actually. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1IS IT art at all?
- rcfan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0It´s AWESOME how the digg effect occurs everytime i click a link ...
- AdamsS7, on 10/24/2007, -0/+0super figures.. here some others:
http://www.weather.com/search/partner?Keywords=%22 ...
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newssearch.php?key ...
http://www.weather.com/search/partner?Keywords=%22 ...
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newssearch.php?key ...
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/newssearch.php?key ... - SebG, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1This is unreal
- govertime, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0more here
http://digg.com/design/Larger_Than_Life_Sculptures_-_Two-stories_High_and_Hyper-Realistic - rsunde, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0or STUPID comments...
- ifonly, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1http://www.duggmirror.com
- mrblaq, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0THE 80S CALLED, THEY WANT THEIR HAIR BACK
-
Show 51 - 63 of 63 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 