What is Digg?27 Comments
- texxmexx, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Anyone that has designed webpages may find this interesting. It sure shows how many poorly coded pages are out there!
- lobsterboy1980, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2i enjoy the repeated mentions of Microsoft Office's creative "HTML" output
- csimpkins, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1"The soft attribute doesn't appear to be supported by any modern browsers. We couldn't find any formal documentation for it; presumably it is an obsolete Netscape feature."
You're friggin GOOGLE! You couldn't FIND something about the web ON the web? heh.
Anyway, very interesting study! - paulmetzger, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3when coding a new page, i tend to have one div that serves as a "wrapper" for all of the content. I usually go with the id "tupac", or sometimes "dre"
:) - stimpack, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1"Note: You will need a browser with SVG and CSS support to view the result graphs correctly. We recommend Firefox 1.5.". dugg, just for that, ah crap I'm a fanboy.
- microlog, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Why even care about if a story is "stolen" from antoher site? Thats just like comparing two different news channels, yes they steal from each other but who cares. I mean isn't that better that more people can read about the stor? I prefer reading news like at digg cuz its much nicer design :D
- rndmculture, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1What the heck would you actually use this data for? Someone please give me an example...
- noamsml, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0"when coding a new page, i tend to have one div that serves as a "wrapper" for all of the content. I usually go with the id "tupac", or sometimes "dre"
:)"
Seen lots of that, I don't get why. It doesn't make sense semantically (that's what body is for), and neither does it make sense presentationally (you can style both html and body tags, which can substitute for the common body and div#wrapper [in that order]). - bloodroot, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Wow, an analysis of a billion poorly coded pages. How enlightening.
- area17, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Why should I listen to Google about how to design my sites? All their sites look like *****
indeed..
http://www.accu-tototaal.nl/nokia_accu.html
http://www.accu-tototaal.nl/sitemap.php - madformadness, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0cool google reccomends firefox!
- Dingc, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0Good to see all webpages have a , , , and (most, look closely!) have a section.
- karch, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0isn't this kind of obvious
- jnorris441, on 10/12/2007, -3/+2Why should I listen to Google about how to design my sites? All their sites look like *****.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0This was actually posted before the Slashdot story, but nobody could be arsed to vote it up.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1If you aren't interested, go on to the next story.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0ugh, skimmed a few pages... gawdawful boring and for the most part useless info. Sure to please the googlesexuals.
- faxxy, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0Useful! This will really help me to get laid.
- TRUEPATRIOT, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0no pie charts=no digg!
also lame story.. - mogebier, on 10/12/2007, -4/+2I can't YAWN big enough about this.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+1why do articles such as this appear on digg shortly after they are posted on slashdot?
- nicodemas, on 10/12/2007, -2/+0Grand slam
- oddball, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0hey, lets just copy all the slashdot stories!!!!!!!
- rodball, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0Attention Bush administration... all you need, right here ;-)
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -3/+0cool. I wonder if I can make google notice my blog more by failing to follow any of the most common findings in that study. :)
http://blog.thetechgurus.net - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -5/+1borringgg zzzZZZzzz
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is