135 Comments
- harvested, on 03/26/2008, -1/+84So that's what I'm doing wrong, I always forget the candy for cuties
- vanityfarewell, on 03/26/2008, -1/+74Ooo Swish!!!
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -2/+75wow!!... I'm wearing the same outfit the last guy has on right now!...except my hat is made out of tinfoil......and no pants....
- woody56292, on 03/26/2008, -0/+60"one designer even went so far as to say women wouldn't be wearing dresses at all"
wow there's a forward thinker for ya. - skateboard1, on 03/26/2008, -0/+57That's what I wear when I'm out flying my car.
- Frost9999, on 03/26/2008, -1/+51Coins - check!
Keys - check!
Candy for Cuties - check! - richmessenger, on 03/26/2008, -2/+43Clothing of the future as seen on the front page of Digg last week
http://digg.com/comedy/Film_from_1930_about_fashio ... - michelsonmorley, on 03/26/2008, -0/+39"He'll be fitted with a telephone, a radio, and a container for coins and keys."
Cell phone: Check. MP3 Player: Check. Wallet: Check. Light on top of my head: Only on weekends, but check (for caving). - insomniac8400, on 03/26/2008, -0/+35The men's clothing was spot on.
- themarq, on 03/26/2008, -0/+34Funny, I didn't see anyone's thong sticking out of the top of their pants. Nor was there a single Stone Cold Steve Austin T-Shirt.
- jayb1rd, on 03/26/2008, -0/+26Don't forget candy for cuties!
- namelessXsilent, on 03/26/2008, -0/+24All im thinking of is the Conan O'Brien "in the year 2000!" skit
"Oh Swish" - richmessenger, on 03/26/2008, -0/+22They didn't predict the popped collar. No one could have
- covertress, on 03/26/2008, -0/+17digg that fanny pack
- iamclassic, on 03/26/2008, -0/+17Would someone tell me why all the 'future' clothing always has angles or points on the shoulders?
- surKaz, on 03/26/2008, -0/+16Give it time...
- BillGod, on 03/26/2008, -0/+15It's to hold "Candy for your cuties" Man that made me laugh!
- Blanchflower, on 03/26/2008, -1/+15I want a mobile phone I plug into my chest like that guy. It knocks the iPhone into a cocked electric headlight.
- sholt, on 03/26/2008, -1/+14Apparently, if that last outfit was any clue, in the 30's designers thought that we would fall into the earth's "evil twin" alternate universe.
- fl00d, on 03/26/2008, -1/+14The wedding dress looks like it is from the '80s.
- fluxion, on 03/26/2008, -1/+13in the 1930's "candy" was slang for Rohypnol
- hutectro, on 03/26/2008, -0/+12The man is missing his Condom bag for his night life
- surKaz, on 03/26/2008, -0/+10Check!
- bradleyland, on 03/26/2008, -0/+10Excuse me, it's a utility belt.
*clears throat* - fluxion, on 03/26/2008, -0/+10holy ***** man, the woman weren't all that crazy, but the guy at the end was just stupendously ridiculous
though they were right about being fitted with a telephone at least (cell phones). - GiggleStick, on 03/26/2008, -0/+9They predicted the future!
- alexpigment, on 03/26/2008, -1/+9that's how british people say it. in fact that's how british people SPELL it. and considering all the other elements that end with "ium", it seems more correct than how we Americans say it.
- bradleyland, on 03/26/2008, -0/+8You bastard.
- nmc9, on 03/26/2008, -1/+9no good man would go out of the house without candy for cuties
- HonoredMule, on 03/26/2008, -0/+7Because we've all evolved into eggheads who must use padded shoulders and similar tactics to attract women with the illusion of physical stature and strength.
- hutectro, on 03/26/2008, -0/+7You got that RIGHT
- dafragsta, on 03/26/2008, -0/+7Dugg for spiral boobs.
- lazycat, on 03/26/2008, -1/+8Honestly, I've missed that. I apologize.
- 06metzp, on 03/26/2008, -0/+7Ah, but see - *this* one wasn't from doubleviking.
- SoundJudgment, on 03/26/2008, -0/+7Your Emperor, Ming the Merciless approves this movie-reel.
- umpres, on 03/26/2008, -0/+6Wait... No sorry, definitely not catching on.
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+6The future's gonna be great!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=fp9EXg0J6jw
... or will it? - celticchrys, on 03/26/2008, -0/+6Because pointy clothing is impractical, it is rarely in style in real life. Therefore, adding such things to your design makes it unusual and different from the daily now, which is an easy way to seem futuristic.
- SomeImagination, on 03/26/2008, -2/+8Candy for Cuties, isn't that called rohypnol nowadays?
- theragu40, on 03/26/2008, -0/+6Sarcasm? I do not think that word means what you think it means...
- upikupik123, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5"electric headlight to find an honest man...."
hmm.. handy.... but the shape is ridiculous.. lol.. - celticchrys, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5ST: TNG is predicting a handful of centuries in the future from now. Other than to say that we will probably be able to have lightweight outfits that can adequately keep us warm/cool, that's hard to predict.
- gittenlucky, on 03/26/2008, -7/+12REPOST! Doesn't anyone look through the old posts before submitting?
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5how cool is that..."hair light"
- purplehaze420, on 03/26/2008, -1/+6Was this not submitted, like, last week ?
- MrErr, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5That high up hair did come true ... except it was earlier in the 1980's.
- inactive, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5Why did the man look like a suicide bomber? Coincidence or a true glimpse into the future?
- bbkingadrock, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5I love a woman in a pair of cantilevered heels.
- Twisty, on 03/26/2008, -0/+5What eva eva, we do what we want! :)
- richmessenger, on 03/26/2008, -1/+6It's not your fault Digg's dupe checker never catches this stuff. Unless you word the title and description are worded almost exactly the same it's not that effective.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 133 discussions



What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved