digg

Facebook Connect Join Digg About

Clever JPEG Optimization Techniques

smashingmagazine.com — When people talk about image optimization, they consider only the limited parameters offered by popular image editors, like the Quality slider, the number of colors

Who dugg this?

Digg DudeWhat is Digg?

Digg is a place for people to discover and share content from anywhere on the web. Digg surfaces the best stuff as submitted and voted on by the community. Take the Tour to learn more.

8 Comments

show profanity settings
expand all
  • Yarkz, on 07/02/2009, -0/+4PNG > JPG
  • KenSPT, on 07/02/2009, -0/+2I'm Digging this simply because it's not about Michael Jackson ...
  • stoanhart, on 07/02/2009, -0/+2Very well written and informative article.
  • 80hd, on 07/03/2009, -0/+1That was very nice.

    Articles that are about 'advanced technique' but only cover the bare minimum are too common so this was a fresh change ;)
  • stinky9, on 07/01/2009, -0/+1It has different colour tones but sweet result!
  • Zippo, on 07/02/2009, -0/+1Unless you're working with a large photo, don't use JPEG... or just use very little compression. We don't use dial-up anymore... no one's going to notice or care if you managed to squeeze the file down by another 10KB
  • antimatroid, on 07/02/2009, -1/+1Clever Image Optimization Techniques:
    Don't use JPEG.
  • SpikeX, on 07/01/2009, -2/+2Was I the only one that didn't notice a difference between the two Samsung microwave images?

  • Add a Comment

    Login or register to comment!
    Or, sign-in super fast with your Facebook account ...


© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content created and posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain | Terms of Use Updated | Privacy Policy
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.