What is Digg?63 Comments
- DaemonDigg, on 10/12/2007, -0/+24Except duggmirror does not cache the images. Useless.
- aywwts4, on 10/12/2007, -0/+23"WARNING: May take a long time to load since every image is contained in one page."
Who wants to bet on a record setting digg effect?
Edit: It hasnt loaded for me yet. - solvable, on 10/12/2007, -1/+21NO WAY! SERIOUSLY?
- solvable, on 10/12/2007, -1/+20We need a duggduggmirror.com
- jayhawk88, on 10/12/2007, -1/+19"WARNING: May take a long time to load since every image is contained in one page."
Translation: Watch me melt this guys web server into slag. - angusm, on 10/12/2007, -0/+18"Digg - punishing insufficiently scalable solutions since 2004."
- xxNIRVANAxx, on 10/12/2007, -1/+17diggs != page views
- blapierre, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14Yes, this has "bad idea" written all over it.
- neoncricket, on 10/12/2007, -0/+14That didn't take very long to load. I got my '404 page not found' message instantaneously.
- pcgeek101, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11Just click the little circle with a line through it next to their name. Problem solved :-)
- llbbl, on 10/12/2007, -0/+11some are NSFW so be ready to scroll quickly!
- shawnanigans, on 10/12/2007, -0/+10digg is like a plague of bandwidth locusts. We just gobble up bandwidth like delicious wheat.
- spankaccount, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6Web design like that is going to kill their web server.
- eliteeggnog, on 10/12/2007, -0/+6It sounded cool.
Digg effect is a go. - bfaulk04, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5not completely work-safe, but since it's so close to the holidays and my office is slowly becoming a ghost town... dugg and enjoyed thoroughly.
- brstilson, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6Anyone else find it ironic how the first picture is named "badidea.jpg" and how that perfectly describes the huge-number-of-pictures-on-one-page layout?
- Lijiman, on 10/12/2007, -0/+5Ya, I was afraid that would happen.
- WarpFox, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6how about http://img.4chan.org/b/imgboard.html ? thats the place where all the internet memes like longcat and the orly owl are invented.
This page is like, the kind of nonoffensive humor i wouldnt enjoy personally but would show my mother. - dclowd9901, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Indeed, number of diggs does not the amount of pageviews make, but you can get a general idea of how popular a page is by its diggs thus far. And 45 is a relatively small amount of diggers.
Incidentally, I'd really like for someone to test the correlation between # of diggs to #of pageviews on a comparative diggs/time vs. pageviews/time graph. I'd do it myself, but I don't have a webpage with enough bandwidth. - somerandomnerd, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4I suspect eugenef might be the owner of eugenef.com though.
- nataliej, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Site stats:
http://www.sitemeter.com/?a=stats&s=sm6crainium&r=6
"Average page views per day = 1500. Page view today = 7500" - Koskun, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5@Tony611, While I don't know who WarpFox is, I highly doubt 4chan is his site. Might also want to learn a bit about 4chan before you look like an idiot by saying they need advertising.
- Jofaba, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3Worst digg ever? I've been following this page all day waiting to see when I'd actually get a chance to see the pictures and every link someone puts up (thanks for trying) don't work. Grrrrr.
- WhiskerTheMad, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3And on today's edition of "How to melt down your webserver..."
- WarpFox, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2why did digg ***** up my link D:
- fugeelama, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Tasty, delicious wheat... ::drools::
- keathmilligan, on 10/12/2007, -0/+2Seriously, wtf is the point of posting a cache of the html page that just tries to load images from the original ***** site?
- Wootery, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Oops, wrong thread, burry.
- solvable, on 10/12/2007, -2/+3It doesnt,
- joshPB, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Not working.
Gah, digg effect!
Anybody else got a mirror or anything>? - eivissu, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Looks like it's back up again, although things are s-l-o-w-l-y loading. Some images aren't even being displayed.
- jgarzik, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1Does anybody have a Coral cache link, or similar?
- Tony611, on 10/12/2007, -0/+1@ Koshkun
Maybe you should look at the comment i had replied to, not just the one right above me. - jtjdt, on 10/12/2007, -1/+2Use youtube for your experiment. Youtube tracks how many people view the video. You could relate that in corelation with diggs. A lot of my friends look at the stories, but digg very very fewly.
- Raz75, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2>> May take a long time to load since every image is contained in one page.
Oh man, this server is going down.
Doh... aywwts4 beat me to it. - seventoes, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1Go is to the chicken. No quack.
- aloser, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1A find/replace on the search counts 818 images XD
Hopefully his server died before he went over his bandwidth limit.. or someone's going to have a very large bill. - ggbs, on 10/12/2007, -0/+0http://web.archive.org/web/20060118062533/http://www.crainium.net/jdjArchives/image_collection/
MIRROR - tommarley, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1my two cents: the art of monkey love http://www.productdose.com/article.php?article_id=1258
- yonnermark, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2bouncing boobs
- terrablebyte, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1http://www.crainium.net.nyud.net:8090/jdjArchives/image_collection/
- supermanksu, on 10/12/2007, -2/+2Some really good image and some really funny ones.
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+1ZOMG
- inactive, on 10/12/2007, -1/+0broken jpg!
weeeeee! - bioskope, on 10/12/2007, -2/+1hmmm makes me wonder how duggmirror holds up
- Jugalator, on 10/12/2007, -4/+1Yep, it's ***** ***** by us ***** now. :-p
- Tony611, on 10/12/2007, -5/+2Commenting on digg is not and never will be a sufficent way to advertise for your website.
- reevolutn, on 10/12/2007, -7/+3http://www.google.com/search?hs=sUq&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&q=cache%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.crainium.net%2FjdjArchives%2Fimage_collection%2F&btnG=Search
googley cache - lordthor, on 10/12/2007, -8/+4http://duggmirror.com/design/Best_of_the_best_images_on_the_web/
- hbweb500, on 10/12/2007, -10/+4Yeah, *****, though your name is offensive enough, your avatar is definitely NSFW... though your boss would have to be looking very, very closely...
-
Show 51 - 63 of 63 discussions
Check out the new & improved 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is