What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Can't get enough Dragon Age: Origins? Check out new footage. view!
DragonAge.BioWare.com - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
38 Comments
- dullnation, on 02/24/2009, -1/+27Just give it another 10 years and when IE8 is finally dead, you'll be able to use them!
- DonCarcharo, on 02/24/2009, -0/+20What's the point of showing me all the cool things that Internet Explorer won't properly support for another decade? You're trying to make me cry, aren't you?
- colincornaby, on 02/24/2009, -3/+15I wasn't aware Photoshop could do dynamic generation in real time for your web site viewers.
Unless you plan on having some guy actually do the Photoshop work every time your page is viewed, in which case you are clearly much more awesome than I thought. - colincornaby, on 02/24/2009, -0/+10Moral of the story, if you have a WebKit browser they're all supported, Firefox supports some, and IE doesn't support most these features.
- hackop, on 02/24/2009, -2/+11You can bury me, but we all know IE still won't offer support for it until years after it's officially released.
- KloroFormd, on 02/24/2009, -0/+9Screw that, I'll use what's supported now in the better browsers and have the rest fall back with an error saying your browser sucks ass.
Then again, the site I run gets little traffic. - TheWebMix, on 02/24/2009, -0/+9Very cool techniques. The features of CSS3 look like they are going to make for some great ways to achieve new effects easily with CSS. Should be exciting when it is finally released an supported.
- Phoenyx, on 02/24/2009, -1/+8"This article presents 5 CSS3 techniques which can dramatically get you a stunning user interfaces and how to achieve almost the same effects using jQuery for browsers that are not compatible yet with CSS3 new features."
Internet Explorer is a browser that isn't compatible with CSS3, you can achieve these effect in Internet Explorer with jQuery now. - vashmyvindows, on 02/24/2009, -0/+7I regularly use CSS3 in my sites. It's easy and the syntax is clean, and I like to think that users should get more out of a site for being smart enough to use a good browser.
Also, I hope that some day a client says "Hey, you added shadows to my site, thanks!" - chr0nic21, on 02/24/2009, -1/+7Que????
- solidwhetstone, on 02/24/2009, -0/+4CSS? I can digg it.
- serif69, on 02/24/2009, -0/+4¿jQuery?
- dacheetah, on 02/24/2009, -0/+4Cartoons are rarely animated live, it's a terrible strain on the artists wrists.
- drewdiller, on 02/24/2009, -1/+4For what it's worth, I think I could make a derivative of DD_roundies that supports border-image code in Internet Explorer 6 and 7 (and 8 when I figure out a bug with 8's occasional unwillingness to render images in VML). I might start on that after bugfix releases for the existing scripts, should be fun.
- svivian, on 02/25/2009, -0/+3***** IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE!
- thegreatanti, on 02/24/2009, -0/+2That's not true. Expect for multiple backgrounds (which is now in the latest nightly's), Firefox 3.1 supports all these CSS3 properties.
More info, check here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_3.1_for_d ... - ScotchInBox, on 02/24/2009, -0/+2Looks like other good info on the website - bookmarked
- exitManX, on 02/24/2009, -0/+2sweet
- evanct, on 02/24/2009, -0/+2jWhat
- 7m7uf, on 02/24/2009, -0/+2I loath Flash. Anything to get rid of flash I'm for.
- r00fus, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1Maybe in 5 years, IE will be dead.
That's why. - 7m7uf, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1Why Bury? It's probably true.
- ThreeDee912, on 02/24/2009, -1/+2What about CSS animations? Easy to use, and faster than Flash, could be cross-platform without any additional plugins, and no javascript required:
http://webkit.org/blog/324/css-animation-2/
Currently only a WebKit proposal, but it would make animations fast and easy. - 7m7uf, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1Kinda reminds me of the Yahoo (i think) commercial where the guy kept changing what his homepage looked like and there was a programmer frantically trying to change the code to match what the user wanted. Good times.
- haydenk, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1-moz-border-radius-topright: 0px;
-moz-border-radius-bottomleft: 0px;
-webkit-border-top-rightright-radius: 0px;
-webkit-border-bottom-left-radius: 0px;
-----------------
I don't believe those are required to achieve the desired effect in the first example though. - Orbitrix, on 02/25/2009, -0/+1wont work, see my above replies
thanks for trying to help but this is a known BUG - inactive, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1Not religious but prays for the affirmative anyway...
- xCIone, on 04/15/2009, -0/+1nice!
- Orbitrix, on 02/25/2009, -0/+1a table row is absolutely a tangible element..... its a row of a table.... how much more tangible do u want?
yes u can style table rows in safari with basic colors and it works fine.. so obviously safari/webkit think its a logical thing
but there is a bug, where if u set a background-image in the style of that table row, it cascades down to all the <TD>'s and even if you tell those <TD>'s not to have background-images in their own styles (to revielve the image of the TR behind them) it doesnt work.... this is a major flaw in Webkit they have failed to address
it works fine in Firefox, and in IE there is atleast a simple work around... Webkit however, ur simply *****.... - Orbitrix, on 02/24/2009, -0/+1What i want to know is why Webkit browsers still cant properly support the background-image property of a <TR> (table row) element
they seem to be on the cutting edge of CSS3 and all these fancy features... yet u still cant set a table row's background image, without it passing that property down to all <TD> elements.... - godsdead, on 02/24/2009, -1/+1CSS 3 Looks ausom, but its at this point, that there are so many ways to do the same thing, that things get complicated.
- evanct, on 02/24/2009, -1/+1...if IE9 supports them.
- svivian, on 02/25/2009, -1/+1Probably because a TR element isn't really a tangible element. Think about it: if you have borders and spacing etc on your table cells, what are the boundaries of the row?
- GavinZac, on 02/25/2009, -1/+1Use a selector.
- inactive, on 02/24/2009, -6/+5The internet needs more real content not more pretty pictures to look at.
- thethorn, on 02/24/2009, -5/+4ry
- peterjmag, on 02/24/2009, -11/+6More rounded corners and drop shadows everywhere? Just what the web needs! /s
- vic42482, on 02/24/2009, -9/+4I can do that with the power of Photoshop and background property. And oh yeah, it will display on all browsers.
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is