What is Digg?27 Comments
- inactive, on 08/20/2008, -1/+9now i just want a bad ass NES like that.
- AzeemAhmed, on 08/20/2008, -1/+8those are some phat nikes.
- GiJoeBob, on 08/20/2008, -0/+3Stunningly Incredible!
Incredibly Stunning!
It looks like angry fruit salad! - kseymore, on 08/20/2008, -0/+2Oh come on... most people on Digg are probably not going to shell out near $20 a month to some corporation just so they can look at some nice design that they can get for free on the internet. What are you, some design version of the RIAA? Kidding of course. But I'm biased: I personally liked many of the designs and was pleasantly surprised to find I recognized one: I did the color on it myself. I love the fact that someone posted it online so that people can enjoy it (or not enjoy it) for free.
- TheReport, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1I felt like I was looking through a collection of 2000 - 2003 websites when making a website entirely in Flash was all the rage.
- richardiscool, on 08/20/2008, -1/+2I need those shoes at the very top of the post. The Nike ones.
Anyone know what they're called? - Phoenixdown3, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1I'm just happy I wasn't on shrooms looking at this...
- stinkipete, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1no.
- Whitey07, on 08/22/2008, -0/+1Dugg for an awesome blog, cheers for finding it.
- 2Deluxe, on 08/20/2008, -2/+3The stuff at the top is fairly interesting, but the futher down it just all looks like the same messy gungry coloured nothingness.
Either way there's some good inspiration :) - m0llusk, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1Yes, plaid is still hot!
- theadvinci, on 08/25/2008, -0/+1I like Matthew Currys style.
- rkuchiki, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1Punky Brewster called, she wants her shoes back.
- m0llusk, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1Constructivism is overrated.
- MedHead, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1Why does 'colorful' mean 'ugly', or 'garish'? Half these designs look like they were rejects from the '70s.
- salamnder, on 08/20/2008, -0/+1I like when they have the color swatch next to the photo :d
- inactive, on 08/20/2008, -1/+1you got it dude. this is pretty lame.
- korneelwever, on 08/20/2008, -1/+1dugg for "colorful designers" :-)
- enotswhat, on 08/20/2008, -1/+1dugg for the title saying COLOR then linking COLOURlovers.com
- Asvetic, on 08/20/2008, -1/+121. Chuck Anderson / No Pattern
http://nopattern.com/nopattern/ - dawnview, on 08/20/2008, -1/+0colour lovers (now, _that's_ a fetish), pick a spelling and stick with it!
thought this was about colorful designers, turns out it is about colorful designs--English is so difficult! - Fubeman, on 08/20/2008, -3/+2Seriously, what's new or different here? Try subscribing to "Communication Arts" or to "Graphis" or any other high ranking design magazine and you'll see "Stunning" graphic designers all the time (and a higher caliber than some shown on this site). Nothing new here. Move on . . .
P.S. Does describing a designer as "Stunningly Colorful" even make sense? WTF? I've met some "Colorful" people before, but I don't think they mean the same thing. - dnields, on 08/20/2008, -2/+1I agree. It looks like some kids followed some online tutorials and not much more.
It's done well, but nothing here is stunning or different. - peterdavis, on 08/20/2008, -4/+1digg for such a horrid colored pair of nikeys
- llewner, on 08/20/2008, -4/+1Commercial Art is over-rated. Color is over-rated. Long live the Avant Gard movement!
- lopla, on 08/20/2008, -10/+4no,no,no it's "Breathtaking". no no wait, it is "The Most Incredible Designs You Will See Today". No, it's "Incredible".. digg it now!! meh.. yawn..
- kqeda, on 08/19/2008, -8/+1Can i has tut?
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is