What is Digg?165 Comments
- mille716, on 10/10/2007, -4/+53Did anyone else laugh when they showed the "World without God" exhibit? I loved the screams and scary music as they showed pictures of genocide, atomic explosions and gay marriage. Quick question: which one of those three will not harm anyone on earth?
- Abennobashi, on 10/10/2007, -1/+31A conservative Christian on Digg? hahhahahahahahaa never.
- oMeSSiaHo, on 10/10/2007, -3/+29The "World without God" section is a joke. They showed pictures of a wolf eating an animal (how is the wolf supposed to live BTW?), the skulls from Cambodia, a starving child and a nuclear explosion. All of those things happened in a world WITH God. That section is working against itself!
- Ocelot13, on 10/10/2007, -10/+30Evolution FTW!!
- HPCELarry, on 10/10/2007, -9/+28I'm a conservative Christian, and i find this completely repugnant. It is a total and complete misinterpretation of the Bible, and does not qualify as a scientific theory. Such theories must be able to predict future results, and this cannot what so ever. Sorry folks, Darwinism wins.
- TroubleInMind, on 10/10/2007, -4/+21It's perfectly fine to have a Museum of Creationism. A museum is "A building, place, or institution devoted to the acquisition, conservation, study, exhibition, and educational interpretation of objects." One could have a museum of Pokemon or a museum of The Three Stooges and it could be a perfectly interesting place to visit, regardless of whether the subject matter was based in fiction or fact.
However, it appears this particular place should not be called a museum. It appears to be a bastion of advocacy. - andrewrocks, on 10/10/2007, -7/+22"Does it have to do with The Bible? Then it's *****." That dude is my new hero.
- bradg2, on 10/10/2007, -1/+16The funny thing is those pictures were taken while they beleive in god.....
- Jergens, on 10/10/2007, -1/+15Yes. If only the entire nation would turn to god, then those wild dogs with sharp teeth will start to eat the leaves and the grass. Makes perfect sense!
- rune420, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14"people believe in evolution, not because of science, but because their social and moral values, that drive them to reject god, and that's why they need evolution; evolution is what drives the abortion industry and same sex marriage"
Brain- meet reasoning. - IllBeBack, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14Uh, all that stuff has already happened while people believe in God. These people seem to have supreme difficulty with extrapolation and examining ultimate eventualities. They can't apply simple logic to their fear-controlled thoughts.
- Gl4di4tor, on 10/10/2007, -0/+14"Christian Hillbilly"- - anyone see that guy's hat lol
- Roblodocus, on 10/11/2007, -0/+12Conservative Christian that believes in Darwinism, isn't that a conflict of interests?
- Ramble, on 10/11/2007, -0/+11As a Christian you should probably do something, lord knows the atheist community is trying. Please, outline it as unacceptable behaviour, you'd have more credibility.
- HumanWaste, on 10/10/2007, -1/+11The cool thing about this video is that it makes both sides look like dicks. Probably the most unbiased reporting I've seen this month.
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -0/+9Hmmm... The atomic explosions? this better not be a trick question..... >:-(
- tonaros, on 11/14/2007, -0/+8That is so backwards, I have to digg it up.
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8"people believe in creationism, not because of science, but because some man in a church tells them their religious book s the word of God. The world would be a much scarier place is they had to deal with the idea that there wasn't some all powerful god looking out for them. That's why they need religion; religion is what drives ignorance of the physical world around them. It allows them to not accept resp for their own lives."
Religios Person - meet reason - Ramble, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9There arn't any.
Please provide evidence if you make such a claim. - glasgowm, on 10/10/2007, -2/+9No, Evolution is proven.
Stupid christians see "The Theory Of Evoltion" and assume that means we don't fully understand it yet, its not - it's because everying in science is a theory, just like the theory of gravity,etc..
Evolution is 100% fact. - deathweaver108, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8A+
- WonderBoy55, on 10/10/2007, -5/+12Dugg to raise awareness of peoples idiocy.
- mille716, on 10/10/2007, -1/+8You are wrong. There are no cold hard facts to support creationist theory. Sorry.
- glasgowm, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6There isn't one convincing one in any of those pages. If you think dinosaurs were still around when neanderfalls were - you are a ***** moron.
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -2/+8It's amazing to me how some people when given hard facts will still cling to the superstitious. I remember in a philisophy class my prof had use watch some doc on creationists somewhere in the bible belt. Many of them creeped us out. More than a few actually said they would wish their children dead before they would want them taught the theory of evolution. Fanatic Islam anyone? There are nutjobs in every religion I guess....
- arcooke, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6A free society is good, but an educated one is better. When the world has billions of people running around hugging onto ancient stories written by uncivilized people, theres a problem.
- Urusai, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Yep, that's why Iran is heaven on Earth! Oops, sorry, wrong God...
- TheChihuahua, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6...just a shame you can't speak the damn language.
I mean seriously, does NO-ONE proof-read any more? - Hermitwise, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6I think they're more afraid of schools sending children there like it's a science museum than it just existing.
- ingenium21, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6The problem with that statement is that its wrong. "Darwinists" do not believe it all happened out of random shuffling, none of them do. And those of us that do not believe in this idiotic notion of intelligent design refuse to believe in the fact that a "magic man did it".
- Nerfatron, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5"Museum" ? WTF?
museum- noun. A place where objects of artistic, scientific or historical interest are displayed to the public, preserved and studied.
Chambers Reference Online
It would be more accurate to describe that as a "Creationism Fantasy Theme Park." - sdubois92, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6Is that the whole "documentary"?
- Frosty122, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4they showed like 3 people that did......
- glasgowm, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5No you can't.
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4It's insanity to me when you can decide one religion is correct and the countless others are wrong. It's even more insane when you can then say since theses other people are doomed to eternal torment because they don't believe as you do. I'm pretty sure the ancient Greeks were every bit as convinced in the reality of their gods as modern religious folk are of their own gods yet today we call their religion myth. What has happened in the past shall happen again. today's religions are tomorrow's mythology.
- poptones, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4If you look at it with your head tilted to the left, it kinda looks like a man with a huge schnoz.
- Ramble, on 10/10/2007, -2/+6You damn well better make sure you vote them out next year then.
The world is laughing at you America. - maffiou, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4I said in the past and I say again:
The odds are stacked against life, yet, they're only odds... It's all a mater of probability... It's unlikely, yet unlikely things happen all the time...
There is one chance in a million you'll win the lottery, but for one lucky individual, that chance was his and that was enough to get the lot... - mille716, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5You are totally wrong and I was about to bury your comment till I went to the drdino website. That was hilarious. Thank you. I will digg you up now for the enjoyment I found there. Please view some Dr. Dawkins videos or read his books now.
- allenthar, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3It's when belief turns into policy that it becomes ugly.
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Of what tho?
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -3/+6Well there are those "human" footprints along side dino footprint which have been dug up along the Paluxy river in Texas....
- norman619, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Not true. It's similar to how not too long ago anthropologists changed their view that we Humans, neanderthal, and cromagnon all lived at the same time. That we were most likely in direct competition way back when. This does not disprove evolution at all. It just says our view of human evolution needs to be revised given newer better data. Evolution can be seen in action by watching life forms whith very short lifespans like insects and microbes.
- jeffchuck, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4This is supposedly one: http://www.bibleandscience.com/science/images/bernifal.jpg
I honestly can't make out any kind of image on that wall. I have no idea where they get dinosaur. - Dulcinea80, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Oh I saw it... and boy howdy did I laugh!
- brainvdm, on 01/31/2008, -0/+3Evolutionists?
- Frosty122, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3is there proof of this other than, uhh the bible?
- tehkain, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Oh man - my heart stops when I hear science being called 'just another religion'. Really? People like this do not understand what science provides for them indiscriminately. Science builds civilizations - I just wish I could shows these people what it would be like to live in a world without science. That world would make the Amish look like a bastion of scientific knowledge.
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful - Seneca the Younger - TroubleInMind, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3You completely lost me, dude. I think it's cause your premise is flawed. Evolution and the big bang are hypotheses based on scientific, observable evidence. Those ideas can and do change, as new science explains new things and our views become clearer.
The claim that dinosaurs walked among men, there is no scientific evidence to support that whatsoever. Yet this facility has elaborate, professionally designed exhibits stating it as fact.
And what evidence would you offer to support your view that the Earth was created in six days by a supreme being? If he's such an awesome guy, why did it take six days? Couldn't he just blink like I Dream Of Jeannie and [boingggggggg] it's all there? - wolferz, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3ok ok sorry... TRYING to run our country and failing. Does that work better?
-
Show 51 - 100 of 163 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 