What is Digg?Sponsored by Dragon Age: Origins
Follow the Dragon Age: Origins development team on Twitter view!
twitter.com/DragonAge - EA presents BioWare's new dark fantasy epic Dragon Age: Origins. '9/10' from Game Informer.
150 Comments
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -1/+196FTA: Cortez was shocked. "I couldn't believe it when I realised what they had done," he told the photo agency. "I could have lost my life for the sake of some pictures that Gisele didn't want published. Are they insane?"
Says the man who trespassed on private property and "stole" the pictures. He committed a crime to enrich himself and he calls them insane. Go figure. - inactive, on 04/06/2009, -2/+132"Why on earth would people react negatively to me invading their privacy repeatedly?"
I don't know why the paparazzi don't understand this. They make a living by violating the rights of others and act like it's a totally legit thing to do. News flash: you are in fact terrible people. - mudbuddy11, on 04/06/2009, -2/+101its about time. I think anytime these guys trespass, shoot at em. If you kill one or two... nobody, and I mean nobody will care. Then maybe, just maybe, celebs can get some of their privacy back.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -1/+59That guy's pretty strong to have brought her a whole house.
- kwai, on 04/06/2009, -0/+56A shame the bullets missed....
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+45***** the paparazzi.
- gatorfree, on 04/06/2009, -0/+45I just gained a lot more respect for Tom Brady and Giselle Gisele Bündchen.
- Veni_Vidi_Vici, on 04/06/2009, -1/+41I like how you commented three times in a row.
- Veni_Vidi_Vici, on 04/06/2009, -0/+40I think the awesome part about it is that they've all been dugg up.
- Veni_Vidi_Vici, on 04/06/2009, -0/+38And it's not like you did it by accident either.
- scarth, on 04/06/2009, -0/+37i'd say he was insane for hiding in the bushes with armed security guards around him so he could snap pictures of a football player and a model getting married. he's shocked because they feel they have the right to celebrities images since they're public figures.
he's wrong and maybe he'll learn a lesson from it. probably not. - inactive, on 04/06/2009, -7/+44I think the worst part about this is the fact she married Tom in a house Leonardo DiCaprio brought her.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -15/+51Giselle and Tom give a whole new meaning to 'shotgun wedding'
- scarth, on 04/06/2009, -0/+32paparazzi killed princess diana, a little late but it wouldn't hurt anyone if they lost one from their team.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+30Paparazzi are scum. I'm surprised they don't get shot at more often.
- gigi52, on 04/06/2009, -0/+30Don't trespass, don't be where you are not invited and don't belong and maybe you will not place yourself in peril. Just because you have a camera does not give you are right to insert yourself in a private area or situation.
- lepetitmousse, on 04/06/2009, -2/+30should have hit him.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -7/+31i'd like to take a shot at her......vagina.
- stoanhart, on 04/06/2009, -1/+25Why exactly does a celebrity need the paparazzi? A celebrity becomes a celebrity based on good performance in popular art. Most people don't follow celebrity gossip; they like a certain actor because he or she acts well. Keep making good movies, and you stay a celebrity. I'm pretty sure that godlike worship from welfare moms does little to enhance that.
- tommyjwall, on 04/06/2009, -0/+24As much as I want to say "Too bad, they're celebrities so deal with it," I think back to when Liam Neeson's wife died and the paparazzi were all over the place when he and his mother-in-law arrived at the hospital. Celebrities have to put up with a lot, but they shouldn't have to deal with these vultures.
- NYankee2003, on 04/06/2009, -0/+22i like that you actually read the names of who comments.
- staffa, on 04/06/2009, -2/+20I hate the paparazzi and all they represent, but do I hate them enough to want them dead.....
Well no, but I wouldn't shed any tears either and if I was on a jury involved in a trial about their death, I'd probably consider it justified homicide. - tekgnos, on 04/06/2009, -1/+19They should have tazed them, bro.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -1/+18How can you dodge bullets, was he bunny hopping like in first-person shooters?
- thh204, on 04/06/2009, -3/+19In America, yes. In Costa Rica, no.
- SkippyDoorknob, on 04/06/2009, -4/+18The shooter would go to jail and photographers family would sue and win millions.
- iletumi, on 04/06/2009, -1/+14He was illegally on their property, he may have had a gun that is why they shot at him.
"Who gets to punish people for crimes? Thats right! Law enforcement!!"
If you mean a Judge then yes, you are correct he will be punished.
The security guards where doing their job in protecting the person they where hired to protect. It is not their fault some dude was hiding in bushes with some "black metal object pointing towards them". Would you walk close enough to get blasted in the head had he been a gunman to see if it was a camera or shoot? - Samohtneas, on 04/06/2009, -0/+12This is what happens when you don't learn that you're not wanted. If you don't trespass, you won't get shot.
- thisisnotreal, on 04/06/2009, -0/+11Just take out his knee
- rileyhallwood, on 04/06/2009, -0/+11good.
- Daniellex3, on 07/23/2009, -0/+10Same. I wish more people took initiative. Not always by bullets, no, but paparazzi is incredibly annoying, and just because someone is famous doesn't give anyone the right to trespass on their property, or snoop around where they aren't wanted. I know if I were caught trespassing I wouldn't be bragging about exclusive photos, I'd probably be arrested. Paparazzi is disgusting.
- Joodtimes, on 04/06/2009, -1/+11Aren't Americans allowed to shoot people who are trespassing?
- f4nt0m4s, on 04/07/2009, -0/+10BREAKING: Paparazzi misread sign "Trespassers can take shots"
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+10In Texas, if its after dark, and if they are intending to steal things. Also, the wedding was in Costa Rica.
- spyd3rweb, on 04/06/2009, -0/+9Remember the 3-S formula. Shoot, Shovel, and Shut Up.
- inactive, on 04/06/2009, -0/+8how DARE he!!!
- dvnt1, on 04/06/2009, -1/+9It's too bad the security guards didn't hit the losers... Get a real job and contribute to society already...
- martoq, on 04/06/2009, -1/+8I know right! That horse is beautiful!
- firesights, on 04/06/2009, -1/+8"It does not mean that when armed guards promise their employer they will succeed at keeping this wish fulfilled deserve the privilege to shoot at people who have done nothing threatening or intimidating."
Because nothing says, "I have a respectable career" like sneaking into bushes on someone's property to take photos of them so you can profit. A freaking 10 year old could do that job. - jasonstock, on 04/06/2009, -1/+7Plaxico?
- smemily, on 04/06/2009, -1/+7The paparazzi would never have taken those (camera) shots if every wedding attendant were armed with a camera, you know.
- crossmr, on 04/07/2009, -0/+5its funny, in different parts of the world car manufacturers sell different models.
- Daniellex3, on 07/23/2009, -1/+6A little out of your age group?
- NYankee2003, on 04/06/2009, -2/+7too bad you weren't in the car.
- inactive, on 04/07/2009, -2/+7"you are in fact terrible people. "
No, the people who are terrible are the ones standing in line to buy the newspapers or read the websites that publish the pictures. That's like blaming a logger for cutting down trees. - inactive, on 04/06/2009, -1/+6Yeah, how dare two people want to have some privacy when the get married! They don't deserve it!
Do you have any idea how ridiculous you sound? Maybe the security guards won't miss you. - EllimistX, on 04/07/2009, -2/+7I like that you did it as well to prove a point.
- Veni_Vidi_Vici, on 04/06/2009, -3/+8Am I the only one who doesn't think so? At least not from the pic in the article.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 154 discussions
The Digg Toolbar for Firefox lets you Digg, submit content, and keep track of Digg even when you're not on the Digg site. Download the official 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is