What is Digg?Related by Keyword 
How are these related stories? Tell us!
- mikkee07, on 04/23/2008, -5/+29Anyway they are great actors! Godfather is a MUST SEE for every man.
- kakwakas, on 04/23/2008, -3/+21*were
- mickrussom, on 04/23/2008, -5/+14Heat: The one of the ultimate movies ever screened.
Why cant there be more Heat-like movies? Why?- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -12/+3Because Heat was a pile of *****.
- Smaulz, on 04/23/2008, -2/+4You sir, are outside your mind.
- known, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1In Heat they over-acted.
- MRintheKeys, on 04/23/2008, -0/+0Pacino, possibly, but I don't think DeNiro did at all.
- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -12/+3Because Heat was a pile of *****.
- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -3/+2I gotta add - the actors they were are in a different league than the actors they became. Compare the brooding Michael Coreloni to anything Pacino has done in recent years. It's like they are twin brothers... one with talent, the other a wanna-be.
- iPirate, on 04/23/2008, -0/+4Pacino has become Fredo.
- Chirp08, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3whats amazing is when you compare his role in the godfather to his role in scarface, two completely different personalities and he nails them unbelievably. He doesn't come across as being the same guy, he actually looks the part. Those two movies are what he will be remembered for. Every he and De Niro are in now all look the same, you can show someone a still from the last 5 movies they each did and you woudln't know if it was the same movie or not. Show someone stills from the Godfather and Scarface and you'll immediately know it was two very different roles.
- nahsrocketeer75, on 04/23/2008, -3/+25This is an absolute must-read for any movie fan, whether you agree with its conclusion or not.
- Yage2006, on 04/23/2008, -4/+3I don't agree at all its the fault of the writers so why should I bother to read this pos of an article
- mediaphile, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Then whose fault was it that De Niro was bad in The Good Shepherd, which De Niro directed? If the script was so bad, why did De Niro direct and star in it?
Money, that's why.
- mediaphile, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Then whose fault was it that De Niro was bad in The Good Shepherd, which De Niro directed? If the script was so bad, why did De Niro direct and star in it?
- cygnus2112, on 04/23/2008, -3/+3I'm a movie fan. I also really hate critics who over-analyze every single film. I really enjoy Meet the Parents and Analyze This - over and over. While they're not in the same league as Godfather II or Taxi Driver, they're not supposed to be. It's entertainment. For Pacino, I thought he was an amazing devil in The Devil's Advocate. Heat was a decent movie, Any Given Sunday wasn't bad. And he's playing Salvador Dali?
Film critics feed on the work of others and produce hardly anything useful themselves. I'll likely end up seeing all of the movies listed in the article and end up liking the ones with De Niro and Pacino.
I hardly read movie columns anymore and just rely on movie listings, comingsoon and other sites that just tell you what the movie is about. It's sad when I respect the opinions and polls of "readers" moreso than the opinions of "professional" film critics.- Abomonog, on 04/23/2008, -2/+3I agree. De Niro has really turned out to be a good comedian. I've only heard of Pacino being in one movie recently and I don't even remember its title. (Recently as in the last year or so.) Either way it's more correct to criticize Adam Sandler for attempting to do a serious role than De Niro or Pacino for doing comedy or something else off their standard path. That these actors are doing roles other than mob bosses shows that they both have other talents than looking good while pointing a gun. That they get criticized for doing other roles than mob bosses shows how lame the critics are.
- Yage2006, on 04/23/2008, -4/+3I don't agree at all its the fault of the writers so why should I bother to read this pos of an article
- jedmed, on 04/23/2008, -2/+18It's not the role. It's the performance.
- fugazied, on 04/23/2008, -0/+7Its the role as well as the performance, you think De Niro could save his reputation after meet the fockers because he gave a good performance?
- cygnus2112, on 04/23/2008, -0/+5Yes. I thought he played a cool role in The Good Shepherd. Ronin came out a year before Analyze This. I just don't rate actor's "reputation" like the Hollywood industry does. There have been too many cases where an actor/actress was labeled as washed-up and they have come back full force. Robert Downey Jr, Kim Bassinger, Nicole Kidman, Michael Caine, etc etc.
- fugazied, on 04/23/2008, -0/+7Its the role as well as the performance, you think De Niro could save his reputation after meet the fockers because he gave a good performance?
- bonjourmr, on 04/25/2008, -4/+40They will never lose respect from me, they have earnt the right to do weekend cash jobs.
- haydesigner, on 04/23/2008, -0/+7I used to say the same thing about Nicolas Cage... then I realized I haven't liked him in a movie in over 15 years...
(he *was* great in "Birdy" though)- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -1/+4...and in "leaving las vegas" and "Matchstick Men"
- jd72277, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2LLV was OK but I found him over the top (as usual) in MM
- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -1/+4...and in "leaving las vegas" and "Matchstick Men"
- shaelen, on 04/23/2008, -0/+8earnt?
- MOJIRA, on 05/17/2008, -2/+4No one has the right to do weekend cash jobs for tens of years in a row. And it's like the article said; if you want money, invest in real estate, don't sell out for cash by making crappy movies.
- mstoneburner, on 04/23/2008, -1/+2People don't have the right to make money? Don't like the movies they're making? Don't go see them, but don't tell us they don't have the right to make them.
- frasermoo, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1uh... they have the right to earn their money however they want.
- SpencerMc, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2I think there was an implied "...with impunity" after the first sentence. Of course they have the right. It doesn't mean they won't be ridiculed and looked down upon for it.
- ReaXan, on 04/23/2008, -2/+1Agreed, the last great Pacino movie was Scent of a Woman.He should have just ended it there
- mstoneburner, on 04/23/2008, -2/+1That was a pretty crappy movie actually.
- haydesigner, on 04/23/2008, -0/+7I used to say the same thing about Nicolas Cage... then I realized I haven't liked him in a movie in over 15 years...
- anshuman, on 04/23/2008, -3/+8they are great cause they handled great material. As as far i see, we don't have any (that) great material writers/directors around now do we? and the CGI hungry audience doesnt help that much either is what i guess.. isn't it.
- cygnus2112, on 04/23/2008, -3/+1At least the Star Wars prequels saved us all!
- wejmahtin, on 04/23/2008, -0/+10Pacino and Jack Lemmon's scene in Glenngary Glen Ross will always be my favorite; where Jack is telling Al how he closed the deal with the crazy people. R.I.P., Jack.
- diggopolous, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3As well as Pacino and Spacey in the same movie...."You FAIRY! You COMPANY MAN!!!"
- schizogony, on 04/23/2008, -3/+33HOO-AH!
- cuoops, on 04/23/2008, -5/+4No soup for you!!
- icepick314, on 04/23/2008, -9/+4i'm looking forward to Righteous Kill with Pacino and DeNiro...
so what if they sign for some lowbrow comedies?
not every actor/actress can make Oscar winning movies...it's another job just everyone else....
haven't we all worked at McD's or even stock in Walmart one time or another?- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -2/+6Your argument doesn't make sense. You work at ***** places because you need the money. Those ***** are millionaires.
- Abomonog, on 04/23/2008, -4/+1It makes tons of sense. Both Pacino and De Niro made their careers doing big budget mob flicks. Recently both have been doing relatively low budget comedies. It kind of like the Master Chef at a 5 star restaurant deciding he's going to do a few shifts on the grill at Mc. Dicks. Get it now? Icepick gets the digg and you lose one.
- jd72277, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1But when is this master chef working at McD's? I don't think your scenario is very practical. Don't get me wrong, I understand why an actor would take a bad movie as more of a job than a performance to be remembered by.
- Abomonog, on 04/23/2008, -4/+1It makes tons of sense. Both Pacino and De Niro made their careers doing big budget mob flicks. Recently both have been doing relatively low budget comedies. It kind of like the Master Chef at a 5 star restaurant deciding he's going to do a few shifts on the grill at Mc. Dicks. Get it now? Icepick gets the digg and you lose one.
- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -2/+6Your argument doesn't make sense. You work at ***** places because you need the money. Those ***** are millionaires.
- mverta, on 04/23/2008, -0/+10Every artist has a period of greatest proficiency, and it doesn't last forever. They've done plenty. Let it go.
- spuncoke, on 04/23/2008, -1/+19De Niro in Taxi Driver Pacino in Scarface. Those were the days.
- craighoxton, on 04/23/2008, -1/+4What about Pacino in Serpico and Dog Day Afternoon? Forgetaboutit.
- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3Pacino in The Godfather... or in Simone? Ahhh.. the choices we make.
- Hangly, on 04/23/2008, -0/+7Those were the 70's, (and early 80's) when America made good movies.
- footcheese, on 04/24/2008, -1/+1You picked the worst yet most poppy 70s/80s movies for these guys. How about Deer Hunter and Serpico or Dog Day Afternoon like craighoxton says.
- edebolt, on 04/23/2008, -2/+10Pacino more than DeNiro. Pacino has been in some much dreck like the 88 Minutes which got all of 5% rating on Rotten Tomato's. DeNiro has put in some decent efforts in front and behind the camera in recent years.
- Steinr, on 04/23/2008, -3/+4Pacino is one of my favorite actors hands down! and were it not for "meet the ****ers" Deniro might be as well.
- Grimdotdotdot, on 04/23/2008, -2/+13Fockers isn't a rude word, genius.
- funklor, on 04/23/2008, -1/+0fu**ers is a much more appropriate title than fockers
- alwilson, on 04/23/2008, -1/+14Seeing these guys sell out is like seeing that cute popular girl that you had to hots for in high school working as a crack whore. It's hard to keep the respect they earned over the years. Eastwood kept it real, why couldn't they?
- Herv3, on 04/23/2008, -1/+9What about Space Cowboys?
- ReaXan, on 04/23/2008, -1/+4Hate to say it,but pwned
- SanTe, on 04/23/2008, -2/+2"What about Space Cowboys?"
Redeemed by Donald Sutherland.
- Herv3, on 04/23/2008, -1/+9What about Space Cowboys?
- punchinelli, on 04/23/2008, -0/+6All Pacino and De Niro need is one more good, ***** up drama/thriller that pulls in some awards. They both have talent, we know it can be done. I was utterly astounded at how well Jack Nicholson performed in The Departed, so I know that age has nothing to do with the ability to perform (in most situations). They need something pushed their way by Michael Mann again.
- Kythas, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1Age has no bearing on my ability to perform.
Oops, wrong topic....
- Kythas, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1Age has no bearing on my ability to perform.
- Mookeh, on 04/23/2008, -1/+3It's too bad - I wanted 'Heat' to be their only join on-screen performance, because it's such a good movie and was kind of a celebration of these acting mammoths, and now they're going to spoil it with 'Righteous Kill'. I didn't even want to see the trailer for fear of being heartbroken.
- footcheese, on 04/24/2008, -0/+1Heat WAS flippin' awesome.
- MattBlackCat, on 04/23/2008, -1/+3I see it more of a comment on the type of movies the system churns out.
There is no place for 'actors' these days only bankable 'movie stars'
How many times this year will you see movie stars running from explosions, or women searching for 'Mr Right'- mohsenxp, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3as true as that is for mainstream hollywood films (the ones you will see a trailer for every 30 seconds), there is and always will be great quality films being released. The only difference is you now have to spend a little more time digging through the dirt to find it.
One thing I have started to hate is the new hollywood "every movie made from now on MUST have a trilogy" rule. The sad part is that people keep on paying to see these movies, and as a business, why would you STOP making films that people keep wanting to see? - timalmond, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Not sure about that.Phillip Seymour Hoffman, Clive Owen, Cate Blanchett, Ralph Fiennes, Julianne Moore. There's plenty of great movies around (and there was a lot of crap when The Godfather was made, too, but we filter stuff out).
- mohsenxp, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3as true as that is for mainstream hollywood films (the ones you will see a trailer for every 30 seconds), there is and always will be great quality films being released. The only difference is you now have to spend a little more time digging through the dirt to find it.
- mohsenxp, on 04/23/2008, -8/+1bah how dare you even commentate on these great actors? You have no right, they have everyright to do whatever project they feel like. Once you have achieved a certain milestone I think you can be given slack in just wanting to cut down on heavy work!
- ahhell, on 04/23/2008, -1/+2"A man's gotta eat."
- misterteenwolf, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1pacino and deniro go for ice cream (mad tv)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PfDoDWlSp1o- Yage2006, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1That was a very weak impersonation/parody especially the guy doing pacino that could have been anyone how madtv has fallen :/
- petebot, on 04/24/2008, -0/+1mad tv always sucked.
- Yage2006, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1That was a very weak impersonation/parody especially the guy doing pacino that could have been anyone how madtv has fallen :/
- Hangly, on 04/23/2008, -0/+6Jon Voight has fallen furthest. It's hard to believe he's the same person who gave that brilliant performance in Midnight Cowboy.
- ReaXan, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1totally agree, he hasnt been the same since Deliverance.He did make a hot daughter though
- Yage2006, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1More of the blame falls upon those who are writing the scripts and the directors so don't be too hard on them, You can take the best actor in the world and put him in front of a ***** script and bad producer and your not gonna get a #1 hit.
- diggopolous, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Who said anything about a movie having to make number 1 to rank a solid performance? And if the script writers and producers are serving Deniro and Pacino ***** sandwiches who forced them to sign on to eat them?
- timalmond, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1No. The blame falls with actors cashing in.
I'm sure that the Coen Brothers, Ang Lee or PT Anderson would give their left nut to work with either of these guys.
- Skidmark66, on 04/23/2008, -0/+6the measure of any artist is their peak, i don't care what pacino or deniro become or do, their finest work will stand for all time.
- secondfiddle, on 04/23/2008, -0/+6Compared to most of todays actors Pacino and Deniro could fart in a paper bag and still win a academy award.
- diggopolous, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2Well I think the fact that they have lately been farting long and loudly in paper bags and they haven't been awarded disproves your point.
- GrantTLC, on 04/23/2008, -9/+2If you ask me, both actors are HIGHLY over-rated. Taxi Driver was awful. I 've never understood why Robert De niro is so valued, because he's an actor with only one string to his bow. And once you've seen the gritty hardman, you've seen everything he has to offer. Same for Pacino.
Modern movies have only served to show the rest of the world just how talentless they really are.- Skidmark66, on 04/23/2008, -0/+4"Taxi Driver was awful." - i'd be interested to know what you think is an outstanding film and performance ?
- hellotherapist, on 04/23/2008, -0/+0I prefer De Niro, Pacino is much more laughable now. And maybe he should star in a TV series now,
going the same respectable path as the likes of Alec Baldwin, etc.- specialK16, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1I have a man crush for Alec Baldwin.
- chadu, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1De Niro in the untouchables? De Niro in Raging Bull? Casino? Goodfellas? Come on.
- jedinate, on 04/23/2008, -1/+3I totally agree. Both have stopped growing as actors and essentially turn each role into the same exact character. They have become parodies of themselves. I give DeNiro some credit for branching out into comedies, but he loses some of those points for again making those characters all seem the same.
The Pacino thing, with the young attractive women, has always bothered me. I mean women find these men attractive in real life because they are famous rich and powerful, not because they are really good looking. What reason do these young women's character have for being so enamored? None, but the audience expects these men to get good looking women. Unrealistic, for any character driven movie. - hellotherapist, on 04/23/2008, -3/+188 Minutes was turd. Why the hell did they decide to release it now?
Also, I don't know about you, but it bugs me when they decide to shoot movies in
Canada. Many people may not be aware of it, but I can feel it and it totally ruins
the atmosphere, they should shoot on location more often.- forgeflow, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1I bet you never notice it half the time. See Narc? Not filmed in Detroit, filmed in Toronto. Just Friends - not New Jersy, but Regina. I can generally spot a Canadian movie because they are full of Canadian character actors. Sometimes its something as simple as the shape of the mailboxes. Other times its the fact that the American city the movie is supposed to be filmed in isn't actually full of pine trees. But the reason movies are filmed here is that it is cheaper. Not so much any more now that our dollar is stronger.
- kaluzak, on 04/23/2008, -2/+10Pacino has definitely turned in a ton of trash-can performances over the last three years. DeNiro on the other hand...two words: Star Dust. He was so awesome in that movie he earned his right to make a few more stinkers to subsidize his real estate businesses.
- tokyostory, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3I have no idea why you're being dugg down. Great film, great role for him.
- zsavior, on 04/23/2008, -1/+5This story annoyed me so much that I had to register and answer. Hollywood loves doing this, you see these fake critics ride your gravy train and smile to your face as long as you are hot, the minute you don't have the same clout you used to; they proceed to cannibalize you for false cred as reviewers( Britney Spears, Tom Cruise). Look at the movies and actors we have now some of the most celebrated actors do nothing more than take parts where they just do the same mannerisms over and over again and call it acting. George Clooney, Matt Damon, and Brad Pitt come to mind. They act the same way each and every movie, yet they are famed as great actors because they are young and still good looking.
Every movie they do should be renamed to, This how CLooney, Damon and Pitt look if they robbed a Casino. Or this is how Clooney looks when he is a lawyer, this is how Pitt fights as a gladiator same thing day in a day out. But they play to the right crowd so who the hell cares am I right. As for Coppola Go look at what he has been doing, he made sure and produced his daughter, he made sure and made his money with production on Jeepers Creepers, 1&2 in all their cinematic glory, but Deniro and Pacino aren't allowed to get paid? Talk to me how you bank roll your daughter on her films then he can say something about Pacino and Deniro, talk to me about your nephew Nick Cage takes any and everything he can get his hands on, otherwise please be quiet.- jcm267, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1I think that if Tom Cruise just didn't let the public know how crazy he was that he'd still be pretty big. Collateral was a great film and a great performance by Tom Cruise. He was never a favorite of mine since he did the same thing that Will Smith does, which is to try to get a lot of roles in movies that are likely to make a ton of money but aren't really that great (War of the Worlds, Mission Impossible, I am Legend, Hitch)
- mupaully, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1At least Sofia Coppola has made some decent films in the last ten years.
- jroll8481, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2I agree with you on most of what you said, especially about how hollywood loves to tear you down and how they play up the clooney's and pitts like they are great actors when they are far from it. I can not agree with you on Coppola though. He has maintained his integrity with his work, and I dont see how you can knock him for helping his daughter get started in the career of directing. She even made a good quality film. The article made good points as far as contrasting Pacino and DeNiro against Eastwood and Nicholson. Pacino and DeNiro have mostly be playing characatures of them selves recently and mostly playing off of the reputations that they have built over the years as Nicholson and Eastwood have just continued to take roles that show they still know how to make a good film. Each man can make his own choices though, and I would never knock them for doing so. By the way, meet the parents and analyze this were hilarious movies and I dont see what is bad about making a good comedy.
- Duositex, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3I just saw a terrible trailer for a movie with Angelina Jolie, Morgan Freeman, and James McAvoy called "Wanted". Absolutely horrendous. Morgan Freeman doing a movie about magic assassins that can make bullets curve by swinging their arm through the air when they fire? Wtf?? It doesn't even make any sense. Not even close...
Anyway.. my point is that new movies generally suck.- tokyostory, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3They could've just thrown that novelty into Jumper and had a big magic circle jerk.
- AriaGloris, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1It's a comic book remake movie.
- ryanarchy, on 04/23/2008, -1/+3I don't really believe this phenomenon is limited to aging drama actors. Lots of comedy actors are following the same path.
Look at Eddie Murphy for example. He's basically doing awful sequels to family movies that were crap to begin with. Adam Sandler might not be on the same caliber, but he had a few very solid movies which at the very least included Happy Gilmore, Wedding Singer, and Billy Madison. More recently he's done gems like 8 Crazy Nights, I Now Pronounce You Chuck and Larry, and Reign Over Me.
I think the real problem lies with producers wanting to ***** out formulaic movies to make a buck. A good movie isn't always a profitable one. Thus you get movies that appeal to the lowest common denominator. - 55mph, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1I saw 88 minutes last weekend. Pacino's hair got more attention than the script. His hair was conspicuously perfect in every scene. What's left of it that is.
- adragontattoo, on 04/23/2008, -0/+3One of the last good movies that Pacino did IMO was Donnie Brasco.
That is one of my all time favorite movies but then again, I am a sucker for gangster movies.- fokov, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Yea that was a great one. Depp too.
- petebert, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1tell me more about these zombie strippers
- AwesomePossum, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2The same could be said about any actor. ***** the journalist that wrote this and ***** whoever dugg this.
- flidge, on 04/23/2008, -0/+0i dont know too much about pacino to be honest, but as the deer hunter is my favourite film, meet the fockers made me squirm for de niro :( Sadly it wasnt just a one off, i wish it was.
- njs1970, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2As much as I agree with comments that both actors haven't really turned in many awesome performances during the last few years, I'm having trouble believing that they're just doing these moves to get "paid" - I mean come on, how much are De Niro and Pacino worth? $50M each? More?
I'm sure this phenomenon with older actors (and actresses) isn't about the money - they got plenty - I think they're genuinely interested in the projects, whether it's the story or working with a specific actor or director, but for one reason or another that "spark" isn't quite there.
If you don't want to pay De Niro (irony?) an extra $1M for his festival - don't pay him and hire another actor.
Nobody is holding a gun to your head to hire an actor or director so STFU, dust off your copy of Spotlight and take a trip to your local Blockbusters and use some imagination. There are dozens of quality older actors you could use instead that aren't able to open a movie. - markgl, on 04/23/2008, -0/+2this article is a fugazi.
Forget about it. - junkin07, on 04/23/2008, -2/+0http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdHcZB3L3uA
- p51d007, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Real simple....they are "super rich"...lazy, and are not "hungry anymore.
- vofuse, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1At they'll actually be in the same scenes for more than the ten minutes they appeared onscreen together in Heat.
- donkeySays, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1I played Al Pacino's butt double in a movie.
- maby652, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1What am I doing? I'll tell you what I'm doing. I talking to an empty telephone, 'cause theres a dead man on the other end of this f&cking line."
.
.
.
.
"Brother, you are going down." - johneyoung, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1While I really like both of these actors (and agree that they've gone downhill lately), they have always been type-cast. Every role they play has the same overtone and feel to it. Sure, there have been exceptions, but very few.
In the end, most of their films are the same characters with the same mannerisms, but with different settings and scenarios. - dimebonics, on 04/23/2008, -0/+1Just watched Taxi Driver again last night, that movie is so good. How do you go from doing that to Meet The Fockers? I refuse to believe deNiro did it cause of the paycheck.
- mupaully, on 04/23/2008, -1/+2I'm sorry, but saying that they should've gone the NIcholson route is a bit misleading. Not only was Jack's part the worst role in The Departed (don't get me wrong, I still enjoyed it, but you have to admit he was the weak link), he pretty much only plays himself anymore. The Departed, The Bucket List, Anger Management...they're all pretty much caricatures of Jack's best roles. Pacino has done the same thing, playing pretty much every role he's had in the last 15 years rehashing Col. Slade from Scent of a Woman. The difference here being that Jack picks better movies to rehash old characters in than Pacino does, and fewer of them.
- demiurgency, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1Regarding Pacino's recent career, I notice that the author conveniently leaves out Angels in America.
And De Niro may not have had a classic role since Heat, but I have way too much respect for his long and varied career to start taking shots at his recent roles. Maybe he's earned the right to take it easy a bit.
Buried as just general dickery. - rowlodge, on 04/23/2008, -1/+1glad james dean is dead ,or this would of happened.
- jbatad, on 04/24/2008, -0/+0I can't even tell the difference between the two actors anymore. But I think Pacino is worse than DeNiro. Why does he always sound the same in every movie? And every movie he's in seems to be the same.
- ssrc, on 05/04/2008, -0/+0classics
www.smartsexyrichcrazy.blogspot.com -
Show 51 - 52 of 52 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009 — Content posted by Digg users is