What is Digg?163 Comments
- benijuana, on 10/12/2007, -10/+142@nsummy and omgwtf
When you're found innocent, thats fine
when you're found innocent and then wait a few years and write a book saying "well, lets say hypothetically for a minute that I MAY have done it, here's how I WOULD POSSIBLY have killed the bitch"
thats a different story - mookiemookie, on 10/12/2007, -15/+133If only this could happen at every restaurant that this piece of trash visited, everywhere.
- EntropyMan, on 10/12/2007, -9/+105What happened? Did he order his steak "bloody?"
- cardyology, on 10/12/2007, -6/+66Wasnt OJ found guilty or "liable for the two deaths" in the civil trial which followed? I believe he was. I also belive he was ordered to compensate the family of the victims to the tune of $33.5 million. I believe I am right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O.J._Simpson - Azimuth1, on 10/12/2007, -3/+62Before I read the description, I was going to comment on what a waste of orange juice that was.
- helf, on 10/12/2007, -8/+65dude, EVERYONE, except 'white people' can and DO pull the ***** race card.
I'm SICK of this *****. People claim they want equal treatment for everyone, yet everyone accuses 'whites' of being racist while they, themselves, are the most racest people on the planet.
Sickens me. And, yes, I'm "white".
Your skin color does not matter. Also, it's HIS business. He can do what he wants.
Pieces of *****. - truspector, on 10/12/2007, -14/+58@nsummy and omg
If you two fools think OJ is innocent you have both already failed at life. That trial was bought and sold like a three dollar whore and don't forget but but but racism. - Rooster99, on 10/12/2007, -2/+42Anyone else remember this old joke??
Q: Whats the password to O.J's computer?
A:[enter] [slash] [backslash] [slash] [backslash] [escape] - Calann, on 10/12/2007, -1/+41I bet O.J. even brought his own knife.
- GraceMolloy, on 10/12/2007, -10/+46And then he tried to release a book/tv special called "If I did it"
THE ***** KILLED THAT WOMAN, GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK SKULLS! He used the Chewbacca defense and got off. That doesn't make him innocent, it makes him wealthy. - Homunculiheaded, on 10/12/2007, -6/+40"Why is he a piece of trash? He was found not guilty by a jury of 12 of his peers." But by essentially flaunting that he got away with murder by actually having the audacity to write about 'how I would have done it' undermines the whole process. Getting away with murder is one thing, but then mocking everyone else is another. It makes people wish that there wasn't double jeopardy laws, which is a very dangerous thing to do. Far worse then getting away with murder is making people feel like suckers for having a fair and just legal system.
- maximusGeek, on 10/12/2007, -4/+34I thought he was too broke to pay off his law suite. What is he doing at an "upscale" restaurant?
- MikeOSX, on 10/12/2007, -1/+29I'm surprised. OJ usually gets away with murder!
- andshewas, on 10/12/2007, -4/+31I just can't believe OJ's attorney is pulling the race card. I'm sure the restaurant owner throws out all his black clientèle.
- bschonec, on 10/12/2007, -5/+29I've met Jeff Ruby many times -- spent time in his box at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincy. A punkish Jersey-boy he may be. A racist, he is not.
Bravo, Mr. Ruby. - euro22, on 12/17/2008, -5/+29@helf
I wish I can digg you up more than once because of how ***** right you are. Racial sympathy is BS and has gone way too far in today's world. - Fhwqhgads, on 10/12/2007, -6/+28"If only this could happen at every restaurant that this piece of trash visited, everywhere."
Why only restaurants? - MercedRocks, on 10/12/2007, -6/+27Bravo Mr Restaurant guy.
- Cwo655321, on 10/12/2007, -0/+21he probably scared the hell out of everyone when he said
"who do you gotta kill to get a table here?" - badjoke, on 10/12/2007, -2/+19Yeah, play the race card. Classy.
- Fhwqhgads, on 10/12/2007, -4/+20helf is absolutely right
- EntropyMan, on 10/12/2007, -2/+17Actually, I don't just blame the prosecutors for blowing the OJ trial. The old saying that "They Framed a Guilty Man" seems most apt. He was clearly guilty. But the cops ***** their whole case by planting/moving evidence and being racist pricks on demand.
I don't want OJ to have another free day in his life. But I'd rather he go free than some other truly innocent man go to prison for being framed, and/or black.
Justice wasn't served either way, but this is the lesser of two evils, and the issues are much bigger than OJ or his crimes. - aliengoods, on 10/12/2007, -1/+15Because the Goldman family can't touch OJ's NFL pension, which is hundreds of thousands per year.
- VeritasAequitas, on 10/12/2007, -6/+19the prosecution dropped the ball on that one big time, and the police botched the case, the idiot was guilty and anyone with half a brain knew it.
also @ omgwtfroflmaox2 WTF does that have to do with the Duke Lacrosse Players they weren't found "not guilty by a jury of their peers" the charges were dropped showing that it wasn't even a legit claim the DA in that case was chasing glory and votes and the accuser was chasing $$.
Other than the fact that both cases involved people being accused of something your statement is irrelevant. - dclowd9901, on 10/12/2007, -4/+14But guys... if the glove don't fit, you must acquit.
- Smog2k, on 10/12/2007, -2/+11OJ Simpson timeline:
1995: not guilty
1997: guilty
2007: no steak allowed
2010: ??? - jamend, on 10/12/2007, -0/+9If Diebold codes like you do, it's no wonder how easily they are rigged.
- Grova, on 10/12/2007, -4/+13Simpson's attorney, Yale Galanter, said the incident was about race, and he intended to pursue the matter and possibly go after the restaurant's liquor license.
"He screwed with the wrong guy, he really did," Galanter said by telephone Tuesday night. - thatsmyaibo, on 10/12/2007, -1/+9The staff knew something was fishy when he kept asking for new steak knives.
- 8270369, on 10/12/2007, -3/+10This is professional journalism? "was found innocent in 1995 of killing his ex-wife" -- He was found "not guilty." "Not guilty" is not "innocent." Anyone who's seen an episode of Law & Order knows that. To be declared innocent in such a case is to be declared innocent beyond a shadow of a doubt, which is exceedingly rare in any case lest the individual is followed with a video camera every minute of every waking day and sleeping night. Did me down for thinking American wire services hire illiterates to write copy.
- Crispin, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7You should probably get that t key looked at.
- andshewas, on 10/12/2007, -4/+10I'd like to tear up the race card. The restaurant owner didn't like OJ because of his "popularity" not the color of his skin.
- SigmaDraconis, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7So Jeff Ruby is "sickened by the attention Simpson still attracts" and decided to oust him from his restaurant, which in turn will get him even more attention.
Mission Accomplished. - misimiki, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8"The management has the right to refuse service". In how many places have you seen a sign like or similar to this. The owner acted within his rights and his conscience. Bravo
- ubuwalker31, on 10/12/2007, -2/+8@EmoSLWarrior
"Therefore OJ situation = Duke Lacrosse Players Situation except for the race of the defendants."
No, not even close. Duke Lacrosse Players case was dismissed because of Prosecutorial misconduct, namely that there was NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME. OJ situation was a criminal aquital and a civil wrongful death verdict, where there was plenty of evidence pointing to a crime and civil wrongdoing.
"There is no clear evidence in either case that the accused were guilty or innocent."
BS - there was no DNA evidence that linked the Duke players to the incident. The witnesses testimony kept on changing. The victim couldn't get her story straight. - conna, on 10/12/2007, -4/+10I wish somebody would just whoop OJ's ass.
- nutsackninja, on 10/12/2007, -1/+7I bet he gets much enjoyment using that steak knife.
- empeethree, on 10/12/2007, -1/+6surprise surprise he is using the race card again.. well it got him off murder charges...
- ilovethissite, on 10/12/2007, -3/+8It's 2007, I say its time people move on with the OJ Simpson case.
- GeneralFault, on 10/12/2007, -3/+8"attention whore killer".... That came out wrong. "attention whore, and a killer".... There, better.
- phike, on 10/12/2007, -2/+6@omgwtf
If you kill someone and then are found innocent, that doesn't mean he is actually innocent. Evidence that proves his guilt has been leaked twice since the trial. When you ACTUALLY kill someone, society should not care what a court says about the murder. HE KILLED HER. Everyone knows it. Why do you think that a jury's decision should excuse him from all consequences actually killing someone? - paidhima, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4@phike
"When you ACTUALLY kill someone, society should not care what a court says about the murder. HE KILLED HER. Everyone knows it. Why do you think that a jury's decision should excuse him from all consequences actually killing someone?"
A jury's decision should excuse him from all consequences because that's the justice system we have. Violate that and our entire system crumbles. I believe he did it. I believed he did it from the moment we heard the words "white Bronco." Just because I believe it, however, doesn't make me right and does give me the right to overrule the system. That's dangerously close to a "lynch him" philosophy. It's great when the person is guilty, but what if he's innocent? Due process, and our justice system, can be really crappy at times. Sometimes guilty men go free. It sure beats the alternative, however: mob justice. - Crispin, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Not sure if you're being sarcastic, but this was debunked on Charles Grodin's TV show. They made OJ put the leather gloves on *while wearing rubber gloves underneath*. Grodin took a pair of his own fitted leather gloves and showed that the rubber gloves kept his hands from fitting in the leather ones.
- carbonetc, on 10/12/2007, -1/+5Bravo to the owner for throwing anyone out. I wish more restaurants would do that. "The customer is always right" has turned so many patrons into spoiled demanding asshats.
- Saryon, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Who cares? Why is this on the front page, and WHY is this man still getting attention from the public and Press?!?!
- banjokelly, on 10/12/2007, -0/+4Why are people arguing about if he did the murders or not? This story is about taking the consequences of your actions to me.
1) OJ has to take the consequences of trying to profit from the murders of his wife and her friend. That's something we all know he DID do.
2) The restaurant owner has to take the consequences to him and his business of refusing to serve people just because he doesn't like them. He's mixing business and personal there, and that can be risky, but its his place and his choice how to run it. - inactive, on 10/12/2007, -6/+9In this thread and story: hypocrites and idiots (surprise)
100% fact.
Regardless of YOUR feelings on the situation, the man had a trial and was found not guilty. At least have some respect for the very system you pretend to care about.
Remember, innocent until proven guilty? Verdict: not guilty. Yes, the trial was botched all over, but that's the system we have. Either work to fix it, or don't complain about the outcome.
You're the same ***** people that call out "rapists" because a guy was on trial and found not guilty, even though a woman called "rape!". - Fredtheviking, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4I am so glad we don't have mob justice.
- terrya64, on 10/12/2007, -1/+4the other day someone asked OJ if he would ever get married again?, He said " I might take a stab at it".
- borchard76, on 10/12/2007, -0/+3There is no reason that the man has to serve Simpson. IF the lawyer wants to show it is about race then he will have to find a bunch of other blacks who have also been refused treatment. Then to counter that, all Mr. Ruby has to do is show a substantial pattern of blacks that he HAS served. At that point the lawyer is pretty much screwed.
-
Show 51 - 100 of 160 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is