digg

Join DiggAbout

The Digg Crew wants to hear your thoughts!
Please take our short survey about Digg and potential feature ideas.

Natalie Portman finally gets naked on screen in the The Hotel Chevalier

laist.com — Anderson has now done the ultimate: convinced Natalie Portman to do her first nude scene for his short, The Hotel Chevalier. The film is a companion piece to Anderson's forthcoming The Darjeeling Limited and stars Portman and Jason Schwartzman. God, I love Wes Anderson. Enjoy this video!

show profanity settings
expand all
  • blorc, on 11/10/2007, -15/+359That was pretty disappointing.
    • crazydiode, on 10/15/2007, -5/+45starts at around 6 min mark... and then nothing gets shown. *****..
    • quomen, on 10/14/2007, -5/+128Yeah.. I guess my definition of naked is a lot different from that of the poster's.
      • bikeidaho, on 10/10/2007, -2/+17She does have a cute butt though.
    • 68024, on 10/10/2007, -11/+44You're just spoiled by all this hardcore porn you watch every day... I'll take what I can get with Natalie.
    • richgustavson, on 10/10/2007, -21/+105Yeah, that 10 year old boy haircut is so hot. Too bad she doesn't have a penis too...
      • Ziggygallaway, on 10/10/2007, -2/+23Considering that "Nude Scene" (?!?) there's no way to say she doesn't.
      • Gustomucho, on 10/10/2007, -14/+10I concur she looks like a lesbian, but not the sexy one, the male looking one. Pretty disappointing
        • sexybobo, on 10/14/2007, -24/+2what are you gay?
          what are you gay?
          what are you gay?
      • chyya, on 10/10/2007, -16/+4lmao! crazy catholic diggers. you guys sure outdo yourselves
      • kodomosuki, on 10/10/2007, -1/+0I'm genuinely disappointed.
        Traps turn me on.
    • nappyrootz86, on 10/10/2007, -3/+8The bruises add so much hotness to the equation
    • paku, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Does anyone know what song that was at the end?
    • ozziegt, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7Bleh, you see a lot more of her in "Closer"
    • F1R3DUP, on 10/10/2007, -1/+20This is BS. NO BOOBIES = NO DIGG.
    • Aeric, on 10/25/2007, -2/+51In less time than it took to watch this dumb vid, I found the real goods. Get it while it lasts.

      WARNING:
      NSFW, Mature content, blah blah blah

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/14344762@N08/
      • trotskyist, on 10/10/2007, -0/+7You have gained the appreciation of every heterosexual male on the planet.
        I salute you.
      • oldhat, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Why I like low-rent digg...let's see slashdot top this!
    • kodomosuki, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0I agree.
      She was much hotter in Leon The Professional...
  • serpentor, on 10/10/2007, -52/+11Higher res & much better quality

    http://rapidshare.com/files/58485850/NataliePortma ...
    • quomen, on 10/10/2007, -2/+74I hate ***** rapidshare to death. More than I hate stale bagels.
      • c2kris, on 10/10/2007, -18/+5Even I hated it. Then started paying for it, Downloads are fun again.
        • smacksaw, on 10/10/2007, -3/+20You might as well just call the FBI and say "I love CP, send the Party Van"
        • verifex, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3WTG, you just gave those bottom-feeders another reason to exist.
        • BuckCynnie, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3Dude, that statement broke the ghey meter, it was that ghey.
        • juicebag, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1v&
      • BuckCynnie, on 10/10/2007, -6/+3Dude, that statement broke the ghey meter, it was that ghey.
      • SweetMercury, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Why?
  • atdigg, on 10/10/2007, -25/+13Is not even worth watching it if you have to hear the stupid music and the idiotic conversation.
    • xister, on 10/10/2007, -10/+21Well gee, don't let a little art get in the way of you getting your rocks off. For *****'s sake, how old are you- 15?
      • atdigg, on 10/10/2007, -6/+5well gee, you need to learn that not everything stupid is "art"
        • stvspl, on 10/10/2007, -4/+4Well gee, you need to learn that wes anderson is a ***** GENIUS.
          • shadx, on 10/10/2007, -7/+12This isn't art. It's *****. Wes Andersons shtick is old and lame. Slow symmetrical shots of rich depressed characters with 70's kitsch decoration to post-emo/hippy music.
            It's contrived pretentious tripe. Soulless brats who lie to themselves and each other for subtle black humor; kind of like his die-hard fans who yearn to find some kind of "arty intellectual medium" to make them feel "arty and intellectual" in which they can then look down on anyone who doesn't like his work and claim that "they just don't get it" to feel superior because they feel inferior. Hows that for funny?
            Bottle Rocket was not bad for a debut, Rushmore was 50/50 gay/ok and Tenenbaums is probably as good as he can get. When Zissou came around I was sick of seeing smug depressed characters so I didn't bother. It's probly not that bad...
            This short probably just got made because Schwartzman begged anderson to try and get portman naked for him and in turn anderson would get plenty of publicity for doing so. She's way too good to work for him.
            He is not a genius. You just can't see past your reflection in the water.
          • stvspl, on 10/10/2007, -4/+3@shadx
            I hope you realize the cruel irony in your whole arty paragraph there.
            Shut up.
          • seraph582, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4some people don't like picasso - but they don't question his art being "art"
          • pAq6Swad, on 09/16/2008, -0/+0People who aren't hip with contemporary stuff probably call art what the 'pretentious snobs' would call kitsch. Don't take it personal. . .
    • neurosport, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7what conversation ?

      you dont know how to fast forward ?
  • twrife, on 10/11/2007, -40/+25There are a lot of other people out there that I would rather see naked than her...
    • seraph582, on 10/10/2007, -7/+14Yep, same here. I forsee us being dugg down by many a lame pre-pubescent starwars ep1-3 fan for having expressed such an opinion, though.
      • algo, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2one day after they realise how superficial women have to be to look good, they'll know we were right ;)
        • popfrogs, on 10/10/2007, -3/+3Yeah, we should all just lower our expectations and settle for the buffet lovers you see at Denny's at 2am. No thanks.
    • algo, on 10/10/2007, -11/+1agreed, i think nat is a beauty but i'd rather not see her naked, don't wan't to spoil my star wars fantasies.
    • Gustomucho, on 10/10/2007, -0/+8Take what life gives ya, I am sure they will get Hermione Granger soon for you.
  • kenroser, on 10/19/2007, -49/+6Natalie and the clip watches video but naked can musical?
    • Sabretou, on 10/15/2007, -2/+42WTF?
    • RxDaniel, on 10/19/2007, -1/+23That was so bad I think you gave me cancer.
    • shadx, on 10/19/2007, -2/+9doesn't know english and tried to convert using babelfish ftw?
    • MagicCake, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Uh... Yes, that is correct. Now go away.
    • holygram, on 10/19/2007, -0/+11ENGLISH *****! Do you speak it?!
  • ImYourRealDad, on 10/10/2007, -24/+10Another thing I can check off on my "Things to Do Before I Die" list.
  • jordansampson, on 10/10/2007, -16/+6well actually this was her first 'nude' scene: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW1Gu_k3wh8&eurl=ht ... -Goya's Ghosta torture scene.


    • octophobic, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7The guy on the left at 03:05 has an, "I love my job" look on his face.
    • r00tus3r, on 10/10/2007, -1/+20She apparently had a body double for that scene.
  • fatas, on 10/10/2007, -14/+7She needs to make a porn screw this naked BS.
    • ryan899, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1in hot grits....mmmmm...
    • neurosport, on 10/10/2007, -1/+3lets keep fingers crossed ;)
    • c0baltfish, on 10/10/2007, -2/+3What kind of porn do you watch without the naked BS?
  • str3ama, on 10/10/2007, -4/+86I love the level of seriousness Diggers have to tracking her progress towards full frontal nudity..since the time I initially joined Digg I've been seeing frontpage headlines that hinted at the next movie she'd be doing.

    starts at 7:54
  • InfernoBob, on 11/10/2007, -7/+228***** or GTFO
  • scallon, on 10/10/2007, -19/+7Jesus, what are you guys, 14? Yeah it wasn't full frontal nudity by she was erotic as hell. If you want porn go hit up puretna, dont look for it on digg then get pissed off when you discover its not to be found.
    • str3ama, on 10/10/2007, -5/+2Actually you're quite wrong, Digg has had porn on it. Years back there was this demo of a how ajax could be used to show images, and it basically a link to a porn site that used ajax to make thumbnails of porn images enlarge on mouseover. Or there are the uncountable number of magazine spreads, or the offbeat news items about naked people, or sex acts gone awry - and the comments section fills up with "pics or it didn't happen" ..and of course pics are eventually posted.

      And a title that says Portman gets naked on screen is a little inaccurate, I'd bet that it was a stunt double..
  • Ducksa, on 10/10/2007, -24/+12Way too much buildup for a flabby ass and pale body
    • Myonosken, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5Wheras with you it's pale ass and flabby body.
  • hoju7887, on 10/10/2007, -5/+66did anyone actually watch the short film?
    • neodem, on 10/10/2007, -1/+12I did.. and liked it a lot.. but I'm a huge WA fan. I liked this more as a teaser for the The Darjeeling Limited than a quick peek at Natalies butt and chest (though I did like that a lot)
    • davmattucci, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Watched it too... its good in that weird "I think its set in 1973" vibe. But like neodem, I like all his stuff, so I'm probably a "fan boy."
    • Lou3000, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5I loved it. A very sparse short with some very clever dialogue. The play between Schwartzman and Portman was incredibly funny for two people who seemingly hate each other. "If we f*ck, I'm going to feel like sh*t tomorrow" "I don't care."

      • synaesthesia, on 10/14/2007, -2/+14Its ok to swear on the internet.
  • spinalcracker, on 10/25/2007, -2/+45I call shenanigans
  • chrisinsocalif, on 10/15/2007, -9/+31I like how he put "finally gets naked" in the title. Next I wanna see is Jessica Alba.
  • albiniak, on 10/10/2007, -2/+34I guess someone else should tell you guys there's no Santa Claus or Easter Bunny. Hope you enjoyed your movie.
  • fprintf, on 10/10/2007, -6/+12Nice film, I liked it. Not over the top pornotube.com stuff.
    • psmonteiro, on 10/14/2007, -0/+9pornotube sucks, youporn FTW
    • skyshock1, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1haven't seen youporn, but redtube.com is pretty bad ass too.
  • Rupan, on 10/10/2007, -31/+22Im sorry but am I the only one who saw this and was like um she isnt hot at all?
    • clemensmitc, on 10/10/2007, -3/+1Yes!
    • StarManta, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2For some reason directors/makeup crews seem to be under the impression that she looks better with no hair >:|

      She's never looked hotter than she did in Garden State. Bonus points that that movie actually gave her good dialog, unlike this piece of ***** short. When a script makes a woman sound stupid and fake, even Natalie Portman can fail to turn me on.

      Well, almost.
      • MasterShake07, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0I beg to differ about your Garden State comment. I'll agree that she looked great in it but I thought she looked fantastic in V for Vendetta before the hair cut scene. It's still a fact though that Natalie with long hair > Natalie with incredibly short hair
  • cgibbs, on 10/10/2007, -6/+16A free high quality download is available from iTunes
    • neodem, on 10/19/2007, -19/+16Not really free now is it? You have to install iTunes and who wants that bloated crap on their computer?
      • neodorian, on 10/19/2007, -3/+12And the iTunes fanboys digg you down.
      • CCmachined, on 10/19/2007, -2/+5uhh, for me, I'd have to install Windows aswell. and that costs like 100$, since nowhere i can go has XP anymore.
        • drewhenson, on 10/19/2007, -0/+2have you tried bittorrent? they have it for free.
    • miken32, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Only if you're in the US though. Won't work on the Canadian store. And no torrents yet?!
  • brstilson, on 10/10/2007, -20/+7She is far too skinny. At 10:30 when she's leaning up against the dresser she looks like a holocaust victim. It could be just a bad angle or lighting, but not sexy/erotic at all.
    • mpineiro, on 10/10/2007, -6/+5She's pretty healthy. You like them plump I guess.
    • anthonyretro, on 10/10/2007, -4/+10Dude, way to be insensitive to the girl who was born in Jerusalem. There's not a better simile you could use?
      • RadicalEdward, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4Cause everyone knows where she was born right?
        • letdowntourist, on 10/10/2007, -2/+5I think when throwing around "holocaust victim" lines, the better safe than sorry rule should be applied.
      • dracostimpy, on 10/10/2007, -1/+5How about "She looks like a Palestinian in Gaza" then, since they're the new holocaust victims?
  • homerjs, on 10/10/2007, -19/+7Big deal , she's got the body of a 12 year old boy....yuck
    • Machuse, on 10/10/2007, -3/+3she does have the body of a 12 year old boy, people who digged u down are just disillusioned.
  • barkingmoonbat, on 10/14/2007, -9/+60Buried for not showing enough. I wanted to see nipples and find out if she has a shaven haven.
  • gibler, on 10/14/2007, -2/+55I have just constructed a naked and petrified stature of Natalie Portman. My hope is that she will come to life and pour hot grits down my pants.
  • travistubbs, on 10/10/2007, -6/+19This can also be downloaded on iTunes: http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/ ...
  • neurosport, on 10/10/2007, -32/+7my dick is hard

    i guess it wasnt so bad then
  • JenadaeXX, on 10/10/2007, -12/+4This is what Fox should stick to... getting people naked.. maybe well like them more in the end
  • andyd2k, on 10/10/2007, -9/+30Disappointing and while I think she's dreap dead gorgeous she didn't look even the slightest bit attractive in that video.
    • s0rce7, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1are you gay ?.. no really it's ok if you are..
      she's a smokin hot babe in my opinion.
  • VonHugenDong, on 10/10/2007, -12/+0Welcome to (DIGG) flesh of the stars! Your online guide to the best celebrity nudity in film!

    /knocked up
  • danc4498, on 10/14/2007, -1/+13I called it, this was exactly like Jennifer Aniston in the breakup. Why advertise somebody's gonna be naked on camera if you can't see anything? What's the point in being naked???
    • moisie, on 10/14/2007, -0/+4I don't think the makers have been advertising it at all.
      • sacherjj, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1Well, I guess the shots of naked belly and obvious hinting that she was walking past him nude, AFTER describing getting fully waxed in the trailer, didn't advertise nudity at all.
        • bingobongony, on 10/10/2007, -0/+0To any intelligent person with common sense, saying she got fully waxedactually suggests just hte opposite. You owuld have to be a complete idiot to think that she was going to go full frontal and fully waxed. IT is more likely that she would get waxed so that nothing would accidentally show.
      • danc4498, on 10/10/2007, -0/+2It's the exact same with The Breakup. They didn't "advertise" that she was naked, but they did let the news that she was "naked on camera" get in articles on the internet mislead people into thinking they would actually get to see her naked.
  • kfsutops, on 10/14/2007, -12/+9That was almost 13 minutes of my life that I will never get back.
    • ontain, on 10/10/2007, -1/+7that was only about a minute for me. Fast Forward is your friend.
    • iigloo, on 10/10/2007, -0/+3Yeah. you lost thirteen minutes of soullessly browsing the web. At least this way you got to see a great short, but nah, that doesn't matter for the average digger.
    • steve06000, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1Oh, you'd only waste them anyway.
  • xspinkickx, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1lol ......
  • gordonf238, on 10/10/2007, -12/+1Big Deal. I see a dozen girls ten times hotter than Natalie in the streets of New York. And here's the best part, it won't take a movie director to get their panties off.
  • cjh24, on 10/10/2007, -9/+22You people are far to fixated on sensationalism.
    It was a beautiful film, if you don't mind a bit of nihlism.
  • verkon, on 10/10/2007, -6/+3And so the world rejoiced.
  • DannyBoy7783, on 10/21/2007, -1/+29She needed to be naked in Closer. I don't care what yall say, this was hot: http://www.funbolt.com/gallery/files/9/9/6/5/Natal ...
    • Jugalator, on 10/14/2007, -0/+6Actually, it might just have been hotter than this one. :-p
      • SlyProfanity, on 10/21/2007, -0/+1she was naked but they cut that part
  • FoxMcCloud1, on 10/14/2007, -13/+24Naked is either showing Nipples/Boobs or Vagina. Neither of which this stupid artsy fartsy lame ass clip shows. How the hell could people actually like this pretentious crap? Barf.
    • neodorian, on 10/10/2007, -12/+5Go back to your Nascar. Not everything that isn't in your face and obvious has to be pretentious.
    • seraph582, on 10/10/2007, -2/+4agreed. Just because something's lewd doesn't mean it can't be an artform. Tarantino ftw.
    • bingobongony, on 10/10/2007, -1/+1naked is not having clothes on, moron.
  • mavedatthews85, on 10/10/2007, -9/+4She will be my wife.
    • sacherjj, on 10/10/2007, -0/+4All you need to do is get that restraining order taken care of.
  • wilhoitm, on 10/10/2007, -7/+1Queen Amidala naked! Watch out that is Darth Vader's mother! The movie is a free download on iTunes!
    • Kronos6948, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6Give back your nerd license. No one wanted to see Darth Vader's mom nude. Amidala was his wife.
    • alwilson, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1You mean Luke and Leia's mom you dumbass.
    • sacherjj, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1I thought the writing in the first three were the only examples of incest in Star Wars. I never realized Anakin was getting it on with his mom. My eyes are opened.
  • rulesaremyenemy, on 10/14/2007, -2/+45Screenshots:
    http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/rulesaremyen ...
    http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y211/rulesaremyen ...

    Nothing to see here. Move along.
    • seraph582, on 10/10/2007, -1/+4good lord she was hideous in those screenshots!
  • dschirer, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5More Screenshots:
    http://www.scene-stealers.com/blogs/natalie-portma ...
    • Trustthedust, on 10/10/2007, -1/+2Oh wow, anyone who is looking for the song from this movie- there is a music video in this link. Where Do You Go To My Lovely - Peter Sarstedt
  • jonyoh, on 10/10/2007, -8/+4Portman down...Alba to go.
    • seraph582, on 10/10/2007, -0/+1go see alba's new stillbirth of a movie. It may leave a bad enough taste in your mouth to where you'll forget her.
  • chrispr, on 10/14/2007, -4/+25I'm an ass man, so this is awesome.
  • john2kx, on 10/10/2007, -13/+7Portman is seriously "meh".
  • ltj1200, on 10/14/2007, -4/+16way to go douche bag. thanks for totally derailing my morning routine for nothing. if you get excited about that you really, really need to get laid. buried as inaccurate.
    • augieaz, on 10/10/2007, -3/+0that was funny ***** man. i am going to agree with your pov.
  • smacksaw, on 10/10/2007, -4/+12That's fine, but when is she finally going to get naked on my lap?
  • Atdiw, on 10/14/2007, -12/+7If this was the back when Star Wars came out then yes. But with that hair cut it's just not good. And she one of those girls where if she gets nude she loses all her hotness for some reason. Once she gets naked she just gets thrown in the pile of random naked chicks I already seen so she not hott to me anymore :(
  • drwigglet, on 10/10/2007, -7/+2It's a trick. She isn't that hot.
  • dime, on 10/14/2007, -21/+17If I found 12 year old boys attractive, I might have enjoyed that.
    • omnisis, on 10/10/2007, -8/+8My thoughts exactly!....It seems a little scary that so many diggers are into a woman who looks like a pubescent boy. God imagine if they'd seen a real woman naked from the side...seriously boys, time to get off the Wii and WoW for a while and go on a real live date!
      • neodorian, on 10/10/2007, -4/+7Whatever, she is hot. Just because she is thin and has short hair doesn't make her a boy. If you have seen any of her movies you know that she is no boy.
        • KaiserArny, on 10/10/2007, -1/+6But she looks like a boy there.
          • popfrogs, on 10/10/2007, -3/+5I agree with you guys. I'm going to go ahead and call "Catholic priest" on anyone who finds this scene hot.
    • Jugalator, on 10/10/2007, -4/+2Strange definition of "boy". http://img6.shareavenue.com/image.php?file=1d5dd56 ...
      • dime, on 10/10/2007, -0/+6Ironic you choose that picture to refute me, as it looks like she's got sideburns from hell there.
  • Kronos6948, on 10/25/2007, -4/+35It's been how long since V? Grow your damn hair back woman!

    Nice ass, though.
  • iancgi, on 10/25/2007, -6/+36what an ass that girl has got
  • Fetching more discussions...
    Show 51 - 100 of 129 discussions
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.