What is Digg?Sponsored by Activision
Band Hero view!
guitarhero.com - The biggest event music event of the year is now in your living room.
77 Comments
- GoKings, on 05/31/2009, -1/+80That's a really bad airbrush job. She doesn't even look real.
- hantata, on 05/31/2009, -1/+76So this wouldn't have happened if we weren't destroying the environment....
- chaos7, on 05/31/2009, -1/+54unless she's actually naked, not worth looking at.
- huntermcwhite, on 05/31/2009, -1/+47SHE'S NOT NUDE
- diemunkiesdie, on 05/31/2009, -4/+44I don't count covering your boobs with hair and your whoo-hah with hands as nude. I count it as being a freaking tease. It counts just as much as every Hollywood starlet who has decided to say she is now bi. Pics of ***** or GTFO.
- dlan4327, on 05/31/2009, -1/+37Dam straight. No real girl has the words Rolling Stone floating behind her in the air.
- lobsterxcore, on 05/31/2009, -1/+33Keep killing koalas! Maybe playboy is next!
- kanojo1969, on 05/31/2009, -5/+31That's no more a nude photo of her than any of the thousands of nude female illustrations on deviant art are photos of real female dragon-slayers.
Not one square centimeter of her is not 'shopped. Honestly it's ***** pathetic. - firesights, on 05/31/2009, -2/+20This Digg Is Worthless Without Pics.
- chicagodigger, on 05/31/2009, -0/+15Remember when nude meant completely naked for all to see?
Now "nude" just means hiding behind strategically placed objects/limbs. She shows as much in every other venue magazine/catalog she shows up in. - ophello, on 05/31/2009, -0/+14Yes. More nude women on Rolling Stone will solve our climate woes.
- MasterGrief, on 05/31/2009, -0/+13And if they're going to photoshop her this much, it still doesn't really seem worth it.
- samard2002, on 05/31/2009, -2/+14I have no idea who Miranda Kerr is.
- westtexas357, on 05/31/2009, -0/+12I never heard of the chick.
Now I know who she is.
I wonder if that was part of the plan somehow. - hpodity, on 05/31/2009, -1/+10The only awareness those pictures raised was just how fast I can get a boner
- damack, on 05/31/2009, -1/+9The irony of the situation is a lot of these showbusiness madam types love to try and think people are falling for that "get my clothes off for charity" *****.
We all know their only taking it off for the publicty and some PETA type BS allows them to say their not doing it just for a profile boost.
But as long as they keep taking their clothes off SHHHH! Don't tell anybody we know the truth!! - AmericanGunner, on 05/31/2009, -0/+8Do you REALLY need to airbrush her? at all?
- JinxCrow, on 05/31/2009, -0/+8Nude shoots do raise awareness - but not for any of the causes they support.
- Subduction, on 05/31/2009, -2/+9My awareness is both raised and fully engorged.
- inactive, on 05/31/2009, -0/+7you cant see her junk
- AmericanGunner, on 05/31/2009, -0/+7Its all part of the plan
- Jamihabs, on 06/01/2009, -0/+6That tree has wood!
- wassim2k, on 05/31/2009, -0/+5Meh.
- calcm, on 06/01/2009, -0/+5Covering herself with her hands doesn't count for going nude. A swimming suit show the same amount.....this is no big deal. Now if she removed her hands and showed us the goods then it would count. Buried for false advertising.....
- inquebiss, on 06/01/2009, -0/+5Ok, for those who don't know, she's a Victoria's Secret model. She's heavily printed in the catalogues (don't pretend you don't have one under your mattress) and she's in some of their commercials.
I have no idea why they airbrushed her, though. She's actually cuter than that pic. - DavidTurnbull, on 05/31/2009, -1/+6Looks a lot better in real life.
- Axtell2k5, on 06/01/2009, -0/+4Who gives a *****? As has been mentioned she's airbrushed to hell, everything is covered. While she technically may be 'nude', the overabundance of airbrushing leaves much to be desired. Gotta love the article praising her being 'home grown'.
- Evolve, on 06/01/2009, -0/+4I agree, thats a seriously bad Photoshop. They didn't even try to match the original skin formations or tone.
- kcolwell24, on 06/01/2009, -1/+5dugg for whoo-hah
- sexybobo, on 05/31/2009, -2/+5big diffrence between being nude and not wearing clothes.
- colinodell, on 06/01/2009, -0/+3"Miranda Kerr Goes Nude" - buried as inaccurate
- NinjaBull, on 05/31/2009, -1/+4Came here to say that..
- Airbear007, on 05/31/2009, -1/+4The only thing im aware of is that is a horrible pic... come on Rolling Stone you can do better then that!
- inactive, on 06/01/2009, -0/+3where are the rabid hair eating koalas when you need them.
- bobbknight, on 06/01/2009, -0/+3Not enough nude pics.
- evergrim, on 06/01/2009, -0/+3I can't stand airbrushing. They might as well just use CG women if that's the look they are aiming for.
- erydan, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2No nipples no care.
- fangor, on 05/31/2009, -0/+2Gotta remember that one.."Do it for the environment.....koalas...."
- darkciti2, on 05/31/2009, -0/+2How can I get a hot chick to get naked to raise awareness for my cause?
- juhache, on 05/31/2009, -0/+2Me neither.
- bluesman3535, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2Wait....my family and all.'Tell em it's for the environment" Great!
- therightclique, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2*****. I've seen it.
- diemunkiesdie, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2Here she is topless (you can see nipple when the paparazzi get shots where her book is not covering *****):http://www.egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities ...
Here she is in a bikini just so you can "appreciate" her beauty:
http://www.egotastic.com/entertainment/celebrities ... - inactive, on 05/31/2009, -2/+4That's not the only thing she is raising....
(It means I'm getting an erection) - inactive, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2She is kinda skinny so yes most chicks are greater (in size) than Miranda.
- therightclique, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2They were pretty good in the '30s.
- shininia, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2They raise something else entirely.
- smoothmann, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2Dont call "Semi-nude" pics with LOTS of airbrushing in Rolling Stone, "nude pics"
Some people wont know the difference. - Xaevier, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2Since when are people running around poaching Koalas anyway?
- DouglasQ, on 06/01/2009, -0/+2...not really
-
Show 51 - 79 of 79 discussions
Browsing Digg on your phone just got easier with our enhancements to the 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is