What is Digg?Sponsored by newegg
Ready. Set. Shop view!
newegg.com - Newegg.com Black Friday Sale starting 11/25 3PM PST. No Lines, No Crowds, Click and Save.
57 Comments
- Intertron, on 10/19/2009, -4/+73Like anyone gives a flying f@ck about the Shrek sequel.
- thenoxx, on 10/19/2009, -2/+64Oh for crying out ***** loud, it's not like you ***** don't give away everything in the ***** trailers nowadays anyway.
- mkriss5681, on 10/19/2009, -1/+49It's a shame Cameron Diaz and Mike Myers aren't banned from making ***** movies.
- TheDigitalBug, on 10/19/2009, -0/+33The headline makes you believe that it's twitter that did the banning which is contrary to what the article says.
- zephc, on 10/19/2009, -0/+31Or another turd like Love Guru.
What happened to you, Wayne? You used to be cool, but now all your movies blow chunks. :( - mlvassallo, on 10/19/2009, -1/+21What is there to spoil about a Shrek movie?
- YourMomsAnAnon, on 10/19/2009, -0/+19*SPOILER ALERT*
It's going to be filled with ***** jokes, punches at Disney, unimpressive character design & animation, boring plot, and it's going to suck. Basically, it's going to use Dreamworks Animation's standard operating procedure.
And for anyone who hasn't seen it: http://i.imgur.com/vCxQY.jpg - primatage, on 10/19/2009, -0/+16They certainly won't be now.
- rockytop9808, on 10/19/2009, -0/+16Damn guy, all he did was wish you "a happy shopping".
Engrish bots are the best bots. - theSuperman, on 10/19/2009, -0/+14Buried for misleading title.
- RegalBegal, on 10/19/2009, -3/+13The internet used to be cool.
- schnikies79, on 10/19/2009, -2/+12I think everyone should be banned from twitter.
- michaelpinto, on 10/19/2009, -0/+9I'm still upset with Cameron Diaz for her lackluster work in "Gangs of New York"
- Smokeydabear, on 10/19/2009, -2/+11Eat the peanuts out of my *****.
- fms45, on 10/19/2009, -1/+10I doubt that Cameron Diaz & Mike Myers are users of Twitter
- hughesj919, on 10/19/2009, -0/+9Well, Daniel Day Lewis is always on if that serves as any consolation.
- elliotys, on 10/19/2009, -0/+8"Drainage! Drainage, Eli, you boy. Drained dry. I'm so sorry. Here, if you have a milkshake, and I have a milkshake, and I have a straw. There it is, that's a straw, you see? You watching?. And my straw reaches acroooooooss the room, and starts to drink your milkshake... I... drink... your... milkshake!
[sucking sound]"
-dependability confirmed - thenoxx, on 10/19/2009, -0/+8What am I talking about? I'm talking about ***** like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_I_1qzLiWpw
Oh, look, all the plot twists of the movie right in the trailer. This ***** happens all the time. What are you talking about?
And another Shrek movie? What "big secret" are they going to spill? "OMG, the new Shrek is smothered in crappy topical humor!" - random12345, on 10/19/2009, -0/+7I liked the part where the animal made a face.
- iheartbakon, on 10/19/2009, -0/+6I hope you get murdered.
- Smokeydabear, on 10/19/2009, -14/+20***** twitter.
- jer21, on 10/19/2009, -0/+5I want to "get the more".
- tnvwboy, on 10/19/2009, -0/+5The article brings up a good point about the absurdity of this. Is it really necessary to specifically single out Twitter or Facebook when their contracts already had confidentiality clauses in them? This is similar to specifically outlawing texting while driving. It should be implied by the fact you can already be pulled over for driving while distracted. But due to the current popularity of both texting and Twittering the laws/contracts, have to be adjusted to be specific to close any potential legal loop hole.
- Philbert, on 10/19/2009, -0/+4My thoughts on this: "They're making ANOTHER Shrek???"
- swimtwobirds, on 10/19/2009, -0/+4that man Is dependable.
- Elranzer, on 10/19/2009, -0/+3Pixar will usually release a teaser made up ENTIRELY of scenes not in the final cut. It's a little something they tend to do to get you interested without revealing much.
Then of course, Disney will whip up a trailer themselves which all but gives away most of the plot. - personguy, on 10/19/2009, -1/+4Poor people need twitter?
- murraya, on 10/19/2009, -1/+4Luckily for the movie studios, these are two people who I took initiative to preemptively ban from my brain. Also Twitter.
- RobotKeaton, on 10/19/2009, -0/+3Daniel Day Lewis? I thought that was Snidely Whiplash.
- RyomaNagare, on 10/19/2009, -0/+3I like that Shrek movie thats got a bunch of pop culture jokes, and ultimately teaches not to judge a book by its cover.
- velveetaavenger, on 10/19/2009, -0/+3Quarantine and Paranormal Activities were the worst. You shouldn't have the last shot of the movie in the trailer.
- inactive, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2I'm with Bonehead, trailers now ***** screw with you, in the 1970s trailers were 3 minutes long and DID give away the whole plot, now they splice together totally unrelated scenes to make it seem like things happen that didn't.
- BoneheadFarker, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2I'm talking about this:
http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00021961.html
There were a couple of problems with the Wolverine trailer, but the big one was the appearance of Storm. This kind of problem is so bad that it got it's own Digg article...
http://digg.com/movies/Kick_Ass_Scenes_That_Are_In ... - dagamer34, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2I thought it was Twitter banning the actors; that would have been weird. But I think it's best not to have stuff leak out about movies.
- TheCollective00, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2That's funny, but pixar uses the same face:
http://img355.imageshack.us/i/pixar.jpg/#q=pixar%2 ... - HeizeusX, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2And then it became Eternal September.
- shadowspawn, on 10/19/2009, -2/+4He's rich as *****, could pay my meager bills for life. When I'm clipping coupons and deciding what cut of meat I can buy this week, he can splurge at a restaurant with bottles of wine that cost $2k.
I care not for this news. He can survive without twitter. - nepidae, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2I really really do care about this, trust me.
- monkeysama, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2I'm really hoping that big name directors start demanding final cut on previews.
- nepidae, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2*SPOILER ALERT*
They will continue to make these movies as long as they can. Once the stars stop doing the voices they will get replacements and keep releasing "new" ones direct to video. - zeiben, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2if you replaced "twitter" with "making ***** movies" this'd be a story
- RazarX, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2Good, they're both airheads with nothing important to say.
- dabura, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2***** TWITTER.
- SooperSonic, on 10/19/2009, -0/+2*golf clap* Well played, sir.
- neonoodle, on 10/19/2009, -0/+1YourMomsAnAnon: Their next movie is an all new property - Oobermind.
- mrsurfboard, on 10/19/2009, -0/+1Yeah, him and his 5 followers. This guy stopped being funny back in the 90s.
- YourMomsAnAnon, on 10/19/2009, -0/+1I stand corrected. However, on closer inspection...
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DreamWorks_Animation# ...
* How to Train Your Dragon (March 26, 2010)
* Shrek Forever After (May 21, 2010)
* Oobermind (November 5, 2010)
* Kung Fu Panda 2: The Kaboom of Doom (June 3, 2011) [6]
* Puss in Boots: Story of an Ogre Killer (working title, November 4, 2011)
* The Croods (working title, March 30th 2012)
* Madagascar 3 (May 25, 2012)
* The Guardians of Childhood (working title, November 2, 2012)
* Shrek 5 (2013) - getoffmybridge, on 10/19/2009, -1/+2A sphincter says what?
- flamesrule, on 10/19/2009, -0/+1I don't think Mike Myers will be missed on Twitter anyway
-
Show 51 - 61 of 61 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
