What is Digg?699 Comments
- CyberSkull, on 05/18/2008, -11/+887Frankly this "Christian" group is off their rocker. If your going to boycott Starbuck's, there are many real reasons to do so.
- blackjack75, on 05/18/2008, -33/+846If she's a prostitute, then get on your knees and wash her feet, *****.
-- Jesus.
(I might have added a few letters to the original text, but you get the idea). - dha07030, on 05/18/2008, -2/+739If you come home to find your kid jerking off to the Starbucks logo you have bigger problems.
- inactive, on 05/18/2008, -10/+617OMG NO!! not BREASTS!!! /faints
/end of the world - mciampa1214, on 05/18/2008, -1/+403I'm sure Starbucks will do just fine with out those 6 peoples business.
- Narcism, on 05/18/2008, -1/+310You mean only prostitutes spread their legs?
- LingLing1337, on 05/18/2008, -9/+238Is this really all that Christian groups have to worry about? Message to The Resistance: Get a ***** life.
- relaxeder, on 04/17/2009, -25/+253What a ***** slut
- soopertoll, on 05/18/2008, -2/+189lol. usa. greetings from europe. i'll go to the beach now having a bit of a titty-sighting.
- omeomi, on 05/18/2008, -5/+190I'll have to remember to stop at Starbucks a little more often while they're using this logo. I don't really even like their coffee that much, but I'm happy to support just about anybody being boycotted by one of these morality patrol groups.
- Hincapie, on 05/18/2008, -5/+176Does that mean they'll change the image of Jesus on the cross? It's too gory, people might not like that.
- diggtz, on 05/18/2008, -19/+143Ahh Christians, the most sexually repressed/obsessed people on the planet. Controlling minds and genitals for 2000+ years.
- davethe1st, on 05/18/2008, -2/+116...but she has no feet?
- berad, on 05/18/2008, -3/+100I can say unequivocally based on the amount of Starbucks coffee that is consumed in my own church that this ban is not applicable to Christians, but to a radical sect. :-)
- TheMachine1, on 05/18/2008, -1/+87A prostitute's service fees in many countries are cheaper that the price of a cup of Starbucks.
- Ridgeliner7, on 05/18/2008, -4/+89They did the same thing to the Los Angeles County seal a few years ago.....so no surprise here....its amazing, isn't it, that there are people out there looking for such things!
- LeeSoong, on 05/18/2008, -6/+91Christian groups seeing prostitutes everywhere,
coffee cups, Music CD album covers, in their church, etc...
Sounds like somebody got 'issues'.
(Their own wishful thinking?)
When will fun-Duh-mental-ists
accept they indeed are all god's creatures too
- and as creatures they have sex,
are born in flesh and blood, live and die
just like every other animal on the planet.
It's nice to have the big brain and sing songs and make tools,
but strip away the clothing and technology and humans are just funny looking monkeys. - eliburford, on 05/18/2008, -14/+96People like this make me feel bad for having Christian views.
- spdorsey, on 05/18/2008, -7/+84WHO CARES?!?!?!?!?!
- StuartGibson, on 06/14/2009, -1/+70No problem, we'll get right on with firing the 16th Century Norse Woodcutter that originally made it.
- inactive, on 05/18/2008, -1/+67How does this Christian group know what a naked prostitute spreading her legs looks like?
... - wacomwacoff, on 05/18/2008, -2/+64What kills me is that Starbucks used this logo for years when they first got started... but only now that they've brought it back for a promo do the Christians freak out. You're about 20 years late, fellas.
- dstz, on 05/18/2008, -0/+60Decent women do it with legs crossed.
- Enche, on 05/18/2008, -6/+66"Starbucks says the logo is appropriate. It'll be around for a few weeks."
Only a few weeks? Are they giving in or is this some sort of really lame promotional thing? - yosserhughes, on 05/18/2008, -0/+58I had a girlfreind once that wanted me to put it in her ear.
Every time I tried to put it in her mouth she'd turn her head aside. - wacomwacoff, on 05/18/2008, -1/+58It's just a promo. This is their original logo.. they're using it to promote their new Pike Place coffee. The modern green logo will be back in the summer.
- LeeSoong, on 05/18/2008, -2/+59Idiocracy
Joe - 'I sure could go for a Starbucks right now.'
guy - 'I don't think we have time for a hand job Joe.'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z33gpRWWXPA - Gir53457, on 05/18/2008, -0/+53Ear?
- Falldog, on 05/18/2008, -2/+55They should make sure to boycott Virginia as well... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Seal_of_Virgini ...
- inactive, on 05/18/2008, -7/+59That would be a Fapp-uccino I guess.
Thank you, I'll be here all week - MusicMagi, on 05/18/2008, -6/+56They're just breasts for god's sake (no pun intended) They need to find more productive things to do with their time than boycotting images of breasts..
- fakekevinrose, on 05/18/2008, -5/+54i like to beat off when i sip my frappuccino, please don't cover the breasts
- bicyclethief, on 05/18/2008, -1/+50The Resistance? With a pretentious and grandiose name like that, they better be fighting against Skynet besides Starbuck.
Is the mermaid supposed to wear a turtleneck? Dumbass prudes. - scottfarner, on 05/18/2008, -6/+55They should also boycott Dunkin Donuts. That "O" looks a lot like a prostitute's vagina/mouth/anus/ear...
- Tubaman3010, on 05/18/2008, -4/+50Mermaids have feet?
- RyanCoke, on 05/18/2008, -2/+46I like the fact that the "Resistance" points out that they think this depicts a lady with her legs spread.
What kind of women do they know that have scaly fish legs?
Though if I ever find a woman that can bend like that... - azbmr, on 05/18/2008, -1/+45Yes, it is the original logo based on some Nordic woodcut made in the 1400s (back when people didn't have time to be offended about stupid things) that they are re-using to promote their "going back to basics" campaign.
- shinedout, on 05/18/2008, -8/+50Right on Cyberskull, these people are insane. Only a group of extremely sexually repressed individuals would notice something so tiny like this and make a HUGE deal about it...
..Oh yeah, its a terrible thing to see a partially nude fixture on a coffee cup, but its totally cool to take an army and shoot a bunch of people in a country that had no threat to us...
Just sayin'... - alex4u2nv, on 05/18/2008, -4/+44Thank goodness this is a generation that will be dead or senile in about 20years!
- davethe1st, on 05/18/2008, -1/+35Ear Sex!
- dixienormous101, on 05/18/2008, -5/+39looks like "spread legs"??? Are you ***** serious? It's based off a two-tailed mermaid. Wtf are these idiots smoking?
- BraveQuail, on 05/18/2008, -0/+32Um Muslims?
- Stroggoth, on 05/18/2008, -5/+36You just have to understand that religious folk are scared people; they are scared of death, they are scared of the unknown. The church gives them specific things to be scared about, so that they can feel "better" and less stressed about their fear with directed control behaviors. In this case, the church told them sex is bad, so they search for things to find sexually provocative. When you have that directive, then a coffee cup with a naked mermaid is beyond your control, and you need to control it by complaining. This is the same reason that so many hard-core republicans are scared of gay marriage, scared of other races, etc.
Fear is a huge motivator. - crowbar77, on 05/18/2008, -3/+31Yeah like how they treat there employees. What kind of idiot thought of free healthcare and other benefits, including a higher wage than most of its competitors.
- lamiaconfitor, on 05/18/2008, -1/+29heh, and if they think nudity is evil, they really would have found the baptisms of Jesus' time absolutely satanic.
- Bartboy919, on 05/18/2008, -2/+30Apparently yo don't know the US to well, most people could care less about someone being maimed, but show one titty and the country goes berserk.
- 1807, on 05/18/2008, -4/+31At least the cup will make for easy clean up.. or a hilarious joke
- OnlyGirlOnDigg, on 05/18/2008, -3/+30I know, people over here in the States are so uptight. It should be as legal and socially acceptable for me to walk around without a shirt as it is for males.
- geneusutwerk, on 05/18/2008, -3/+29The Resistance also believes that 9/11 was an inside job and in the existence of the Illuminati.
http://www.theresistancemanifesto.com/modules.php? ... - EarlOfLade, on 05/18/2008, -14/+38I want the bible banned!
It's harmful to kids, it's filled with some of the worst forms of violence known to man, it' has some real disturbing sexual references, talks about killing babies, nailing poeple to pieces of wood, talks about burning people alive in lakes of fire.
Quite frankly, this book need at least an age limit of 18 and to be marked with clearly visible stickers informing people about the violent and sexual content.
It would have been best if this book was not sold in stores due to it's violent and graphic content, if sold in book stores, it should be placed in the Science-Fiction section. -
Show 51 - 100 of 704 discussions
Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our 
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 