- Emused, on 05/02/2008, -5/+3Would that not defeat the aerodynamics,ergo fuel efficiency and the whole purpose of the vehicles design? Or is this a Homer Simpson ?
- dr0psy, on 05/03/2008, -0/+3the article says he loses 2mpg with the top up and gains 4mpg with it down
and theres more to the priuss fuel efficiancy than aerodynamics
- dr0psy, on 05/03/2008, -0/+3the article says he loses 2mpg with the top up and gains 4mpg with it down
- db0255, on 05/02/2008, -5/+1pretty sweet, how do i do that?
- edilclyde, on 05/03/2008, -0/+3with a can opener
- ieure, on 05/07/2008, -0/+1And $17,500.
- edilclyde, on 05/03/2008, -0/+3with a can opener
- AskaGenius, on 05/03/2008, -0/+17I honestly don't think it looks good.
- SuperWinner, on 05/03/2008, -2/+2Why do all fuel efficient vehicles have to look like a deformed tampon?
- dr0psy, on 05/03/2008, -1/+2its definitely an improvement though
- h2200161813, on 05/03/2008, -3/+2it would look a lot better with out the tops f the doors but i would drive it
- bagelpirate, on 05/03/2008, -1/+9No.
- krolm, on 05/03/2008, -1/+3ricer status
- hexx54, on 05/03/2008, -2/+12Title should be: "How to Make the Prius look even worse then it already is!"
- LizNovack, on 05/03/2008, -0/+3It's like scalping a pig
- brycelb, on 05/03/2008, -1/+5The people at wired should stick to tech writing since it's obvious they haven't got the slightest idea what a good looking car is.
- Joshuarr, on 05/03/2008, -0/+2Fugly!!
http://priuschat.com/forums/attachments/prius-main ... - jcm267, on 05/03/2008, -0/+7Buried as inaccurate. That doesn't look good.
- webman77, on 05/05/2008, -0/+0Ragtop, design, colour - everything is really average. Look at this and you will identify world class design: http://www.porsche.com ;-)
- ieure, on 05/07/2008, -0/+1"Please stand by while I upgrade the forum software.
Be right back!"
So much for that forum.

Digg is coming to a city (and computer) near you! Check out all the details on our