Sponsored by HTC
You and You and You. view!
youtube.com - You don't need to get a phone. You need a phone that gets you.
156 Comments
- pinetree, on 09/17/2009, -1/+366Would it have killed them to put the doctored and un-doctored photos on the same page?
- infinigtr, on 09/17/2009, -2/+324Why does it start on picture 2?
- uptwolait, on 09/17/2009, -5/+229Still my favorite doctored photo:
http://clearvoyant.tripod.com/oswald.jpg - L0NER, on 09/17/2009, -3/+196I can tell by the 150 year old pixels
- Feener, on 09/17/2009, -2/+162Haha, Hitler even sucks at photoshop.
- svendm, on 09/17/2009, -1/+140Ah, not that Kim Jong Il sham again. It's NOT faked. Here's the guy near the same stand (same banner at the top, if you see the uncropped version of the alleged shoop), but taken at a different angle:
http://i25.tinypic.com/2qlbz0m.jpg
You can see the same 'disappearing line' at the hole they've left at the middle of the stand (I guess this is taken just before or after a similar group-photo) Same thing. There's clearly just some white board on the front of the stand at that point. Perhaps simply to mark where the middle is. - newsmonster, on 09/17/2009, -1/+139The Oprah one is terrible! How did they think they could pull that one off? It's worse than that recent Microsoft photo f*ck up.
- aznhomig, on 09/17/2009, -0/+132They didn't even try in the Hitler photo.
- worldpeacenow, on 09/18/2009, -0/+112I liked the article, but the way it was presented gets a D-. How hard would it have been to put them side by side????? jeez.
- brakes4turtles, on 09/18/2009, -0/+95Well when your chief Photoshop expert is being Photoshopped out, you tend to have a problem.
- inactive, on 09/17/2009, -5/+94Why does it piss me off so much that they removed McCartney's cigarette?
- SlyT862, on 09/18/2009, -2/+89This one became pretty hilariously iconic:
http://www.wired.com/news/images/full/bush_hoax2_f ... - magic6435, on 09/17/2009, -0/+85***** you Time and your 21 pages!
- DarthVolta, on 09/17/2009, -1/+70It's okay, you can say '*****' here.
- Atario, on 09/17/2009, -0/+67That's a pretty incredible alteration job on the Civil War photo, considering photography had barely even been invented...
- Shadic, on 09/17/2009, -0/+67How about reading the text?
- kinseyincanada, on 09/18/2009, -0/+62jesus ***** christ a top ten list that spans 21 pages ***** YOU TIME.COM
- JackDud, on 09/17/2009, -0/+56I can't even tell the friggen differences. My mind forgets the previous image right after I click "next"
- FallFromGrace, on 09/17/2009, -0/+44I found it extremely creepy how people can try to erase you from history just from editting a photo. Creepier is if you wonder if there are photos today that haven't been caught.
- crazzy88ss, on 09/17/2009, -0/+41Yea the guy from the 1800s did it better.
- seaofcheese, on 09/17/2009, -0/+29Side by side would be so much better.
- Sinestro, on 09/17/2009, -0/+27well then.
- macfan93, on 09/18/2009, -2/+25The government didn't edit the pic. The newspaper did. They have freedom of press which allows them to do that. Therefore, it is a only democracy in the middle east WIN.
- g0atm0nster, on 09/18/2009, -0/+23Then they wouldn't get ad revenue for the full 20 pages.
- Hardataq, on 09/18/2009, -0/+22Nein nein nein nein nein nein nein!
- Atario, on 09/18/2009, -0/+22"decades"
Understatement of the week. - lydiasky, on 09/17/2009, -0/+22Seeing the doctored images of the older pictures were interesting. Especially the ghostly image one ... I imagine it was a lot of manual cutting and pasting?
- OutAndAbout, on 09/17/2009, -1/+22Wow... Tripod. Really? My 486 just trembled in fear with the mere mention.
- perryc, on 09/17/2009, -12/+33The Israeli one (last) is the winner. un-*****-believable those *****
- defectDS, on 09/18/2009, -0/+21lol cultural variances
- diggB, on 09/17/2009, -2/+20Some of the photos (such as the first one with Blair) are pretty amazing considering that they were taken decades before PS was even invented.
- junkfoodjoe, on 09/18/2009, -3/+21http://4chanarchive.org/images/155744808/125137173 ...
http://4chanarchive.org/images/155744808/125137145 ...
http://4chanarchive.org/images/155744808/125137155 ... - EdgarG8, on 09/17/2009, -0/+17Yeah but they were into some crazy, donkey, chicken, anal beads, water hoses, cups, ping pong balls and other kinky stuff. And at that time very few were willing to try it.
- Atario, on 09/18/2009, -2/+17Or, better yet, with rollovers.
- immatellyouwhat, on 09/17/2009, -2/+16William T. Sherman was such a badass.
- hazello, on 09/18/2009, -0/+14Please, someone teach these idiots JavaScript. It's much too difficult to compare the photos when the whole page reloads.
- zaferk, on 09/17/2009, -0/+14White glamour models have better bodies than overweight black women?
- inactive, on 09/18/2009, -2/+16Yes, and?
- inactive, on 09/18/2009, -1/+14Strange as it may seem, "cut and paste" actually used to literally mean "cut and paste".
Never even think about it these days. Jesus, imagine the time and effort to do a simple cut and paste job. - Smeggit, on 09/18/2009, -0/+12Buried for slide-show crapness.
- ukiya, on 09/18/2009, -0/+12Ministry of Truth anyone?
- cmf2071, on 09/18/2009, -1/+12Buttsecks ??
- rhoonah, on 09/17/2009, -0/+11my thoughts exactly... Dugg for common sense.
- Cyberdropping, on 09/17/2009, -0/+11I smell a slideshow....
and this one smells real bad - speedk0re, on 09/17/2009, -0/+11it was probably just an animated "under contruction" gif anyway
- stevenbrown, on 09/18/2009, -1/+12I got a ban for having free speech on digg...
- DulcetTone, on 09/18/2009, -0/+10Annals, technically
- jeriqo, on 09/17/2009, -0/+10tripod ***** it
-
Show 51 - 100 of 160 discussions




What is Digg?