digg

Join DiggAbout

Discover the best of the web!
Learn more about Digg by taking the tour.

The Marxist Underpinnings of Homosexual Marriage

cnsnews.com — The political landscape on homosexual marriage has become so vicious among those on the left that virtually any opinion is now fair game to be classified as bigotry.

Bury
show profanity settings
expand all
  • GodzGurl59, on 05/16/2008, -2/+7From the article:
    "Here's a little bit about what Marx and Engels had to say about the "bourgeois family": "The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry."

    As for "bourgeois marriage," the Communist Manifesto reduces wives to "instruments of production," and generally regards marriage as a form of prostitution. "Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common," wrote Marx and Engels, who also advocated, "an openly legalized system of free love.' "

    I have a book that talks about what happened in the USSR when Lenin took over. Men's wives and daughters were raped and FORCED to have sex with as many men as wanted to. It is communism, which is a form of faschism (read "Liberal Faschism" by Jonah Goldberg!) at its pathetic best. They don't jsut want "equal" rights for themselves and to be left to live their lives: they want us to accept and put our stamp of approval on it. Now the rank and file, going from man to man (up to 50 partners each) males may not, but trust me....the leaders of this movement...the political ones..............absolutly do.
    I recommend reading the "communist manifesto." It is relatively small and quick to get thru. Know thy enemy I always say. If you do....not the section on 'the community of women." They want to place women back as they were in the ancient world..........simply for sex and procreation.....though really in the ancient world most males had sex with whatever they conqured........man, woman, child............apparently there preferred little boys.
    Dennis Prager has a great article on that topic and why Judeaism and then Christianity were so different. Christ elevated women to equality with men. Even the Jewish religion didn't do that as much as Christianity did.
  • animalwheeler, on 05/16/2008, -2/+7I find it oddly humorous, that when someone says a "progressive" or "liberal" is Socialist, they deny it vehemently. But when you look at the things they support and work towards, these issues always have "underpingings" (sometimes dead-on carbon copies) of Socialist ideals set forth on the Manifesto.
    • KJeffV, on 05/16/2008, -2/+6Yeah, funny thing about that. Must be entirely coincidental.
      • animalwheeler, on 05/16/2008, -1/+6coincidences, what coincidences...
        they're all non-related, dontcha know.
        /rollseyes
      • TYRONEBR549, on 05/16/2008, -1/+4Progressive means moving towards the Marxist way of life.
  • Tugging, on 05/16/2008, -2/+6All of this is what happens when man decides to ignore the fact that there is a divine Creator Who has spoken. The end result is chaos.
  • IconoclastStill, on 05/16/2008, -2/+5There is a simple and consistent answer here:

    (a) On any given issue, there is the (self) righteous way of the left which (they fervently believe) any moral, feeling, individual should embrace.

    (b) Any comment, belief or facial twitch which contradicts (a) is bigotry.

    Thus the individual who does not bleat the leftist party line is a bigot. Period.
  • TYRONEBR549, on 05/16/2008, -2/+2In the end they will fail.
  •  

    Login or register to add a comment

    Create a new account or login to join in the conversation on Digg. You'll also be able to Digg stories to help promote things you like.


© Digg Inc. 2008 — Content posted by Digg users is dedicated to the public domain.
DIGG, DIGG IT, DUGG, DIGG THIS, Digg graphics, logos, designs, page headers, button icons, scripts, and other service names are the trademarks of Digg Inc.