41 Comments
- poidh, on 01/09/2008, -1/+42Having SFW in the title ensures that this topic will have 20% of the views it would have had if it had been NSFW instead.
- theluis, on 01/09/2008, -2/+30idk, i still like: http://www.airtightinteractive.com/projects/relate ...
- jkremer3, on 01/09/2008, -1/+22It needs to be sped up.
- dnields, on 01/09/2008, -0/+14Having the words "bikini" and "babes" in the title ensures it will hit the front page.
- brook011, on 01/09/2008, -3/+16Congratulations! You've been selected to receive two free IPOD Nanos!
- TrueJustice, on 01/09/2008, -0/+10the idea is right. 1. you dont need SFW in the title if its not even borderline, when I see SFW, I'm secretly hoping that its really NSFW, and when its totally SFW, I just wonder why you said anything at all. 2. Should be faster. 3. cant handle the traffic. 4. if yer gonna have bikini babes, have a hot girl or two, why am I looking at far away shots of the beach and a couple asian girls stumbling in the sand?
- WebWorker, on 01/09/2008, -0/+6I like the last picture.. It's very artistic.. contrasting the natural beauty of the woman's body and playful colors, with a big ol' beer gut!
- ifnotme, on 01/09/2008, -1/+6You can, click in the lower right, put in any user, group, query etc.
- hode, on 01/09/2008, -0/+5http://www.flickrticker.com/?query=topless
- MindStalker, on 01/09/2008, -0/+4Umm its handling the traffic just fine.. shrugs.
- mrand01, on 01/09/2008, -0/+4yeah felix does great work :-)
- DTRNathen, on 01/09/2008, -0/+4Yeah. I love the Digg effect.
- inactive, on 01/10/2008, -0/+3I can has a NSFW vershun?
- inactive, on 01/09/2008, -1/+4Did you hear that awful sound?
- FuzzyBunny89, on 01/10/2008, -0/+1hehe....boobs.
- rq60, on 01/09/2008, -1/+2This "Connection was reset" image is rather boring, actually.
- chrisrbailey, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1My MacOS X screensaver, Visionary Saver, let's you pick Flickr Ticker as your screen saver, including selecting various search/query/user options. Check it out here: http://cobaltedge.com/index.php/visionary-saver/
- Eddible, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1It's so tacky, eugh.
- mpete510, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1And now I lose all of my free time.
- akhepcat, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1You can. Try it with groups, works like a champ, or rather, might not until the API account is unlocked.
- hode, on 01/09/2008, -1/+2http://www.flickrticker.com/?query=boobs
- degron, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1WOW!
- TheGonzo, on 08/13/2008, -0/+1Now that is borderline NSFW
- gamebittk, on 01/09/2008, -0/+1Submitted under: Arts and Culture
- tylerc66, on 01/09/2008, -1/+2This is so much better http://www.flickrleech.net/
- arizonagroove, on 01/09/2008, -2/+2I'd more impressed if it was done with HTML/Javascript not Flash.
- houndeyex, on 01/09/2008, -1/+1BOOOOOM! (down)
- jstem1994, on 01/09/2008, -1/+1A viewer called "Error Code 64: Host not available"?
- elhaf, on 01/09/2008, -1/+1Oh man, I work for a one-piece swimsuit manufacturer! Gahh!!!
- bentman78, on 01/09/2008, -6/+6Don't put your websites on Digg if they can't handle the traffic....
buried. - sekith, on 01/11/2008, -0/+0lies, i thought cool people had it all :(
- Mainland, on 01/09/2008, -0/+0Those pink letters are really distracting and difficult for my eyes.
And tacky too. - jstem1994, on 01/09/2008, -2/+1"The Flickr User ID is invalid or unset." ...Buried
- slieberman, on 01/09/2008, -10/+5totally cool. Wish you could feed in your own parameters.
- hidefchef, on 01/09/2008, -6/+1ooooo nice!
- soyan, on 01/09/2008, -8/+1this is pretty cool!



What is Digg?
Check out the new & improved