64 Comments
- RobertWright, on 11/10/2009, -1/+112Warning: This photo may Mess with your mind!
- jumbalia, on 11/11/2009, -1/+82cool pic, but could use a bit of cropping. The top portion distracts from the effect.
- ChileanGoD, on 11/11/2009, -1/+56˙ǝɹnʇɔıd sıɥʇ ɥʇıʍ ƃuoɹʍ ƃuıɥʇou ǝǝs ı
- DaviDTC, on 11/11/2009, -1/+45Reminded me of this, but not nearly as cool considering he just flipped an image upside down.
http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/559/camelss.jpg - strongsad, on 11/11/2009, -0/+43How did those shadows cast PEOPLE?!?!!
- BaoUnit, on 11/11/2009, -0/+28They did... "I rotated the shot 180° degrees."
- TheTyPod, on 11/11/2009, -1/+28This accidentally my brain.
- Tomoir, on 11/11/2009, -10/+36There, I fixed it: http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/17/fixedp.jpg
- ToastPop, on 11/11/2009, -0/+19I feel like throwing up.
- swicken, on 11/11/2009, -1/+15I think it's more of a case of 'it doesn't ***** matter so stop bringing it up'.
I don't use reddit because it's a poorly designed ugly POS. Because it's users scour the internet more religiously finding pictures to post doesn't mean anything to me.
If someone brings it over to digg then huzzah I get to see it. - moriarty23, on 11/11/2009, -2/+15Maybe if the whole top half of the photo wasn't inhabited by upside down booths without shadows.
Sure, it's a neat idea, but a really crappy example of execution or as you say "art." - DarkGerbil, on 11/11/2009, -1/+13[grammar-nazi] an [/grammar-nazi]
- Ghostwo, on 11/11/2009, -0/+12http://imgur.com/UibQc.jpg
There. I fixed it. - swicken, on 11/11/2009, -1/+12No way, this photo was featured on another site before digg?
No ***** way. - aquapete, on 11/11/2009, -1/+12¡¡¡ʎɐʍ ou
- daytona81, on 11/11/2009, -4/+13yep, i can also take a picture and flip it upside down
- drethedog, on 11/11/2009, -0/+8Agreed, if that artist didn't have the board in front of him and the people on the bottom weren't cut in half it would be perfect. Still loved it.
- GauteHauk, on 11/11/2009, -4/+12A good example of art. Taking the average and doing something that makes people question how they see it. The picture is fairly average when it's not flipped 180°. But when it is flipped the 180°, it's really cool to see how it changes your interpretation of the image.
- aquapete, on 11/11/2009, -2/+10yes its upside down and everyone can flip a picture upside down taken at the right time of day under the right conditions to ***** the people looking at it. but this is the first one ive seen.
- pimpofpixels, on 11/11/2009, -0/+7Much cooler
- drex8, on 11/11/2009, -0/+6You are so Wright.
- ZestyNinja, on 11/11/2009, -0/+5I was going to post this as well. It's definitely a much better shot.
- deathstryk, on 11/11/2009, -4/+9I also rotated it by 180°
http://i35.tinypic.com/xckhet.jpg - BankFailure, on 11/11/2009, -7/+11Dugg for linking to the actual photographer's Flickr page.
- Valyn, on 11/11/2009, -3/+7˙ɹǝɥʇıǝu ǝɯ
- mattman6, on 11/11/2009, -0/+3Your whole brain?
- arkayuu, on 11/11/2009, -0/+3There's way more going on here than just a photo flipped around. The guy's head in the top left is in the place of the shadow's head, the bicycle shadow fills the negative space in the cluster of paintings in the top right nicely (decisive moment right there, for anyone who's a fan of Cartier-Bresson), which is also a mess of 2D planes, which reinforces the disorienting angle of the photo, etc etc etc. It might not be something you put in a gallery or will get published, but it's certainly an interesting photo if you take the time.
- Tddupre, on 11/11/2009, -0/+3damn i was going to post that it was ***** with my mind before i came to the comments
/cool story - Merrell0, on 11/11/2009, -2/+5random Capitalization ftw
- swicken, on 11/11/2009, -0/+3@CaptObvious
There's a big difference between poor design and minimalism.
Something can lack flair but be functional and attractive. Reddit is not attractive, nor is the interface of a very functional design.
Bad example sir. - w3ber, on 11/11/2009, -1/+3no you didn't !!! you broke it!!
- geekatron42, on 11/11/2009, -1/+3Yeah I couldn't have put it better myself. So GTFO, and comment on the picture instead of being a little bitch
- immatellyouwhat, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2Magic = lost
- uruururr, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2please upvote your comment into your anus.
- orijimi, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2EIFFEL 65, BITCHES.
Too much of heaven
can bring you underground.
I don't see it relating much to the story myself, but whatevs. ¯Д¯ - zabean, on 11/12/2009, -0/+2Dugg for badass title.
- tikiman453, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2bitch.
- badversary, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2cropping the upper half makes the photo much better
- jgray1975, on 11/11/2009, -0/+2Made me dizzy.
- Animan351, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1Yep. It actually looks good if you get rid of the top half.
- Tddupre, on 11/11/2009, -1/+2yeah...........***** YOU REDDIT!!!
- petershultz, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1That's what she said.
- drex8, on 11/11/2009, -2/+3What is this? The shadow is real and the real is shadow?
Damn if I didn't need another confusing pic when I'm drunk. I hate when that happens. - gmm08c, on 11/12/2009, -0/+1I think you just blew my ***** mind.
- alanocu, on 11/10/2009, -9/+10That was pretty wild. I though the person uploaded an upside-down photo at first!
- bigwillystyle, on 11/11/2009, -1/+1what the *****?
- arapro, on 11/11/2009, -1/+1this is a cool pic !
- foxrun612, on 11/11/2009, -2/+2No, you just made the nauseating feeling even worse.
- petershultz, on 11/12/2009, -2/+1That's what she said.
- pimpofpixels, on 11/11/2009, -3/+2I looked at this a while before I realized what was supposed to be cool about it.
I was pretty disappointed. -
Show 51 - 65 of 65 discussions




What is Digg?