What is Digg?58 Comments
- xcpleprechaun, on 07/08/2009, -1/+43None of these pictures are of digital cameras. I call shenanigans!
- BrandonShea, on 07/08/2009, -1/+36Was it just me or does it seem like there are much better digital pictures out there? I mean, they're not bad... but best of the year? Come on.
- borez, on 07/08/2009, -0/+22I love this one, caught off-guard whilst nesting in the wild:
http://www.juzaphoto.com/shared_files/articles/can ... - Lucas123, on 07/08/2009, -1/+20He really shouldn't try to drive from the back seat and catch dinner at the same time.
- nintapple, on 07/08/2009, -0/+14These photos are obviously professional and well taken but none of these really scream out to me.
- deezeejoey, on 07/08/2009, -0/+14Might be just me, but half of those photos weren't all that super.
- awtripp, on 07/08/2009, -1/+12It's a programming thing. != has meant ≠ for a long ***** time. It's always best to do some research before making yourself look like ***** idiot.
- inactive, on 07/08/2009, -0/+10You must be a blast at parties.
- fakhro, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8actually if u take a closer look at image 2, the captain is screaming.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/telegraph/multimedia/ar ... - vivalanation734, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8if something HDR wins, all hope is lost.
- pault107, on 07/08/2009, -0/+8There are some good photographs amongst that bunch. Some mediocre ones too. I'm not saying I could do any better, of course.
- awtripp, on 07/08/2009, -2/+9No, I just said "best to do some research before making yourself look like a ***** idiot."
I stated it was a programing thing to rebut the "in your world" comment and that the use of != has been around "a long ***** time."
Never the less, it is Digg where it used to be only techies, now it is filled with a bunch of anti-intellectual *****. - marktastic, on 07/08/2009, -0/+6This is Digg after all. Everyone should
- kentrung, on 07/09/2009, -0/+6selective coloring really?
image 15, im looking at you! - tango1110, on 07/08/2009, -0/+5The penguins looked like Lemmings.
- haterofps3, on 07/08/2009, -1/+6Please read the title of the Article again...
Recent Entries != Best of the year - chooochooo, on 07/08/2009, -0/+5nice photo ... but make me feel sad for antelope
- noizeuk, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4They should hold a phone camera picture contest.
- Catchpen, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4Just ask Wile E. Coyote!
- frequentFlyer, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4Land Cruisers FTW
- lnxfi, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4you are welcome
- rmartin8484, on 07/08/2009, -0/+4this is a really great comments!
- Hellahulla, on 07/09/2009, -0/+3http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/!%3D
Google doesn't handle stuff like that well on it's own. For quick reference wikipedia is probably the first place you should look. - BlackOculus, on 07/08/2009, -0/+3Might be just me, but half those photos were super!
- ScottMcIntyre, on 07/08/2009, -4/+7So many great images- I don't envy the judges! I like No. 8 (Penguin City)... the blue and white hues in the glacier scene are stunning.
- prisoner24601, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2There's a caption guys...
"Running by Kareem Alanazi of Saudi Arabia, who explains that the man is saving the antelope at the end of a dog race" - Metatron197, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2Thank God for autopager.
- PowderedToasty, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2What year is this? Do people still draw a big distinction between digital and film?
- awtripp, on 07/09/2009, -0/+2I've never had anyone hang themselves to honour my techy highness. Thank you. I feel... powerful...
- chicbicyclist, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2I think his point was that the antelope was being used as a dog racing bait. What happens if he fails to grab it?
- ancientdinko, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2I think he's letting it go
- inactive, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2this sucks
- cjw10, on 07/08/2009, -1/+3Just you.
- rarefactory, on 07/08/2009, -1/+3I know these are just entries to a contest, but most of these aren't great at all. It seems to me that nowadays anybody who buys a nice camera and Photoshop fancies themselves to be a photographer.
- LomasLou, on 07/08/2009, -0/+2A typical Friday night out with the boys in Saudi Arabia.
- ATH025, on 07/08/2009, -1/+2You're thinking photo-journalism, which is completely different from photographic art. However most of the images in this article were nothing special anyway.
- Kate1240, on 07/08/2009, -0/+1I hope that little guy can outrun a Toyota!
- alpha94, on 07/08/2009, -3/+4I couldn't get past the second one, they are terrible. The framing of the first is horrible and the second is blurry but it doesn't look like it was remotely on purpose. Rule of thirds people, come on.
- pault107, on 07/08/2009, -2/+3He was trying to save the antelope.
- AmazingSteve, on 07/09/2009, -0/+1Really? These are Photographer of the Year submissions?
- Kidddrunkadelic, on 07/09/2009, -0/+1Run Bambi, Run! You know what they did to your mother.
- BossKey, on 07/08/2009, -1/+22001 called, and they want their opinion of digital photography back
- PowderedToasty, on 07/08/2009, -1/+1I actually agree when it comes to movies, digital doesn't look right to me yet, but I'm not as good at spotting the difference in still photos. So you're saying it's still separated for the same reason the nba is different than the wnba?
- rockon4life45, on 07/08/2009, -1/+1Good stuff, I like the action stuff much more than the 'artsy' and 'angles' stuff though.
- plengier, on 08/18/2009, -0/+0Looking good
- spriggig, on 07/08/2009, -2/+1I'm pretty sure he's gonna eat it.
- ikeeel4money, on 07/08/2009, -2/+1The car is stationary. look at the tire tracks.
- skinjester, on 07/08/2009, -1/+0at what? tennis? immediacy? resolution? cost? It doesn't have to be one medium or the other, can just as easily be both.
- rmartin8484, on 07/09/2009, -1/+0programmers have small dicks and get no pussy. but this is digg...it used to be all tech people. now there ARE some people that are able to get pussy.
-
Show 51 - 59 of 59 discussions
© Digg Inc. 2009
— Content created and posted by Digg users is 
